8
\$\begingroup\$

I am currently working out a Pixie PC character with one of my players, but we've run into a problem. Pixies being tiny creatures can't carry much of anything (especially with 2(-4) Strength). This makes the use of almost any items near impossible, they couldn't drink a health potion or even lift it at all.

The player suggested that the character gains a natural ability as part of being a pixie that everything they touch shrinks down to an appropriate size at will. Would this be fair? Is this over or under compensating? If it is, can anyone thing of an alternative solution to the "everything is giant and I cant use it" problem?

The PC has the exact same stats as a regular pixie such as ability scores and AC, as well as their magic resistance, superior invisibility and innate spellcasting.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Can you describe how you've homebrewed the pixie PC race a bit, so we know what abilities and statistics the PC already has? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 31, 2018 at 14:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Rubiksmoose We tried to make it as close to an actual pixie as we can. We are thinking of making them a druid, but we decided to work that out after we solved this issue. \$\endgroup\$
    – Youjay
    Mar 31, 2018 at 14:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks. That should help guide discussions a bit I think. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 31, 2018 at 14:32

2 Answers 2

9
\$\begingroup\$

The pixie should be able to use most items without issue already, but your solution should help

Pixies can lift items up to 30 lbs

A pixie's carrying capacity should be 15 lbs (2 (STR) * 15 / 2 (Tiny)) and they can lift/push/drag 30 lbs. This means the pixie should be able to at least lift potions and other items without issue as long as they weighed less than 30 lbs. So, as far as lifting goes, you may not have as much of an issue as you think you do.

As far as using the items after lifting, nothing in the rules prevents it. Pixies stand "barely a foot tall" so the pixie may be trying to drink from something which could be 1/4 to 3/4 of their body length depending on the size of your potion bottles. This is probably going to look humorous but there is nothing wrong with it really.

Pixie-sized loot is still potentially a large issue though

Even though pixies can lift and use a bit heavier of items than you seem to think in your question, there is still the issue that pixies are going to have a hard time finding any kind of weapons or items that are sized for their use. This is going to put them at a disadvantage versus the rest of the party potentially unless the DM specifically provides solutions for it. For example. providing the correct loot could involve granting magic items which could resize to the pixie, making the pixie buy custom-made weapons/items/armor at towns, or giving the party lots of tiny monsters wielding tiny weapons and armor for them to loot. If this is something you don't want to deal with, I think your proposed solution is probably going to be a good way to go.

Adding a shrinking ability

There doesn't seem to be anything inherently overpowered by giving the pixie this ability. One guideline you may want to look at is treating any items as if they had been reduced using the reduce spell including a 1d4 reduction in weapon damage, and a 7/8 reduction in weight.

If you are set on making this homebrew work smoothly and are trying to avoid the above situation then it should be a good solution. Make sure the player knows that you are trying to accommodate their character choice as best you can and that it may involve some tweaking down the line. Tell them that if the ability is discovered to be a major issue sometime down the line, that you reserve the right to tweak and change it to preserve fun at the table.

The toothpick assassin and related issues

For example, there is one case that comes to mind (via @doppelgreener) that highlights an instance where the power might be abused and that the DM should be aware of going into this: the toothpick assassin. The idea behind this strategy is the pixie grabs a spear, flies into the mouth of an opposing creature and down their throat, then lets go of the spear. Upon letting go, the spear grows back to normal size and potentially strikes a hearty blow against the enemy (probably instakilling it though this would be outside of the rules).

As a DM you might consider deciding how you feel about this kind of strategy and discussing with your players ahead of time to head off any issues. It is not clear even how the rules would handle such an attempt at attacking so, if allowed, it will probably result in a lot of DM rulings on how to resolve things. You can let the players decide what kind of power level they want to deal with. However, remind them that, if this strategy is allowed, enemies and NPCs will also be free to use it against the PCs. Coming to an agreement or making a ruling before this becomes an issue might be the best way to handle this.

A related issue that the DM will have to decide will be how thrown weapons would work. Technically, any weapon thrown by the pixie would grow back to normal size as soon as it left the pixie's grasp (and thus do normal damage assuming you are using the reduced damage as mentioned above). As DM you can simply rule that projectiles simply stay the same size or allow it to increase in size if you don't think it matters.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Simple solution: the shrinking is permanent. Then the toothpick assassin and thrown weapons problems go away. \$\endgroup\$
    – Asher
    Mar 31, 2018 at 21:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Asher: If the DM wants to implement that, sure. All I'm doing is pointing out the potential issues that may occur. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 31, 2018 at 21:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Rubiksmoose well, yes. And I was pointing out a way to prevent those specific issues. I assume since the question carries the "homebrew" tag already that there's no reason to use the RAW Reduce/Enlarge rules without modification. Reasonably, a pixie would be able to shrink loose, uncontrolled objects (i.e. no buildings, no enemy armor while they wear it, etc.) permanently to their size. It would solve both the equipment size issue and the issues that would come with a temporary Reduce, as well as allow the pixie to shrink things as a prank, as fey like to do. \$\endgroup\$
    – Asher
    Mar 31, 2018 at 21:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Rubiksmoose so maybe I could say, it shrinks to size at will of the pixie but if another creature notices, they can prevent it will a strength verse charisma contest roll. will that fix any toothpick assassin problems? \$\endgroup\$
    – Youjay
    Mar 31, 2018 at 23:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Youjay I actually personally don't think that is going to be a good solution honestly. It sounds like it would add a bunch of complexity and I don't think it makes that much sense mechanically. Personally, what I would do is talk with my players and just agree that neither of us would abuse the mechanic and to only use it to allow the pixie to use equipment. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 31, 2018 at 23:24
3
\$\begingroup\$

I can say I am playing a pixie char in two different campaigns. I go out of my way not to abuse my pixie magic so that I can continue to play the game and not meta too much. Pixie magic is wonderful for say picking up a napkin and some string from a human vendor and then converting it into a hammock to sleep in, use pixie magic to shrink it, then release the magic at camp to hang it up. My one character is a 9th level rogue and has used arrows for much of combat, but she makes her own. My solution would be if you don't have the concentration to release the pixie magic the item can't return to normal size for a while, or that the item requires time to return to it's normal size depending on starting size. A ball bearing would return to size almost immidiately while a greataxe may take several minutes to be able to regain it's size. There are work arounds to the pixie magic to make it fair, but just for the privilage of playing an out of the box race, the players should not abuse little tricks to get ahead.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .