10
\$\begingroup\$

This question was inspired by this question about dealing with a creature protected by the Invulnerability spell.

Empower spell reads:

When you roll damage for a spell, you can spend 1 sorcery point to reroll a number of the damage dice up to your Charisma modifier

Sleep says that...

This spell sends creatures into a magical slumber. Roll 5d8: the total is how many hit points of creatures this spell will effect.

In the case of a single creature, the sorcerer is rolling for the sleep effect against the creature's amount of hit points (if one can isolate the targeted creature).

Is the fact that the sleep spell is affecting that creature's hit points equivalent to rolling damage, or is that a stretch too far in finding a creative use for the empower metamagic feat?

Answers that address Rules as Written and/or Rules as Intended and/or Rules as Fun are within the scope of this question.

\$\endgroup\$
0

2 Answers 2

19
\$\begingroup\$

RAW - No, empower cannot affect the roll in sleep

Each weapon, spell, and harmful monster ability specifies the damage it deals. You roll the damage die or dice, add any modifiers, and apply the damage to your target.

Damage dice, both logically and as indicated by the rules, are only rolled when damage is being determined by some effect.

The sleep spell does not do any damage. The dice, as you point out, are only there to determine "how many hit points of creatures this spell can affect". Therefore, there are no damage dice involved with the spell.

Advice on Houseruling/Rules as Fun

If you are considering allowing this at your table, I have some points to consider. Make sure that you are willing to extend the empower ability to other similar non-damage spell rolls or that you are clear that you are limiting it to just sleep. If you fail to do the latter, the player might assume the former and expect the exception to work for other spells with non-damage rolls.

Just allowing it for sleep does not seem highly problematic, and non-damage spell dice rolls are, to my knowledge, fairly uncommon. So allowing this is unlikely to have dire consequences in your game.

It is worth noting that sleep can be a very powerful spell at low levels in the right situations. So, as a DM allowing this, prepare to have the spell hit more often. This is a spell that can end encounters if used properly (especially single enemy encounters). Of course the same could be said of many spells, but it is something that you should be conscious of.

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast: I frustrated my DM quite a bit with it actually. So it seems to have been more powerful at my table. My point is not to say: don't make the house rule, but to say make sure you understand the implications of it. Not you obviously since I think you understand this very well indeed, but for anybody else who reads the answer. I did edit a sentence to make it less of a definitive statement. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 19:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast: Agreed completely. I didn't make a recommendation one way or the other here mainly because I myself haven't tested it nor do I know how it would play out. But I still wanted to give some guidance because you requested it and in case it was something others were considering. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 19:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ Nice edit, I'll clean upmy comments. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 19:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ "be conscious"! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 5, 2018 at 1:56
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ The primary usage of dice rolls (by the caster) for non-damage spells that I can think of are for healing spells. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented Mar 5, 2018 at 3:30
4
\$\begingroup\$

Yeah, that's beyond a stretch. Hit points and damage are distinct and separate concepts, which means that something that just counts hit points without causing damage isn't damage or a damage roll.

Since sleep causes no damage and involves no damage roll, it can't be affected by the sorcerer's Empower.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Not sure if you saw the coda to my answer at the link -- I was pretty sure that it won't -- but I figured I'd ask anyway since someone else may have this same question. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 18:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Korvin I did! It felt like that kind of question too. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 19:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .