Timeline for Does Gaseous Form take non-magic damage?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 27, 2017 at 2:07 | comment | added | chrylis -cautiouslyoptimistic- | This sounds like a case where Rule 0 is prominently in play. | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 19:23 | history | edited | Dale M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed vulnerable (which has a specific mechanical meaning in D&D 5e to susceptible (which does not)
|
| Mar 26, 2017 at 18:29 | history | edited | Christopher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed personal opinion
|
| Mar 26, 2017 at 16:29 | comment | added | inthemanual | The word vulnerable might not be the best choice, given that it has a mechanical definition in 5e | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 14:54 | comment | added | Christopher | A byproduct of all the 4e I played, I guess. But the point stands: the spell grants resistance, not immunity. | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 14:53 | comment | added | A. Foster | "The name and description of the spell are just flavour text to the rules of the spell." There is some debate about this: rpg.stackexchange.com/q/78012 | |
| Mar 26, 2017 at 14:45 | vote | accept | Mira | ||
| Mar 26, 2017 at 14:22 | history | answered | Christopher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |