I am looking at the warforged AC calculation from the Integrated Protection feature, looking only at Darkwood Core (unarmored), for a possible warforged barbarian. (I am using the version of the warforged race from the Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron.)

Darkwood Core says:
11 + your Dexterity modifier (add proficiency bonus if proficient with light armor)

What I want: Darkwood Core + Con
What I'm expecting: 11 + Dex + Con

Would this option be able to coincide with the Unarmored Defense for the Barbarian, or is this a case of conflicting Armor Classes?


Different AC calculations don't stack; you pick which one to use

As Slagmoth pointed out, this general topic has been asked and answered many times by the designers, and an official answer appears in the Sage Advice Compendium:

These [AC calculation] methods—along with any others that give you a formula for calculating your AC—are mutually exclusive; you can benefit from only one at a time. If you have access to more than one, you pick which one to use. For example, if you’re a sorcerer/monk, you can use either Unarmored Defense or Draconic Resilience, not both. Similarly, a druid/barbarian who transforms into a beast form that has natural armor can use either the beast’s natural armor or Unarmored Defense (you aren’t considered to be wearing armor with natural armor).

(The entry goes on to clarify that AC bonuses, like those provided by shields, do stack with AC calculations; it's simply that if your features give you different ways to calculate your AC, you pick one.)

In addition, Keith Baker - original Eberron designer, and primary author of the Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron - has posted an FAQ on his website about the Wayfinder's Guide (which he has continued to update to answer questions). It contains a section about the Integrated Protection feature, which specifically answers this question and references the Sage Advice ruling:

If I’m playing a warforged barbarian, do I get to add my Constitution to my Integrated Protection? What about a warforged monk?

No and no. Integrated Protection and Unarmored Defense are two separate features that set your AC, and the Sage Advice ruling on this is that you pick one—you don’t combine them. If you have your Integrated Protection mode set to darkwood core, you are considered to be unarmored and can thus use Unarmored Defense—but you’re always either using one or the other to determine your AC.

The section also clarifies whether the Integrated Protection feature counts as "armor"/"being armored" for other features. It's a worthwhile read.

In short: you have the choice between two different AC calculations:


They don't stack. You simply have the choice between one and the other (presumably you'd choose the one that gives you a higher overall AC).


Armor Class calculations do not stack

Page 2 of the Sage Advice Compendium clarifies how to calculate armor classes when you have multiple options:

  • Unarmored: 10 + your Dexterity modifier.

  • Armored: Use the AC entry for the armor you’re wearing (see PH, 145). For example, in leather armor, you calculate your AC as 11 + your Dexterity modifier, and in chain mail, your AC is simply 16.

  • Unarmored Defense (Barbarian): 10 + your Dexterity modifier + your Constitution modifier.

  • Unarmored Defense (Monk): 10 + your Dexterity modifier + your Wisdom modifier.

  • Draconic Resilience (Sorcerer): 13 + your Dexterity modifier.

  • Natural Armor: 10 + your Dexterity modifier + your natural armor bonus. This is a calculation method typically used only by monsters and NPCs, although it is also relevant to a druid or another character who assumes a form that has natural armor.

The fun part is that the Warforged entry does not indicate whether their feature counts as Armored or as Natural Armor. I would suspect (and as a DM say it was intended to be the latter allowing barbarian and monk features) without developer guidance it would be up to your DM though. If they for some reason rule the former though that means that Warforged are ill-suited to be monks or barbarians. It would be unlike them to shaft a race like that.

As @V2Blast points out Keith Baker the original author of Eberron goes into some intent on this page. However, once WotC declared him the winner of the world-building contest he no longer owns it and technically is not official ruling on the matter.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. \$\endgroup\$ – mxyzplk Aug 25 '18 at 23:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.