During my last game, a player tried to have his character make a miraculous escape, only to wind up splattered instead. I'll provide some details, but the gist of my question is whether my ruling on action economy was incorrect.

The PC, a Level 9 sorcerer with the Quicken Spell metamagic feature, started his turn chained up in the bottom of a rowboat. His party was in the water trying to rescue him from his captors, but he was unaware of both this and the knowledge that the great white shark that had just taken a bite out of the boat was technically on his side. His plan was as follows:

  1. Cast dimension door, transporting himself instantly 500 feet in the air.
  2. Cast feather fall and float downward.
  3. Wait out the rest of the fight safely overhead.

Now, this particular player believes in an antagonistic relationship between player and DM (he's the kind of fellow who believes that when you win, you've beaten the DM, and when he's DM it's his job to kill the players as fairly as possible). As such, he refused to tell me the next part of his plan until he had found out whether the current part had worked, so I wouldn't have time to ruin it. Which meant that his plan played out as follows:

  1. His character successfully casts dimension door, reappearing 500 feet over the boat. I ask if he's sure, and he insists.
  2. His attempt to cast feather fall fails, and he plummets 500 feet. I prepare to roll damage, thinking that he'll hit the water. The player grumbles.
  3. One of the other players reminds me that the boat is being held in place by the shark. Both the antagonistic player and I immediately realize his character is going to hit the boat, not the water.
  4. Shouting ensues. I eventually lay out the reasoning below, and then roll damage. His character deals 76 points of damage to himself, the boat, and the NPCs that had been holding him hostage. This is enough to kill his character instantly due to massive damage.

Because this reasoning killed a PC, I'd like to be sure that I have a valid interpretation of the rules, namely, whether you can cast a spell and react by casting a spell on the same turn. I provided as support that you can't the following bit from the Player's Handbook, which specifically references spells as bonus actions:

You can’t cast another spell during the same turn, except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action.

I reasoned that if you can't cast another spell after you cast a spell as a bonus action, that means even as a reaction. I also specified that it was specific to his turn, as it mentions, and that if he had fallen on someone else's turn it would have been quite possible to use feather fall. To drive that point home I likened it to trying to cast magic missile to hit yourself and then reacting to yourself by casting shield, which I would also disallow. Is this right? Can you cast a spell with an action or bonus action and then cast a spell as a reaction, all on your turn? Or did this particular PC legitimately outsmart himself?

For The Record:

  • In my games, players take turns in sequence over the course of 6 seconds. I understand the logic of simultaneous turns, but unless everyone agreed in advance what their actions were and then the round was resolved all at once, it wouldn't work at my table... and as you can see, some players don't even want to discuss all of their turn at once.

  • In my games, falling occurs on the player's turn, unless they are forced to fall by someone else's action, kind of like movement. Not worried about this but, as the player agrees that this works (and has taken advantage of the rule before).

  • By a non-coincidence, falling in my games occurs at the rate of 500 feet per round. Since the falling occurred on his turn, he went up and came down all during the same turn.

  • \$\begingroup\$ For those curious whether Quicken Spell plays a role, literally yes and no. He asked whether using it would change my answer (it did not). \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 16, 2018 at 21:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast I'll add that to the end for you, though it isn't the falling part I'm worried about. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 16, 2018 at 21:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related and possible dupe of this counterspell question. There are several dupes similar regarding counterspell on your own turn after you've cast a spell. But duplicate answers are not duplicate questions. \$\endgroup\$
    – NotArch
    Commented May 16, 2018 at 21:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @NautArch Definitely related, though I didn't spot it on my first search (thanks, by the eay, that ruling is helpful) and it doesn't answer whether you could react to your own spell with another spell. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 16, 2018 at 21:45
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Why did they fail to cast feather fall? \$\endgroup\$
    – MikeQ
    Commented May 16, 2018 at 21:58

4 Answers 4


You can normally take reactions on your own turn, which includes reacting to things you are doing to yourself.

Note though that Featherfall isn't reacting to a spell you cast; it's reacting to you falling. It shouldn't make a difference whether you step off a cliff or cast a spell; one of its designed uses is to save you from splattering when you find yourself in the air by your own choice. (The other is, obviously, when you find yourself in the air by another's choice)

However, the specific bit about Bonus actions does apply here. Since it's still the player's same turn, he could not cast Feather Fall if he cast Dimension Door as a bonus action. But he should be able to do it, had he used Dimension Door as a normal action.

For another example; while it's silly to Magic Missile yourself in the face and then Shield yourself, it's perfectly valid to Magic Missile someone else and then Shield yourself when you realize your intended target has some form of Spell Reflection.

As long as you can cast spells, you can cast those spells as a Reaction on your turn, even if the original trigger for your Reaction spell is something you did to yourself.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Yep. The only rule that might apply here is if you cast a spell as a bonus action on your turn, you can't cast any other spell - including a reaction spell - on that turn unless it's a cantrip. But I don't really see why the character in question would bother to quicken Dimension Door while doing this, unless he really wants to do something else with his action... \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented May 16, 2018 at 22:18
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ This Sage Advice post backs up this ruling sageadvice.eu/2016/05/17/… \$\endgroup\$
    – TNgo
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 0:25
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Ywah, just like you can action surge cast two spells, unless you cast a spell as a bonus action in which case you cannot anymore. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pliny
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 2:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I will add that, in case anybody is like me and wants absolute certainty, a previous question indicates that a quickened spell definitely does count as a "bonus action spell" for the purposes of this rule. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2018 at 13:15
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This is the answer I'm going with. I'm not happy about it, though. I haven't decided if I'll be eating humble pie or crow, but it'll certainly taste awful. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 18, 2018 at 0:03

He should have been able to cast feather fall.

After my original post I read this and changed my mind on my answer. (This is my original answer.)

Per the PHB:

Reactions Some spells can be cast as reactions. These spells take a fraction of a second to bring about and are cast in response to some event. If a spell can be cast as a reaction, the spell description tells you exactly when you can do so.

Using the specific vs general rules this is a specific rule that governs spells with a casting time of 1 reaction. After he cast dimension door the trigger for his reaction was met and he should have been allowed to cast feather fall.


Short Answer: YES, you can react to your own spell.

  • He should have been able to cast both spells. See clarification below.


  • The entire sequence should have been ruled against and he should have started over.

There are numerous problems here.

The biggest problem in this scenario is the relationship between you and the player. I know you addressed it, but that doesn't mean it's not the main problem.

Reactions and reaction spells are allowed on your turn. There are explicit rulings allowing a wizard to cast a fireball which is then counterspelled and use their reaction to counterspell the original counterspell. So by RAW (and clarified by rulings) you should be able to shield yourself from your own magic missile. However, in this question, Feather Fall is a reaction to falling, not Dimension Door. The question in the title does not match the problem you've laid out.

You said that "For those curious whether Quicken Spell plays a role, literally yes and no. He asked whether using it would change my answer (it did not)."

  1. If the player casts dimension door with their action, by RAW they can use their reaction to cast Feather Fall.
  2. If the player casts a quickened dimension door with their action, by RAW they can only cast cantrips for the rest of their turn (including before the dimension door). In such a case you could not cast Feather Fall (a non-cantrip) as a reaction on the same turn.

By RAW you are wrong, since without the quickened spell (#1) the bonus action spell rule does not come into play, whereas with it (#2) the rule applies and spoils the fun.

The bonus action spell rule is very flawed. I consider it one of the worst rules in 5e because it makes no sense when you consider all of the scenarios where you can cast multiple non-cantrips vs. the scenarios where the rule comes into play. I will probably be rewriting that rule specifically for my next table. (Clearly this paragraph is my opinion, but is on-topic for the circumstances of this question.)

Since there is some confusion in some of the other answers and comments, let me be very clear. The bonus action spell rule only limits spellcasting if a spell was cast as a bonus action. It has no bearing whatsoever on casting 2 spells with 2 actions or with action & reaction.

For a player and DM with a good relationship, such a ruling should be clarified in advance of resolving the turn. If the character says they want to cast a spell in such a way and then cast another spell, they should be ruled against and allowed to reconsider (so long as no other creatures have already acted due to the first spell).

Finally, you may be holding to strict RAW (possibly due to your antagonizing player), but you have completely ruled against Rules as Fun. He burned 2 spell slots to commit suicide. That's not a fun game.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ He burned 2 spell slots to commit suicide. That's not a fun game In some circumstances (at a generally light hearted table) that can be hilarious. "what? I just fell to my death?" All players begin to giggle at the bizarre outcome ... In other cases, it's a huge downer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2018 at 14:49
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ If he hadn't insisted on getting step-by-step rulings, I'd have simply told him that sequence wouldn't work (According to my understanding at the time, by now I'd probably rule differently), and I strongly suggested that he pick a different end point- but I won't alter the end result of a ruling, due to issues with this very player and his efforts to reverse every ruling he didn't like after the fact. At this point, he's getting an apology, though- and I'll have to be careful there, too, he's been trying to insist I consult Jeremy Crawford on every questionable call. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2018 at 15:23
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @TheVagrantDog I didn't see this anywhere else in this thread but, in my opinion, you should ask a completely different new question: "How do I deal with a player who wants to treat my role as DM as adversarial?" He really should not be, and I think the answers there might help your game significantly. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2018 at 17:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ ...unless you like the adversarial-but-fair play. Some people do. It's clear that he's one of them. If you're enjoying it, that's great. If you're not havign fun wiht it, then yeah, it's another useful question to ask. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ben Barden
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 18:41
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ "The entire sequence should have been ruled against and he should have started over" - This. Step back from the metagaming for a second and consider that in-universe the characters probably have an intuitive understanding of what they can and cannot do, magic-wise. A spellcaster would just know that "hey, it's physically impossible for me to use my magic this way", and wouldn't attempt such a thing in the first place. A player who interprets the rules wrongly and then has a character do something entirely implausible as a result should be allowed a do-over. \$\endgroup\$
    – aroth
    Commented May 18, 2018 at 3:08

He would most likely die.

You correct. As per the PHB

You can’t cast another spell during the same turn, except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action.

Feather fall is a level 1 spell and has a cast time of 1 reaction, so he would not have been able to cast it on his turn.

So the next thing to determine would be would he have time to cast it before he hit the boat?

Per XGtE:

When you fall from a great height you instantly descend up to 500 feet. If you're still falling on your next turn you descend up to 500 feet at the end of that turn. This process continues until the fall ends.

By this rule he would have hit the boat on his turn and would have never gotten the opportunity to use a reaction on anybody else's turn.

It should be noted that is is an optional rule.

  • \$\begingroup\$ That is exactly the rule I use, for the record. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 16, 2018 at 22:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ @TheVagrantDog Upon further reading I added another answer because I believe that this answer is wrong based on the information I posted here. rpg.stackexchange.com/a/122757/44027 \$\endgroup\$
    – Duck
    Commented May 16, 2018 at 22:22
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ This ruling you quoted only applies to casting a spell as a bonus action - it is not even a general ruling. You can still cast 2 spells in the same turn as an action, for example, if you have Action Surge (from Fighter). You can also cast a spell as an action and then another spell as a reaction. Basically, you only can't cast 2 spells in the same turn if one of them is a bonus action. \$\endgroup\$
    – HellSaint
    Commented May 16, 2018 at 22:57
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Why couldn't he cast both spells on the same turn? He didn't cast a bonus action spell, so the rule you quoted (which applies specifically to bonus action spells) doesn't apply. \$\endgroup\$
    – RonLugge
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 4:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is the correct answer. You can only cast two spells in the same turn if one of them is a cantrip. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 17, 2018 at 12:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .