3
\$\begingroup\$

I want to write a campaign where magic is totally absent using an existing setting—like an existing area where magic is strictly forbidden by authorities or an existing dead magic zone.

For the purposes of this campaign I don't want to create my own world or my own setting in an existing world.

If possible, I would like an area that is as medievally-realistic as possible. Like, not the city of Sigil or a desert area with dead magic or a no-magic plane.

The ultimate goal is to make a campaign that would seem medievally-realistic hence the need to have no apparent magic possible.

Are there areas in Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, Dragonlance or other wizard official worlds that would work for this? What areas are there where magic is forbidden or "dead"? Im open to areas in Pathfinder as well, but don't want to go too far off official paizo or official wizard of the coast.

If the area has no non-humans it's best, but I can do with them as well.
Forbidden is cool too, because if any magic is considered heresy, it still feels kind of historical.

\$\endgroup\$
9
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ If you want "medieval realistic", you'd also want a place with no non-human and non-animal creatures, I presume? If so, you should edit that into the question. \$\endgroup\$
    – Erik
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 10:05
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ @V2Blast I'm not sure this is idea generation; it's not "help me design a place like this", it's "does a place like this exist in a published setting?" \$\endgroup\$
    – Carcer
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 10:41
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ there's absolutely no way this is idea generation. Its asking for an answer based on established lore \$\endgroup\$
    – Wibbs
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 11:15
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you interested in other game systems, or must it be D&D 5e? Secondly, forbidden leaves open the chance of "underground, hidden, or illegal" uses of magic, while dead means "there is no magic." Which is it that you want? The former can allow later instances of small amounts of magic, or discovery of it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 13:00
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast If they open it to other game systems then this turns into a system recommendation question. Which, honestly, is a shame, because D&D is not designed for low-magic/no-magic campaigns, and so that tends to be something that DMs get excited about but players end up hating. \$\endgroup\$
    – Oblivious Sage
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 13:42

2 Answers 2

13
\$\begingroup\$

In general, you're going to be hard pressed to find a very large area where magic does not function or is entirely forbidden, for the simple fact that D&D's adventurers have always been highly magical and dependent on magic. A place where none of your cool stuff works anymore or where several character classes become almost entirely useless is not likely to be a fun place to set adventures, so they aren't going to take up much space in a published setting; places where the rules of magic are just a bit different are more common.

If you're happy to operate at a very small scale, though, there's a couple of spots in the Forgotten Realms which you might look into. FR is normally an extremely high-magic setting and the dead-magic zones which do exist are not large enough to fit an entire kingdom in by any stretch, but there are:

The City of Tantras

During the events of the Time of Troubles, the gods Torm and Bane fought each other in the city, the end result of which being that the gods slew each other and the battle created a dead magic zone covering the entire northern quarter of the city ("a zone of some 400 acres", apparently).

The rest of the city still has magic, and the dead magic zone itself isn't a pleasant place to go as it became widely used by criminals hiding from magical detection.

The Valley/Village of Dead Tree Hollow

The valley now known as Dead Tree Hollow was turned into a dead magic zone a few hundred years ago, after a vengeful mage furious at being rejected instead decided to murder the unfortunate lady and everyone around her.

The valley is small, but large enough that it contains a small village and surrounding lands, so it could be suitable as a no-magic location for small-scale adventuring. Note that even in this case it's not as if magic will be unknown to the villagers that live there - they would not have to travel very far to find places full of wizards and clerics.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It might be worth mentioning the spell plague \$\endgroup\$
    – ravery
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 15:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Spell plague. Not bad. The world of "Abeir" could work as well in a way. Too bad it disappeared in 5e \$\endgroup\$
    – Taiko
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 15:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ravery my understanding of the time during the spell plague was that although a lot of magic stopped working properly, it was also a lot to do with magic working differently and there was obviously magical catastrophe going on all over the shop, so it doesn't fit very well with the requirements. \$\endgroup\$
    – Carcer
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 17:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Carcer -- The weave that underlies arcane magic was destroyed, with arcane magic users dying or going insane, along with most rechargable magic items being destroyed. What little magic that was left was wild and unreliable, with spells either not working or producing undesired effects. \$\endgroup\$
    – ravery
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 17:28
5
\$\begingroup\$

D&D doesn't have to include magic

The DMG mentions includes a "Magic in Your World" section (pages 23-24) that describe that magic may not be as common is some worlds as others. In particular, the "Restriction on Magic" section on page 24 says:

Some civilized areas might restrict or prohibit the use of magic. Spellcasting might be forbidden without a license or official permission. In such a place, magic items and continual magical effects are rare, protections against magic being the exception.

There's also the "Flavors of Fantasy" section (pages 38-41), showing that different flavours or genres of fantasy can lean more towards horror, mystery, heroic adventures, etc. It's entirely possible to simply have a world without magic that's more like a more realistic medieval world (but with monsters in it, still).

Since you mentioned not wanting to come up with your own universe (yet), you could simply use something like the Forgotten Realms and tweak it to downplay or remove any references to magic, but otherwise use the world as-is where it doesn't contradict your "no magic" requirement.

Obviously the classes that your players have access to will reflect that

Assuming you don't want any magic at all, then there are certain classes I assume won't be available to your players, such as Bards, Clerics, Wizards, etc. but also certain archetypes, such as Eldritch Knights, Arcane Tricksters, etc. There are a few edge cases that you might want to think about, such as Monks; is their "Ki" magical? Or are you willing to overlook that one? I imagine the Way of the Four Elements archetype would probably be restricted, though...

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .