13
\$\begingroup\$

How can I smoothly bring in a new player and character with little or no notice? I run a semi-public game shop pathfinder game, and I sometimes have people show up to play I hadn't planned on. Often enough they have a character, but that character may not mesh with the existing party or setting. How can I smoothly make the necessary character adjustments and bring the player on board to the game? I can handle the story adjustments, and my existing players know and are somewhat prepared for accepted new players on the fly.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If I'm reading this right, you're looking at things other than the "getting to know each other" encounter. Is that correct? Character, party balance, encounter rebalancing...? \$\endgroup\$
    – AceCalhoon
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 16:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AceCalhoon that is correct, and mainly from the point of view of giving the player enough information to play, and how to have them adjust the character to fit ... \$\endgroup\$
    – C. Ross
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 16:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ I still don't understand what the problem is. Apart from explaining them what the party lacks in terms of roles and explaining to them what the setting is like, what other information do they need that you can't give them on the spot? \$\endgroup\$
    – OddCore
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @OddCore A I don't require people switch roles/classes, just adapt backstory and setting specific stuff. Setting is the biggest thing, but also the style of play (break down the door vs inquire) and some party rules (restricted looting, etc). \$\endgroup\$
    – C. Ross
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you looking for answers that are more mechanical or narrative in nature? \$\endgroup\$
    – Pulsehead
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 23:01

7 Answers 7

11
\$\begingroup\$

I didn't have an answer for this, but then I read this great answer by Paraic Mulgrew and it reminded me of somethign I learnt in college: Tuckman model

It's the tuckman model! Yay!

The Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965, who maintained that these phases are all necessary and inevitable in order for the team to grow, to face up to challenges, to tackle problems, to find solutions, to plan work, and to deliver results.

  1. Forming - or Get That Guy In

    Have some model or plan, or McGuffin worked into the plot. This is very subjective on the party and current plot, but ideas include:

    • The employer wants more people on the job
    • The item they find teleports in/has released a person from Imprisonment
    • The party is so famous people want to join

    This should all just work for getting that person into the group, in a way that back stories allow, and doesn't clash horribly with the current plot. Work out before play starts whether they're sticking around, coming back etc. Be firm, if they say I dunno, I might be back? let them know if they aren't back next time (unless you can make this sort of thing work) they can't carry on. It could cause too many problems.

  2. Storming - Get Yourself Heard

    This stage is where conflicts naturally arise, and can make for an interesting story! It's where the new character voices their opinions and choices to the group, and people agree/disagree.

    • They want to take charge!
    • They want to approach the problems from a different angle.
    • A rivalry is set up.

    The important thing is to make sure this conflict doesn't happen out of the game. That is to say, make sure any serious conflict is sorted out out-side of the game, before it happens in-game. This should ideally happen in the first session with the new guy, so all the cards are laid out, so to speak.

  3. Norming - or Get Everyone To Get Along

    This is where routines are set-up, people get to know each other, trust is formed. It's a (hopefully) natural conclusion of storming. If it occurs in storming, it resolves in norming. This can happen after a break or after the first session, and I suggest sitting down and talking to everyone about how they feel the new character fits in. Things to ascertain:

    • Who is now in charge?
    • How have the goals been changed?
    • What do people think of the new character?
    • Why does he want to stay?

    Make sure this is quick so as not to take up valuable roleplaying time. Perhaps a good idea now is to look at how people can integrate the character into the group, once conflicts are over.

  4. Performing - Get Your Game On.

    This where you want to end up (though cycling back to storming can be interesting). Once you're here you should have a cohesive group dynamic, and you can just play on but there are some other things you want to try and decide:

    • How would you handle it differently?
    • What new role does this new character play?
    • How can you make it easier/more fun next time?

    Hopefully this is where you end up. There's not a lot to say really, enjoy your game!

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ It may sound OCD, but why is the graph going from right to left? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 13, 2012 at 3:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Mikalichov I have no idea. I'd have mirrored it but then no one could read it.... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 13, 2012 at 8:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Great answer, other than insisting on knowing if they will be coming back. Depending on the nature of the game, drop in/drop out might not be that hard at all. Think of every superhero crossover where they work together for a bit, split ways, and may or may not team up again. Even in real life people transfer in for a bit and leave and may or may not come back. This is even more common with outside consultants that act as "hired guns" and might or might not be called again... \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 7, 2012 at 23:26
6
\$\begingroup\$

I have a "Welcome to the group" document, which I prepare before every new campaign. I give copies to all players, and when a new player joins, I review the document to ensure that it still describes the campaign accurately.

This document describes:

  • The setting
  • House rules
  • My GMing style
  • Etiquette expectations, such as:
    • Keep your cell phone in your pocket unless you get an important call.
    • If you wander out of the room during combat, we'll "hold" your turn and continue in initiative order unless you've given instructions.
    • Please arrive on time; we don't have a long "warm-up" period.
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for intro document, especially for house rules and Etiquette! \$\endgroup\$
    – Rob
    Commented May 8, 2012 at 14:11
4
\$\begingroup\$

I would recommend that you suggest some minor justifications for the character and his/her background that places them in the setting. Using character backstories (as proposed by multiple gaming sources) will give you a deep source of rational for where this character may have come from, no matter how exotic the build. That should suffice for the first, impromptu session.

Afterwards, I would talk with the player and see if they are interested in attending regularly. If so, take some time to coordinate a better backstory that furthers the group's story line. If their character seems too exotic for the mood/tone of your game, now would be a good time to address the issue with the player. Then they can make a more informed choice as to whether to continue to attend.

If the character is just a bit quirky, use that fluff as a storyline springboard and rationize potential relationships to the campaigns villians, organizations, and infrastructure.

In short, roll with it the first game using pre generated backstories and then afterward, work with the player to invest them into the game is a more seemless manner.

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

You have to take this into account with your campaign background. We ran a multi referee campaign where characters where allows to roam from adventure to adventure by different referees called New Gallo. One of the premises of this was that each session had to start and finished at the Port of New Christina. New character arrived on the ship from the Old World and had to bring everything the needed with them. Resupply was almost impossible, it was either in New Christina or the surrounding wilderness or it may takes weeks or months to arrive. I think a similar idea would work for any location like a large city or trading post near a large forest with ancient ruins (Pavis springs to mind).

We did set specific rules around character creation at the start, but these where reduced over time (although no evil was never dropped).

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

First, I'd say it mostly depends on the level of your campaign. Since high level characters can have a more profound impact on your plot & encounters they are imho much more difficult to account for, especially if they are spellcasters. So at some point you may run into a level range where conflicts and extensive modifications are unavoidable.

Anyway, I would suggest several things that could help you handle such a situation.

Explain the rules

Ideally, you have at least 20 to 30 minutes to take the new player aside and in a few words explain the social contract of your group. Explain how you run your game, what you and the other players expect in terms of behavior and style of play and answer any questions he has. Also give him a run down about the agreed on house rules at your table.

This is also the perfect time to start adapting the character, since at this time you can focus on the new player and help him with the mechanical aspects or the background.

Adapt the character

You mentioned that the eventually existing characters "may not mesh with the existing party or setting", so I assume that the difficulties lie primarily with either the type of character ("But I want to play an evil, greedy assassin that is out to rob your followers of Pelor!") or with his abilities ("What do you mean I can't play my divination specialist in your mystery investigation campaign?"). In either case I think the only option is to ask the player to change the character type/alignment/background according to your suggestions and/or remove the problematic mechanical elements (feats, spells, items, ...).

In my experience it's difficult to introduce a new player to the action right from the start, but in this case this is actually a minor advantage since that gives the player some time in which he can modify his character. Ideally, while doing so the player should also write down the shorthand for each feat's/spell's/item's rulebook behind each rule element, so that you can quickly check if the modified character is okay or clashes with some other restrictions.

However, not always the player is able or willing to make the modifications without basically redoing the whole character and losing lots of effective game time. In that case your emergency measures would take over.

Emergency measures!

If the situation you describe occurs quite often (e.g., more than once every 10 games) I'd say it'd be a good idea to build a stack of pregenerated characters for exactly such players. Because the characters were built by you, there is no risk that they have an item/spell or something else that busts your plot or overly simplifies your encounters, and there is little risk that the characters' background or personality conflicts with the other players.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

Start with Freud's "Tell me about your mother" GM to character as a person (as opposed to a sheet of numbers). Once you get the chuckle over slide into asking things like the character's potential background, it doesn't hurt to phrase the questions in a way that leads the answer like "Do you think your fighter was more of the sort to work his way up in the city/royal guards or army... or more of the type to fight to protect small villages across the countryside in need of help? That alone lets you peg their character as something military/militia or something mercenary/avenger hero type Twist things around for different classes to make the questions relevant. in the span of 5-10 minutes you go from "I like swords!" to an interesting character you can weave into the plot tapestry going forward to really draw people in with one of those campaigns that skip the nameless evil to something everyone wants to be involved with. try to squeeze in questions about things like goals and/or motives when applicable & don't hesitate to give out something minor that's either so trivial as to be irrelevant (but cool), or likely to be replaced soon enough like a Masterwork+1 doodad relevant to the backstory created in those 5-10 minutes.

If you do the leading questions right, you can pretty much drop them seamlessly into the path of your group without the even realizing that you just had the shape their character into the shape you kinda needed plotwise.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

If its a public game where people can join andl eave at will, you need to make every game episodic. Beginning and ending, with a story arc for longtime players. End at a point where it makes sense for players to pick up a stranger. Inn, church, popular adventuring dungeon etc.

If this is a pickup game and people are bringing characters, don't force the guy who obviously doesnt want commitment to commit. Roll with the punches. Maybe he's a foreigner. Make him tell you why he's there with an on the fly background. Two sentences i always ask at conventions.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .