# Monster Skill Ranks don’t match RAW?

I've had this problem for awhile now. When deconstructing monsters from the various Monster Manuals (to modify or add templates etc) their skill ranks do not add up properly.

Am I missing something, doing something wrong or is this simply an example where the Primary Source rule is changing the monsters without stating it's doing so?

As an example, let's take the loyal dog Monster Manual pg 271.

His stat block shows:

Abilities:

Str 13, Dex 17, Con 15, Int 2, Wis 12, Cha 6

Skills:

Jump +7, Listen +5, Spot +5, Survival +1*

Dogs Have +4 Racial Bonus to Jump
* Dogs have +4 Racial Bonus to Survival when tracking by scent.

Animals get (2 +int modifier skill points per level, minimum 1) (×4 for 1st HD). Due to the animal's negative Int modifier, he gets 1×4=4 skill points for 1st HD.

It's easier to word this question by building the skill stats from the ground up rather than deconstructing so I'll do that here just to make it read easier:

Spot: +1 Wis, +2 Alertness =+3 (before spending ranks)

Listen: +1 Wis, +2 Alertness =+3 (before spending ranks)

Survival: +1 Wis=+1 (before spending ranks)

Jump: +1Str, +4 Racial Bonus AND +4 speed (untyped) bonus since he has a 40' movement. (See link for explanation if your unfamiliar)=+9 (before spending ranks)

So, taking all the info above, it appears that the dog spent 2 points in spot & his last 2 in listen and a negative rank in jump!?

The only other explanation I can see is that they ignored the speed bonus to jump while giving him an extra 3 skill points to spend.

So, back to my question:

Am I missing something, doing something wrong or is this simply an example where the Primary Source rule is changing the monsters without stating it's doing so?

You are correct that a great many creatures' skill points are inaccurately spent (cf. this question). Other errors, too, exist in creatures' stat blocks (cf. this question). Errors like these can remain uncorrected even by errata and reprints like the premium edition Monster Manual (2012)) that include stealth errata: its dog entry has the dog's Jump skill bonus also as +7.

If you tinker long enough, you'll likely find some error or important omission in—at a guess—about every third monster. (That's what it feels like to me, anyway, and I tinker with a lot of monsters.) And, of course, the more complex the monster, the more likely it is that there's an error somewhere. You've to adjust things and move on. Then, if you're feeling generous, share the error with your players and have a laugh. You may even get lucky and the topic will arise naturally in another venue—like on a Q & A site, for instance—allowing you to share your findings more widely

If this minutiae really interests you, Cooper's Compendium of Corrected Creatures (with which I am not affiliated but which I endorse) goes through the entire SRD and attempts to fix many of the more egregious errors therein, and Corrected Creatures does, indeed, change the dog's Jump skill bonus to +9.

• THIS! It's not about the "Dog" it's about that it feels like Every.Other.Entry. is wrong! I've been thinking I was just dumb and missing something because there is no way that there are that many wrong entries..or, rather I guess there are...thanks for the links! – Ben-Jamin Oct 30 '18 at 3:13
• and ofcourse, since they never bothered to fix them in the erratas they released...why publish an errata if you're not going to fix the wrong entries? – Ben-Jamin Oct 30 '18 at 3:27
• As I understand it, 3.0 has a different method of calculating animal skill ranks; and the results were mostly just copy-pasted into the 3.5 Monster Manual. – Narf the Mouse Nov 12 '18 at 1:30
• @NarftheMouse Honestly, I checked that before posting the answer. Had the 3.5 dog's skill modifiers (Jump +8, Listen +5, Spot +5, Swim +3, Survival +1) been identical enough to the 3e dog's skill modifiers (Listen +5, Spot +5, Swim +5, Wilderness Lore +1), I would've mentioned it, but they aren't. Although you're right that the number of skill points are different (4 in 3.5e and a mysterious 10-15 in 3e), somebody went through, recomputed the dog's skill points and skill modifiers, and—so far as I can tell—just got it wrong. – Hey I Can Chan Nov 12 '18 at 2:35
• @NarftheMouse You're welcome, and it's hardly a mistake. All you did was make me double-check; that's not a big deal and often for the best. :-) – Hey I Can Chan Nov 12 '18 at 2:52

Creature statblocks had errors (or, if being generous, unmentioned specific-trumps-general exceptions) all the time in 3.5e. They are not generally worth trying to back-calculate.

I cannot see anything wrong, at a glance, with your reasoning. It certainly seems like the dog’s Jump check is off.