8
\$\begingroup\$

If you use a magically enchanted buckler and a weapon in that hand, do you also lose the enchantment bonus to AC?

\$\endgroup\$
16
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, Enhancement bonus is an increase to the item's statistic(s); if you lose the item's functionality for any reason, you also lose any of the bonuses associated.

Essentially a +1 buckler has 2 Shield AC. You would lose your Shield AC by not being able to properly use the buckler, not just the base AC.

For example, having a +1 shortsword in one hand and a regular shortsword in the other doesn't provide you +1 to hit with the second hand weapon. The bonus only applies to the object that is enhanced.

\$\endgroup\$
8
\$\begingroup\$

You don’t have an enhancement bonus to AC.

Your buckler has an enhancement bonus to its shield bonus to AC that it grants you.

And yes, this is a confusing mess; see here for more details.

So the base shield bonus is +1, and it gets a +2, say, enhancement bonus, meaning the magical buckler provides a total of +3 shield bonus to your AC.

And since it is all the buckler’s shield bonus, it goes away when you attack with that hand.

The Improved Buckler Defense feat from Complete Warrior can allow you to retain the shield bonus while attacking with that hand, but you still take the attack penalty and at any rate a feat is much too expensive for this. Better to get a +1 animated heavy shield at some point in the future if you want to use both hands for weapons while having a shield.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ This situation recently showed up on a table of D&D 3.X I'm DMing. One of my senior players explained how this worked by explaining that a "enhancement bonus" is actually a "metabonus" - a bonus to a bonus. The term stuck, and now we use it all the time to refer to similar stuff when dealing with those situations. I'm not sure if this way of referring to enhancement bonuses actually help everyone, but I wanted to give my 2¢ \$\endgroup\$ – T. Sar Jul 28 '17 at 18:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @T.Sar I like it, anyway! \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 28 '17 at 18:22
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @T.Sar That's a good clarification term! Also: probably worth it to note that this is not generally true of all enhancement bonuses. For instance, Eagle's Splendor provides an enhancement bonus to Charisma, but it's just a regular bonus, not a meta-bonus. \$\endgroup\$ – A_S00 Jul 28 '17 at 19:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's awkward to get your head around, agreed, but necessary to keep stacking rules consistent. If the bonuses were to AC and conditionally stacked, it would be a bigger mess. \$\endgroup\$ – Wyrmwood Jul 28 '17 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.