6
\$\begingroup\$

Can any creature with the "elf" subtype (such as the third-party race Houri) qualify for character options which require the character to be an elf (such as the Breadth of Experience feat), or are such options limited to full-blooded elves (and creatures with the Elf Blood racial trait)?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @KRyan Actually I'm now not sure this is a pure duplicate. Though the example race given (half-elf) can explicitly take elf racial options because of the racial trait, it doesn't necessary follow that all creatures with subtype Elf can take such options, seeing as the subtype applies to "elves and creatures related to elves". Are there any creatures with the Elf subtype that are merely "related to" elves and may not have the Elf Blood racial trait? \$\endgroup\$ – Carcer Jul 8 '18 at 17:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Carcer I think they are all either elves or half-elves: pathfinderwiki.com/wiki/Category:Elf_subtype_creatures \$\endgroup\$ – David Coffron Jul 8 '18 at 17:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DavidCoffron Paizo's own bestiary index is probably the only resource guaranteed to have every creature Paizo's published in it - unfortunately its subtype filtering is almost completely useless because there's no way to exclude creatures that don't have one of the standard subtypes, so checking the contents is a slog. \$\endgroup\$ – Carcer Jul 8 '18 at 17:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ (While it's interesting because it allows making untrained Profession skill checks, that the Breadth of Knowledge feat allows making untrained Knowledge skill checks is redundant: anyone can do that… except that the maximum result is 10. Just sayin' if you're lookin' at the feat for that aspect, don't.) \$\endgroup\$ – Hey I Can Chan Jul 8 '18 at 17:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ With the edit, it’s a lot clearer what the difference is. It probably didn’t need to be closed at all, but now it’s a better, clearer question, and it wasn’t closed long (probably didn’t miss out on any answers), so I call that a win. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jul 8 '18 at 19:29
2
\$\begingroup\$

Not necessarily

The elf subtype includes...

elves and creatures related to elves

Creatures related to elves are not necessarily elves and would therefore not always meet the prerequisite for Breadth of Experience.

Prerequisites: Dwarf, elf, or gnome...

As you seem to recognize, Half-elves (and some other creatures) can meet these prequisites because of the Elf Blood trait...

Half-elves count as both elves and humans for any effect related to race.

...but without being a literal elf or having a trait like this, they do not.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

Possibly not by RAW - but you probably want to rule affirmatively in some cases

There isn't a strictly a clear definition on what qualifies a creature as being a capital-E Elf, but we can extrapolate from what rules do exist.

The "elf" subtype itself is very simple, and states only that:

This subtype is applied to elves and creatures related to elves. Creatures with the elf subtype have low-light vision.

This allows for the possibility that a creature could be sufficiently related to elves to have the elf subtype but is not, strictly, an elf. You could thus read the rules to infer that the elf subtype is not enough to qualify the creature for character options that have a prerequisite of being an elf.

We can also look to examples like the Half-Elf:

Type: Half-elves are humanoid creatures with both the human and the elf subtypes.

...

Elf Blood: Half-elves count as both elves and humans for any effect related to race.

In this case the character may have the elf subtype, but it also has the explicit racial trait Elf Blood which means it is able to qualify for elf-only character options. It may be that it is considered to have the elf and human subtypes only because of this racial trait. Either way, it's an explicit feature which means the half-elf qualifies for things as if an elf, and it's separate from the creature simply possessing the subtype "elf". Rules-as-written, it looks like it's a trait like Elf Blood which qualifies a creature that is not-an-elf for elf-only options, and the subtype is incidental.

On the other hand, we're hardly talking about a core mechanical issue here. The question of whether or not someone counts as an elf does not come up very frequently, and ruling favourably for a character that wants to take an elf-only option is not unreasonable. Personally, I would adjudicate that anything with the elf subtype is elf enough to take elf-only options.

This seems like it's almost certainly an oversight for the Houri

In the third-party race you mention, as they are literally half-elf (and half-nymph), it would seem wildly unfair to not permit them to qualify for elf-only options as normal half-elves do. I would personally guess that the omission of a racial trait along the lines of Elf Blood which clarified the creature counts as an Elf and a Fey/Feyblood was accidental, possibly in the belief that having the subtypes was all that was necessary. Either way, I'd definitely rule that Houri are elf enough to take elf options.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.