16
\$\begingroup\$

In the recent Unearthed Arcana about Psionic powers, one of the abilities is

Ego Whip (3 psi) - As an action, choose one creature you can see within 60 feet. The target must make an INT saving throw. On a failed save, it takes 3d8 psychic damage and is filled with self-doubt, and on its next turn, it can only take the Dodge, Disengage, or Hide action. On a successful save, half damage.

Against a Black Pudding who has immunities to Charm or Intimidation, would that attack hit or not?

Further info on this UA group of abilities is the ability

Forceful Query (2 psi) - As an action, you can ask a question of one creature that can see and hear you within 30 feet. Must be a yes/no question. If creature fails WIS saving throw, they must tell the truth. (Immune if charm-proof)

It's this last part in parenthesis that I want to emphasize: The designers took the time to mention that THIS ability will fail if your monster is charm-proof, yet didn't do this for the Ego Whip. With that as a counter-point, should Ego Whip be fixed to be considered a charm that a charm-proof monster is immune from?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to SE! Good first question. \$\endgroup\$ – Jeff Jun 22 '17 at 14:55
17
\$\begingroup\$

No, it is not Charm Based

Unfortunately, Unearthed Arcana is play-test and incomplete. WoTC may not have purposefully left out that creatures Immune to Charm could avoid the effect, but it likely was purposeful.

Since there is no clarification, you need to go with the language provided. If it doesn't say there is a Charm effect or that a creature who is immune to charm is protected, then it remains active.

Note: Most Charm effects are WIS saves, not INT. The fact that Ego Whip is INT suggests it is purposeful that there isn't Charm Immunity attached.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the INT/WIS note on Charm saves \$\endgroup\$ – BlueMoon93 Jun 22 '17 at 15:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BlueMoon93 I put in "most" because I'm not positive :) But pretty sure it's ALL. \$\endgroup\$ – NautArch Jun 22 '17 at 15:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just to add to a fine answer that D&D is a Rules As Written (RAW) game so if it doesn't say it is a Charm based effect anywhere, for instance, then it isn't. There are no "implied" rules. \$\endgroup\$ – Protonflux Jun 22 '17 at 16:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Protonflux I'm a big RAW guy and often very literal, but D&D 5e has been developed to allow for a lot of table ruling/judgements. While there aren't implied rules, there is a large degree of freedom given in the ruleset to alter/adjust as needed or desired. Happy to discuss in chat \$\endgroup\$ – NautArch Jun 22 '17 at 16:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Protonflux 100% agree. Also worth noting: unlearn the DnD from previous editions, and don't overhtink stuff. If it is written, then it is to be taken at face value, even if contradicts more general rules. If not, don't overthink. 5e is a rules lawyer hell. And that is its strongest selling point. \$\endgroup\$ – Mindwin Jun 23 '17 at 4:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.