In order to drink a potion do you have to first retrieve the item as a move action and then drink it as a standard?

I am assuming one could have a potion on say a belt and then it would only take a standard but if the potion was in a backpack I would think it would take a move to retrieve it and then a standard to drink.


2 Answers 2


A creature must usually take a move action to retrieve a stored item like a potion

Like this fine answer mentions, a creature typically takes a move action to manipulate an item, and that "includes retrieving or putting away a stored item" (Player's Handbook 143), like a potion stowed in a backpack or belt pouch. Worse, according to Table 8–2: Actions in Combat, a creature that tries to "retrieve a stored item" provokes an attack of opportunity from each foe threatening the creature.

Potions aren't weapons… unfortunately

To clarify, on draw or sheathe a weapon says that a creature that possesses a base attack bonus of at least +1, during a move action in which the creature moves up to its speed, can also take a free action to draw a weapon (142). In addition, "[i]f you have the Two-Weapon Fighting feat…, you can draw two light or one-handed weapons in the time it would normally take you to draw one" (ibid.). Moreover, the feat Quick Draw (PH 98) allows a creature to "draw a weapon as a free action instead of as a move action." Unlike Pathfinder, it's been my experience that this typically includes splash weapons (e.g. a flask of alchemist's fire, a flask of holy water) yet not potions.

Exchanges in the Dragon #328 Sage Advice column “Official Answers to Your Questions” (80) clarify that the Quick Draw feat's benefit extends to wands, rods, and staffs. (These exchanges are repeated nearly verbatim in the D&D Frequently Asked Questions (68) with which some take issue.) The Rules Compendium repeats this information and clarifies further that "[w]ands are light, and rods are one-handed" (9).

In sum, potions aren't mentioned as a possibility for faster retrieval either by draw or sheathe a weapon or the feat Quick Draw and, while later material expands their mandates, their mandates weren't ever expanded specifically to cover potions like they were to cover wands et al. In fact, this DM's never considered potions weapons, and this player's never had a DM who has. Nonetheless, I can imagine a house rule—especially in, for example, a low-magic campaign wherein every PC is mundane combatant—that says Potions are treated as weapons for the purposes of draw or sheathe a weapon.

Ways to retrieve and consume a potion more quickly and sometimes without risk

It seems to this reader that the game later understood that, as presented in the core rules, potions are pretty terrible magical spell delivery devices. So, largely outside the core rules, several options make potions… not good, really, but, at least, better.

  • I've mentioned the best potion delivery device—the ready-drink helm (or, reskinned for steampunk, the dwarven injector) (Dragon #294 80–1) (either is 150 gp; 2 lbs.)—in other answers here and here, respectively. Either is a mundane game-changer, giving mundane creatures in particular a significant edge in combat. Either allows a wearer to take free actions that don't provoke attacks of opportunity to consume a potion but there's some danger to the potions the item contains if the wearer is tripped or otherwise falls.

  • The mundane item potion belt (Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting 96) (1 gp; 1 lb.) or masterwork potion belt (Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting 96) (1 gp; 1 lb.) stores 6 potions or 10 potions, respectively. A wearer can 1/round take a free action to retrieve a potion from either potion belt. (This DM would only allow a creature to wear one at a time, and the creature must pick which to wear.) Although this still provokes attacks of opportunity as normal, it is faster.

  • The new ranger equipment tactical vest (Dragon #323 103) (5 gp; 2 lbs.) allows a wearer to take a move action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity to retrieve items stored within. The tactical vest holds 10 lbs. of items. (That's 100 potions… or your entire fortune in chalk, sewing needles, and signal whistles.)

  • The goods item potion bracer (Sharn: City of Towers 159) (100 gp; 1.5 lbs.) holds 3 potions, each of which the wearer can take a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity to consume. A sunder attempt can be made against a potion bracer (AC 14 + the wearer’s Dexterity modifier; hardness 8, hp 5), and an attack dealing more than 4 points of damage destroys a potion. A potion bracer's wearer has a 5% arcane spell failure chance.

  • The weapon modification hilt hollow (Dungeonscape 30, 33) (200 gp; 0 lbs.) can be added to any weapon. A creature can take a full-round action to load the hilt hollow with a little item like a potion. A creature that doesn't know about a weapon's hilt hollow that succeeds on a Search skill check (DC 30) locates a weapon's the hilt hollow. A creature wielding the weapon can take a swift action to eject the hilt hollow's contents into an empty hand.

  • The armor, shield, or weapon modification oil chamber (Du 30, 33–34) (1,000 gp; 0 lbs.) can be added to any weapon or shield and two can be added to armor. A creature can take a full-round action to load the chamber with an alchemical or magical oil. The wielder, user, or wearer can take a swift action to apply the loaded alchemical or magical oil to the respective armor, shield, weapon, or weapon's ammunition.

    Although only really good for magical oils (that have their own problems1), oil of bless weapon (1st-level spell at caster level 2) (100 gp; 0.1 lbs.), for example, is almost always a welcome addition to a warrior's arsenal.

  • The prestige class alchemist savant (Magic of Eberron 53-7) can brew a spellvial that has a price 50% higher than a potion and a more limited range of spells it can contain. However, spellvials "can be used as thrown weapons," so a creature that possesses the feat Quick Draw should be able to take a free action that doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity to draw one. Despite this, there's no indication as to how a creature can employ a spellvial on itself, the author seeming to imagine a spellvial being used exclusively on another. (This DM recommends a house rule saying that A creature can make an attack that doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity to use on itself a spellvial.)

  • In the core rules, Heward's handy haversack (Dungeon Master's Guide 259) (2,000 gp; 5 lbs.) allows a creature to take a move action that doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity to retrieve any item from it. (The DM may permit a bag of holding (DMG 248) (2,500+ gp; 15+ lbs.) that isn't loaded beyond standard backpack capacity to have this same ability, although this isn't mentioned as a bag's "even greater power" like it is with the haversack.)2

In short, Dumpster-diving makes potions sort of bearable. They remain substandard options compared to, for example, wands and lack the versatility of, for example, attuned gems (Magic of Faerûn 21), but they can be forced to be useful, especially if the DM approves the dwarven injector.

1 In what this reader is certain is an oversight, the feat Brew Potion (PH 89) allows creating only potions and not magic oils, perhaps making all magic oils the product of the long-forgotten Age of Inference?
2 Heward's handy haversack in allowed "[r]etrieving any specific item from a haversack [as] a free action[, and t]he handy haversack and whatever it contains gain a +2 resistance bonus to all saving throws." These features were altered and removed, respectively, by 3.5e revision, which, in the first case, is probably a good thing. It was kind of nuts.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You’re actually the first person I’ve met who hasn’t treated potions as weapon-like for the purpose of drawing them—most everyone I play 3.5 with was furious with Pathfinder’s opposite ruling, because we always had. Anyway, your header there seems a little more certain/strong than your actual conclusion in the text. Anyway, +1 for a whole host of potion-related options, most of which I’d never heard of and the rest I’d forgotten (frankly, the people I play with have pretty much written potions off entirely, despite giving them the benefit of weapon-like drawing). \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    Feb 8, 2018 at 4:35
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @KRyan Even footing then. ;-) I was frustrated enough that my low-level villains weren't challenging the PCs that I combed the potion options and eventually allowed the dwarven injector into the game: bad guys are worse when equipped with 300 gp of potions they can use. The injector singlehandedly brought potions back as a valuable resource. It's awesome even if the only potion in it is a potion of stand — so that if the wearer is tripped, the potion bottle may break (1 in 4), and the wearer is instantly upright again… off-turn, right now, and no +4 for the tripper. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 8, 2018 at 5:39

The only rule available relevant to getting a potion into your hand (so that you can then spend a standard action to drink it) is this:

Manipulate an Item

In most cases, moving or manipulating an item is a move action.

This includes retrieving or putting away a stored item, picking up an item, moving a heavy object, and opening a door. Examples of this kind of action, along with whether they incur an attack of opportunity, are given in Table: Move Actions.

Potions are not explicitly mentioned, but then potions aren’t mentioned anywhere in the action rules aside from the standard action for drinking a potion (or applying an oil).

At best, you could argue that a potion in a belt or bandoleer counts as a “weapon-like object,” allowing it to be treated like a weapon for the purposes of drawing:

Draw or Sheathe a Weapon

Drawing a weapon so that you can use it in combat, or putting it away so that you have a free hand, requires a move action. This action also applies to weapon-like objects carried in easy reach, such as wands.

The advantage here is that

If you have a base attack bonus of +1 or higher, you may draw a weapon as a free action combined with a regular move.

So you can combine that move action with actual movement (so long as you have BAB +1), but it still takes a move action.

And then, yes, you also have to spend a standard action drinking it. There is no suggestion that the standard action to drink a potion includes drawing it or that the time spent drawing it should count against the time required to drink it.

You can improve matters, arguably, with Quick Draw, arguing that potions are weapon-like and then that Quick Draw applies to weapon-like objects the same as the drawing/sheathing rules do (the Normal section of the Quick Draw feat supports that position, but that’s far from conclusive).

All of which is to say that potions are basically not viable in combat; they take too long to retrieve and drink to use when things are attacking you. They are only useful between combats, or before combat if you get a chance to prepare. Combine that with their high cost, and you have a strong incentive to never use potions at all. Wands and wondrous items are far superior choices, since they can be re-used, and also can be used without your hands (since wands can go in wand chambers and wondrous items are typically worn).


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .