0
\$\begingroup\$

This question already has an answer here:

Picture this: I'm playing a kobold, who have the Sunlight Sensitivity trait (Volo's, p. 119)

You have disadvantage on attack rolls and Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight when you, the target of your attack, or whatever you are trying to perceive is in direct sunlight.

Now, I assume from that wording that a normal "bright light" isn't enough - has to be direct sunlight. Except then we get something like sunbeam, which not only creates a giant mah lazor, it also creates actual sunlight. (PHB, p. 229)

For the duration, a mote of brilliant radiance shines in your hand. It sheds bright light in a 30-foot radius and dim light for an additional 30 feet. The light is sunlight.

So far so good, it sounds like standing next to (or being, come to think about it) the caster while he's doing his thing is a bad thing for my eyes.

Except now we come to the Oath of Devotion paladin's level 20 feature, Holy Nimbus (PHB, p. 86):

At 20th level, as an action, you can emanate an aura of sunlight. For 1 minute, bright light shines from you in a 30-foot radius, and dim light shines 30 feet beyond that.

Here, the light is also called sunlight, but it's in the portion of the rules generally reserved for the "fluff" of the rules - is it actally sunlight? Would it hurt my eyes? Is bear-hugging vampires a Devotion Oath paladin sport now?

\$\endgroup\$

marked as duplicate by Rubiksmoose dnd-5e Jul 13 '18 at 1:55

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

7
\$\begingroup\$

It is actually sunlight. It says it's sunlight, it's sunlight.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry for disturbing your perfect 5000 score. :( Though it didn't seem to. Rep-capped for the day, perhaps? \$\endgroup\$ – T.J.L. Jul 12 '18 at 22:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ha ha, that's interesting, I didn't know there was a daily cap. \$\endgroup\$ – Jack Jul 12 '18 at 22:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ I recommend adding to this that they're is actually no "fluff" or flavor text to 5e spells as OP seems to think. \$\endgroup\$ – Rubiksmoose Jul 13 '18 at 1:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Rubiksmoose, is that necessarily true? \$\endgroup\$ – Jack Jul 13 '18 at 10:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Jack it is actually! According to JC. \$\endgroup\$ – Rubiksmoose Jul 13 '18 at 13:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.