Can Special Attacks be used to perform a Cross-Up?

The rules in the combat section state (emphasis mine):

If a combatant can jump forward 2 Ranges to attack with a Basic Move and land exactly at Range 0, and then chooses to spend an additional 1 FS, the combatant can do a Cross-Up Attack.

A Basic Move is, by definition, not a Special Move, and thus cannot have Elements or Liabilities associated with it.

However, there is a Liability named Cross-Up Liability that can be added to Special Moves that reads (emphasis mine):

This move can only be used if it is used in a Cross-Up situation. Otherwise, it automatically misses.

Also by definition, a Liability can only be added to Special Moves, and not to Basic Moves.

How does this interact? It appears that it is possible to make a Special Move that can only be used as a Cross-Up, but it also appears that Special Moves cannot be used to Cross-Up at all.

Does the Liability also grant the ability to Cross-Up? (Generally, Liabilities are strictly negative effects, and such a beneficial effect would require an Element.) Does the word "situation" mean that it can be used in a similar scenario, but does not gain the usual benefits of being a Cross-Up? Is there another way to make Special Moves able to Cross-Up? Are one of the rules incorrect?

  • \$\begingroup\$ What is the logical chain that leads you up to the "Special Moves cannot be used to Cross-Up at all" ? I am not seeing it in the rules you provide here. The first statement I would parse as "If you are able to do A but choose to spend additional resources, you can instead do B". No limitations on B here specifically. \$\endgroup\$ – Nox May 10 '18 at 14:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Nox I agree that the wording could be interpreted that way, but the section that is from is the only section that discusses Cross-Up Attacks (in its own section labeled as such). I see it as saying "The way - and the only way - to do B is to do A." I'm taking this from the context that there is no other explanation of what a Cross-Up Attack is in the book, AFAIK. \$\endgroup\$ – Southpaw Hare May 10 '18 at 15:00

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.