Skip to main content
replaced http://rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This questionThis question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of alone, general focus item?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of alone, general focus item?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of alone, general focus item?

deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
Christopher
  • 12.2k
  • 3
  • 55
  • 81

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5eD&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This question assumes such material components in 3e3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of a lonealone, general focus item?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of a lone, general focus item?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard).

This question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of alone, general focus item?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackRPG/status/801373598871154689
Cleaning up.
Source Link
Hey I Can Chan
  • 192.7k
  • 18
  • 362
  • 876

What is What's the point of requiring specific "cheap" Material Componentinexpensive material components?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly Materialmaterial components. But, in terms of making gameplay more interesting, but what is the pointpoint—in terms of "cheap" (no cost specified inmaking the PhB) Material Componentsgame more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a "leafleaf of sumac"sumac or "aa tiny ball of bat guano"guano?

Watching D&D 5e streams I've never seen anybody even bother if their heroes have thatwith these kinds of particular item, everyitems in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster just uses either an Arcane Focusarcane focus or a Component Pouchspell component pouch (or a musical instrument for Bards) asif a single itembard).   

This question assumes it wassuch material components in 3e are a legacy (pre-3rd) feature, from the times when allmost components were consumable.

For the 5th edition, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific items,inexpensive material components instead of a singlelone, general "focus"focus item, in order to be cast?

What is the point of requiring specific "cheap" Material Component?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly Material components. But, in terms of making gameplay more interesting, what is the point of "cheap" (no cost specified in the PhB) Material Components, like a "leaf of sumac" or "a tiny ball of bat guano"?

Watching D&D 5e streams I've never seen anybody even bother if their heroes have that particular item, every caster just uses either an Arcane Focus or a Component Pouch (or a musical instrument for Bards) as a single item.  This question assumes it was a legacy (pre-3rd) feature, from the times when all components were consumable.

For the 5th edition, is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific items, instead of a single general "focus" item, in order to be cast?

What's the point of requiring specific inexpensive material components?

I understand the necessity of consumable or costly material components, but what is the point—in terms of making the game more interesting—of inexpensive material components, like a leaf of sumac or a tiny ball of bat guano?

I've never seen anybody even bother with these kinds of particular items in any D&D 5e streams. Every caster uses either an arcane focus or a spell component pouch (or a musical instrument if a bard). 

This question assumes such material components in 3e are a legacy feature from when most components were consumable, but for 5e is there any particular reason why many spells still require specific inexpensive material components instead of a lone, general focus item?

added 16 characters in body; deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
enkryptor
  • 70.8k
  • 34
  • 238
  • 398
Loading
Source Link
enkryptor
  • 70.8k
  • 34
  • 238
  • 398
Loading