Looking at other questions about casting spells as a bonus action has left me trying to keep a lot of information in my head about whether a given combination of spells is legal according to the official 5th edition spellcasting rules.

So I'd like to consolidate all these rules into a single easily accessible table, containing all the possible combinations of spells that could possibly be cast in a single turn, and hopefully create an easy reference for future use. But I'm not certain about how some of these combinations should be treated.

Based on the second question I linked, the ordering doesn't matter, so I've simplified the chart to ignore order of these actions, and only focus on what actions are being taken. But if I'm mistaken (i.e. the answer provided to that question was wrong) then this table will need adjusting.

\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline Action & Bonus\ Action & Action\ Surge & LEGAL? \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & & & Yes \\ \hline Cantrip & & & Yes \\ \hline & Non-Cantrip & & Yes \\ \hline & Cantrip & & Yes \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Cantrip & & No \\ \hline Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & & Yes \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & & No \\ \hline Cantrip & Cantrip & & Yes \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & & Cantrip & Yes \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & & Non-Cantrip & ?Yes? \\ \hline Cantrip & & Non-Cantrip & ?Yes? \\ \hline Cantrip & & Cantrip & Yes \\ \hline Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & Cantrip & ?Yes? \\ \hline Non-Cantrip & Cantrip & Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Cantrip & Cantrip & Non-Cantrip & ?No? \\ \hline Cantrip & Cantrip & Cantrip & Yes \\ \hline \end{array}

Is this table (Column 4 in particular) correct?

The core issue for me is that it's not clear to me how Action Surges interact with the spellcasting rules, hence the question marks listed there. It seems like an Action Surge might permit 2 leveled spells to be cast in a turn, unless a Bonus Action is used to cast a spell, in which case this is no longer permitted. If this is correct, then my table above should be correct, minus the question marks. But I need that validated.

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ The table would be more helpful as an answer \$\endgroup\$ – András Oct 16 '18 at 17:36

The table is entirely correct

Action Surge does not interact in any way with the bonus action spell rule (other than being limited in the same way as other spells if you use a bonus action spell). The bonus action rule is only used for spells with a bonus action casting time.

You can’t cast another spell during the same turn [that you would cast a bonus action spell], except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action.

This is also further explained in one of the answers in the official rules clarification document Sage Advice Compendium which says:

If you cast a spell...with a bonus action, you can cast another spell with your action, but that other spell must be a cantrip. Keep in mind that this particular limit is specific to spells that use a bonus action. For instance, if you cast a second spell using Action Surge, you aren’t limited to casting a cantrip with it.

Basically, if you cast (or will cast) a bonus action spell (cantrip or non-cantrip) in a turn, no other non-cantrip spells (even ones using the action from action surge) can be cast.

  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ The last sentence captures the rule perfectly. No need for a big table or long discussions. It's a simple rule to follow. \$\endgroup\$ – GreySage Oct 16 '18 at 16:55
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @rpeinhardt Those situations are accurate. If you cast a bonus action cantrip, you cannot cast a non-cantrip with your action. No matter what type of bonus action spell is cast, all other spells in that turn must be cantrips. \$\endgroup\$ – David Coffron Oct 16 '18 at 17:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ That's one of the weirder rules. You can cast two action non-cantrips with action surge but not a bonus action and an action non-cantrip as far as I understand \$\endgroup\$ – OganM Oct 16 '18 at 21:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ @OganM your understanding is correct, but whether it's weird is debatable. The intent is to give bonus action spells a measurable cost so they aren't even more effective than other spells \$\endgroup\$ – David Coffron Oct 16 '18 at 21:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DavidCoffron this is getting terribly close to being a discussion. But I'd argue it IS weird (or at least needlessly restrictive). Bonus spells are still a measurable cost compared to action-spells, you have to burn a 1xDay feature to use another spell. We can agree to disagree on this, I'm not going to agree about the RAW . \$\endgroup\$ – 3C273 Oct 17 '18 at 1:39

Your table is correct, but can be dramatically simplified to this one, which I threw together in sheets, sorry for relative simplicity: enter image description here and a text-friendlier version: \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline Max Action/Surge Spell Level & Bonus Action Spell & Legal? \\ \hline Any & None & TRUE \\ \hline None & Any & TRUE \\ \hline Cantrip & Any & TRUE \\ \hline Level 1+ & Any & FALSE \\ \hline \end{array}

As above, this is based upon:

Basically, if you cast (or will cast) a bonus action spell (cantrip or non-cantrip) in a turn, no other non-cantrip spells (even ones using the action from action surge) can be cast.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.