3
\$\begingroup\$

Shield Warrior

You have mastered the art of using shields as weapons. You gain the following benefits:

  • You can benefit from up to 2 shields (including stacking their bonuses to AC).

  • When using a shield as an improvised weapon, you have proficiency with it.

  • You can don or doff two shields when you would normally only be able to don or doff one.

How does this compare to existing RAW feats, balance-wise?

Known interactions

Shield Master

  • Completely non-redundant with Shield Warrior
  • Possible balance issue with adding the AC bonus of two shields to Dex saves when combined with Shield Warrior

Tavern Brawler

  • Proficiency with improvised weapons overlaps with Shield Warrior's proficiency with improvised weapons (shields)

Dual Wielder

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is the point of it to be able to create a mini PC version of Fire Giant Dreadnoughts from VGtM? \$\endgroup\$ – J.E Jun 15 '18 at 13:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @J.E That's one example that I had in mind, yeah. But the FGD has lots of abilities a PC with this wouldn't. \$\endgroup\$ – Vigil Jun 15 '18 at 13:31
4
\$\begingroup\$

It's not overpowered under most circumstances

Assuming non-magical shields, it compares fairly well with Dual Wielder. Dual Wielder gives +1 AC and allows two-handed fighting with non-light weapons. Your feat gives 3 AC more when shields are held but doesn't allow two-weapon fighting and indeed only works when the character wields a shield, which is a pretty bad weapon even if you have proficiency with it. It's a fair trade.

I expect it can become overpowered when the character with this feat has access to multiple magical shields with convenient synergy, eg. Shield of Missile attraction and Arrow-Catching Shield.

It's not a good feat

Giving away offensive capability for defensive capability (in this case, by dual-wielding shields) tends to draw out combats because it reduces the expected damage output of both sides. Balanced or not, I think that's a good enough reason to not introduce this feat in your game.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Is a warcaster cleric (Holy symbol on a shield) a consideration when looking at balance? No real loss of offence but hugely improved AC. \$\endgroup\$ – SeriousBri Jun 15 '18 at 12:05
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @SeriousBri wouldn't the two shields interfere with certain spells (mainly the ones with somatic but no material components)? \$\endgroup\$ – J.E Jun 15 '18 at 12:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ @J.E possibly, to be honest I have never played at a table that even considers v,s,m in normal play, which only increases the power of this mobile one man shield wall. \$\endgroup\$ – SeriousBri Jun 15 '18 at 13:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ Wielding two shields not only makes somatic components impossible, it also makes doing anything at all with your hands impossible. ANd it takes an action to remove a shield (which, how do you do that if you don't have a free hand?) \$\endgroup\$ – NautArch Jun 15 '18 at 13:33
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @NautArch I took magical shields into brief consideration (see the middle paragraph) \$\endgroup\$ – kviiri Jun 15 '18 at 14:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.