In Tomb of Annihilation, there's a character who offers a spellbook containing some random spells as a reward. My players don't have an arcane magic user, just a druid, so would they be unable to use this item? It's not a big deal if so, I'll just substitute some magic items or scrolls instead.

  • \$\begingroup\$ You should remove the words "arcane spells" from the title I guess, since there is no arcane nor divine spells in 5e - the same spell can be granted by a deity or be learned by studying the arcane. So it's more about magic source, not about classification of spells. \$\endgroup\$
    – enkryptor
    Dec 8, 2017 at 20:01

3 Answers 3


Not even being an Arcane Magic user would be enough. You need to actually have the Spellbook feature, which generally means being a Wizard.

So in this case, yeah, there's not much a Druid can do with the book.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks! I'll just have the party being presented with some magic items from a tantalisingly large storeroom instead. \$\endgroup\$
    – chooban
    Dec 7, 2017 at 13:59
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Just note that the Spellbook is not a regular magic item. It doesn't generally increase the Wizard's power. It gives them more versatility based on the spells found and whether the Wizard knows them already or would ever use them. There are many ways for Wizards to find new spells (such as paying another Wizard gold to copy their book). I don't think you should replace the spellbook with more than a single common or uncommon magic item, or you may end up giving out much more treasure than is expected (unless you are already playing that way). \$\endgroup\$
    – Nick Brown
    Dec 7, 2017 at 14:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ Cool, I'll keep that in mind. I'm pretty bad at remembering to put magic items around, so any at all will be a boon to them! \$\endgroup\$
    – chooban
    Dec 7, 2017 at 14:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @chooban Not that I'm trying to steal the acceptance, but it is generally beneficial to wait a few days before awarding it. If you accept right away, it discourages other people from creating answers that may provide a better or more thorough answer to your question. \$\endgroup\$
    – T.J.L.
    Dec 7, 2017 at 14:48

Sources of Spells

From a mechanical perspective, there is no such thing as "arcane" and "divine" magic anymore. In 5th Edition, they've harmonized a lot of the spellcasting rules each spell has a level, and has identical effects regardless of the class that grants it. Half-casters (Ranger, Paladin) and third-casters (Arcane Trickster, Eldritch Knight) may get a particular spell at a later character level due to slower progression, but the spell works the same way as any other caster.

Using A Spellbook

In order to make use of a spellbook, the character has to have a feature that allows them to copy over spells.

  • All Wizards have a Spellbook; an ever expandable collection of knowledge. Given sufficient time, money, and exposure, they can copy any and all spells on the Wizard list into their spellbook.
  • Some Warlocks have the Pact of the Tome boon and the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, allowing them to scribe and cast rituals from any class.
  • Any character can take the Ritual Caster feat, and be able to scribe and cast ritual spells from one particular class.

Other Spell Knowledge

Each class has a (sometimes subtly) different way to determine spells known and spells prepared. Druids and Clerics, in particular, already "know" all the spells it is possible for them to know. The other classes methods are beyond the scope of this particular question, but should serve as good reading.


Reiterating small parts of T.J.L.'s answer because I want my answer to be complete, but have important aspects to add.

Divine versus Arcane

Distinctions between the two do not exist. Magic is magic, and even psionic abilities radiate as magic, even if they do not count as spells.


There are only two RAW reasons to use a spellbook:

  • Wizards prepare all spells from their spellbook.

  • Characters with Ritual Caster can cast spells tagged with the Ritual descriptor.

Alternate Spell Knowledge

That said, if you desire it to be a worthwhile item, what it can do is introduce players to spells that they haven't seen in the Player's Handbook.

In Adventurer's League, they specifically only allow expanded spells from the "+1" source-book that is chosen during creation, so the concern about issues like spell list bloat are dealt with, and Wizards can learn from outside their "+1" if they can find a scroll with a spell from outside the PHB and their extra source book.

There's no technical RAW method for casters outside of Wizards and ritual casters to gain new spells if they become available. Technically, by RAW, if you include the spell, it is simply an available option to non-Wizards, but logically, they would at least have to be exposed enough to be able to learn them. In the case of Clerics or Druids, conversation and observation with other casters could provide this, but a spell-book of sorts could be a reasonable buy-in for an in game reason to gain access to spells that, for example, come from Xanathar's Guide to Everything that they hadn't seen before.

It makes more sense than saying that the character didn't know that a single spell existed until they knew a ton of new spells did.

If you take this approach, it can make the 'spell-book' a collection of notes by a more academically inclined caster of the right type, and reading through the book would add these spells permanently to the spells available list of the character in question. For clerics and druids, this means they can choose them when they prepare their known spells every day. For classes like warlock or sorcerer this could make them available as a "spells known" choice when they level.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .