Volo's Guide to Monsters p. 119 lists Bugbears as a playable race, with the Surprise Attack trait:

If you surprise a creature and hit it with an attack on your first turn in combat, the attack deals an extra 2d6 damage to it. You can use this trait only once per combat.

Aren't both emphasized clauses redundant? Is it possible to have multiple "first turns in combat" on a single combat, such that the final clause would be necessary?


It is not possible to have multiple "first turns in combat" in a single combat, but you could certainly hit with an attack multiple times during your first turn with the Extra Attack feature or similar. The "once per combat" clause ensures that the extra damage is only applied to the first successful attack.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ You beat me to it. \$\endgroup\$ – screamline Jul 24 '18 at 14:34
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ As a suggestion, you could mention how other wordings would also fail; "your first attack" weakens the ability slightly, for example. It could say "once per turn" instead of "once per combat" and have the same meaning, but a "once per combat" ability usable "once per turn" seems even stranger. ;) \$\endgroup\$ – Yakk Jul 24 '18 at 15:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ This answer is mostly correct, but note that the character can choose whether to use this ability on a hit, so could (for some reason) save the feature for their second hit on their first turn. For instance, maybe they are moving between attacks and want to use their first attack on a minion and then try to unload their extra damage on a second target. \$\endgroup\$ – Nick Brown Jul 24 '18 at 23:27
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @NickBrown are you sure? The wording given in the question seems to imply that triggering this ability is not optional: "The attack deals..." \$\endgroup\$ – EightAndAHalfTails Jul 25 '18 at 9:29
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Yakk True, but that starts to drift away from the point of this question. Besides, I can't explain why the writers didn't use some other wording such as "Your first successful attack against a surprised creature on your first turn in combat deals an extra 2d6 damage to it," which in my opinion is clearer. \$\endgroup\$ – EightAndAHalfTails Jul 25 '18 at 10:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.