Can you take the Attack action and use darts as improvised "light melee weapons" to trigger Two-Weapon Fighting for the purpose of making two thrown attacks?

My financially challenged first level wizard chooses the attack action. He declares the darts to be improvised daggers so they are "treated as such".

This declaration requires a ruling that a dart "is akin" to a dagger. This declaration; using the "as if it were that weapon" clause; changes them to "simple melee weapons" with 1d4 piercing damage, adds the "finesse", "light" and "thrown" properties, and gives a range of 20/60.

Improvised Weapons PHB p.147. "In many cases, an improvised weapon is similar to an actual weapon and can be treated as such. For example, a table leg is akin to a club. At the DM’s option, a character proficient with a weapon can use a similar object as if it were that weapon and use his or her proficiency bonus."

He holds them in each hand, this triggers a bonus action per Two-Weapon fighting. The thrown property permits me to thrown them in place of a melee attack. Negating the need for a melee attack.

Two-Weapon Fighting PHB p. 195 "When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you’re holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack with a different light melee weapon that you’re holding in the other hand. You don’t add your ability modifier to the damage of the bonus attack, unless that modifier is negative.

If either weapon has the thrown property, you can throw the weapon, instead of making a melee attack with it.

This resolves the thematic head scratching of why I can uses daggers to make two attacks, but not darts due to its placement on a weapon table. It also saves a poor 1st level wizard a few coins.

Is this interpretation correct RAW?

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ In that case, this would be a dupe of Can You Two-Weapon Fight With a Dart? \$\endgroup\$ – Purple Monkey Sep 23 '18 at 13:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Related questions are here. 1 and 2 ...@PurpleMonkey Not sure if it's a dupe (I need to look at both more closely) but it sure is similar. \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Sep 23 '18 at 13:28

No. Improvised melee weapons aren't melee weapons.

As per this ruling by Jeremy Crawford:

If a game feature says it works with a melee weapon, it means an actual melee weapon.

Another ruling clarifies that using a ranged weapon as an improvised melee weapon does not make it a melee weapon:

The act of throwing a melee weapon doesn't transform it into a ranged weapon. Melee and ranged are categories of weapons in the rules. Similarly, whacking someone with a longbow doesn't transform it into a melee weapon.

As the question notes, the Two-Weapon Fighting rules only trigger with melee weapons:

When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon that you’re holding in one hand [...]

Therefore, you can't use two improvised melee weapons to trigger Two-Weapon Fighting. Your DM, of course, is free to rule otherwise if it makes sense.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.