The level 1 Sor/Wiz spell power word pain [ench] (Races of the Dragon 116) includes among its characteristics:

  • allowing no saving throw, and...
  • dealing an average of 38.5 points of damage over an average of 10 rounds to one creature with less than 50 hp.

This seems an unreasonable amount of damage... unless there is somehow a way to interrupt the continuous damage.

How can this ongoing effect be negated? What can render a typical creature immune to it?

Note: The exact damage dealt by the spell is 1d6 + 1d6/round for 4d4 rounds. That's a theoretical maximum of 102 points of damage on a creature that possesses less than 50 hp in a game where healing spells are inefficient. (It takes at least 6 cure light wound spells to overcome the difference).

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Historical Note: I am unaware of the same spells' presentations in later editions, but there's no punctuation in the names of any of the power spells in D&D 3.5 (including pain plus kill, blind, and stun). However, in AD&D and AD&D 2e, the power word spells had commas between the words power word and their effects—e.g. power word, kill. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 12, 2017 at 18:18

2 Answers 2


Very little ends an ongoing power word pain effect

As this fine answer explains, a dispel magic effect may end a power word pain effect, but the earliest such an effect's available is typically the 2nd-level Sor/Wiz spell dispelling touch [abjur] (Player's Handbook II 110). This makes a potion of dispelling touch (300 gp; 0.1 lbs.) or an arcane scroll of dispelling touch (150 gp; 0 lbs.) (both created using a 2nd-level spell at caster level 3) a reasonable purchase for anyone in a party that—so far—has only been watching the spell power word pain be used against foes.

Any effect that renders a creature immune to mind-affecting effects likewise renders a creature immune to the effects of power word pain as all spells of the school of enchantment are mind-affecting. However, immunity to such effects is typically a high-level effect (e.g. the 8th-level spell mind blank [abjur] (Player's Handbook 253), the face slot magic item third eye conceal (Magic Item Compendium 141) (120,000 gp; 1 lb.)).

A DM that's struggling to challenge a group that's decided to run away after opening every encounter with a power word pain spell—letting the spell do the killing for them—might find the game more interesting if he confronts such PCs with more creatures of the types construct, ooze, plant, undead, vermin, and so forth as such creatures are, by default, immune to mind-affecting effects.

Note that even the handful of things that should prevent the effects of a power word pain spell often, in fact, don't. For instance,—and I'm not making this up—the nipple clamp of exquisite pain (Book of Vile Darkness 118) (8,000 gp; 0 lbs., and let's thank heavens for that) that makes "[t]he wearer… immune to debilitating pain effects" also says that the wearer "is not immune to actual damage described as pain," which should likely include the damage dealt by a power word pain spell's effect. Similarly, the 2nd-level Clr spell ease pain [conj (Book of Exalted Deeds 97) says, "If the target creature is under some effect that causes continuing damage, the pain is eased only for a moment," and so the power word pain spell's effect would be briefly abated… then start up again! It's almost like the power word pain spell was written to bypass such effects deliberately.

In short, the spell power word pain kills creatures… and PCs. If the PCs are using it in every fight, then enemy wizards should be just as willing to use it in return… as should clerics that pick the domain Magic and anyone with sufficient ranks in the skill Use Magic Device, an arcane scroll of power word pain costing a mere 25 gp. The spell's big limiter at low levels is its range, so wizards—or those mistaken for wizards—should remain the obvious target in any group of foes if the spell is common in the campaign. And any foe affected by a power word pain spell should behave like a PC who knows that he's going to die anyway: by extravagantly expending all of his resources to kill the dude who has already killed him, especially since his death will be—in terms of combat rounds—slow and, of course, painful.

Also, although the spell power word pain lacks the descriptor evil, the spell is, by any measure, cruel, and this DM has many folks treat with contempt and hatred those dishonorable casters that employ the spell against intelligent creatures. Your campaign, of course, may vary.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Everything attrition will be more harmful than benefical for players. If the players want to spread the word around, so should the DM make the NPC do the same. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 12, 2017 at 23:08
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Mindwin Unfortunately, the spell power word pain (like the spell aboleth's lung in Pathfinder) is often so incredibly effective in the short-term that there may never be a long-term, the DM having grown so disheartened by the spell's overuse. The real keys for the DM, I think, are A) to use a far wider variety of foes, and B) not to get too attached to NPCs. Both of these likely make the DM's job a lot harder, though. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 12, 2017 at 23:18

You can dispel power word: pain as you can any other spell. It has no special dismissal conditions, however. Even getting your HP over 50 after being affected would not end the spell.

And yes, this is a very large amount of damage for a 1st-level spell.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @HeyICanChan And yes, I’m aware of the lack of colon in official formatting. I like mine better :P \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    Jul 12, 2017 at 18:52
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ In fact, the caster can't even himself dismiss the power word pain effect, the spell's duration lacking the [D]! This has led—on more than one occasion—to a low-level caster in my campaign killing a foe that he later realized he'd've rather subdued. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 13, 2017 at 0:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .