I wasn't able to find anything about this in 5th Edition. A drake seems that it would exceed the 1/4 challenge rating stated in the PHB.

In this specific campaign, our Dungeon Master allows anything that is accessible on D&D Beyond not including Homebrew content.

I did find the Drake Warden Ranger archetype, which I assume is for Pathfinder, and thought it might be possible that I’d overlooked a similar variant in D&D 5E.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If you plan was to have a Drake called 'Doctor' and that has been ruined, can I suggest instead a Dog called 'Snoop'? \$\endgroup\$ – RyanfaeScotland Nov 1 '18 at 12:43

No, Drakes aren't Beasts

Drakes, though animal like in appearance and behavior, have the creature type of dragon, not beast. And the Ranger's Companion states:

Choose a beast that is no larger than Medium and that has a challenge rating of 1/4 or lower (PHB, p. 93 bold added).

"Beast" is not just a descriptive word here, it is a creature type (see Monster Manual page 6) that applies to some creatures and not others. If a creature is a beast, it will say so in its stat block (right under its name, right after its size).

There are some interesting examples of intimidating (read: awesome) creatures that are 1/4 CR beasts: a pteranodon springs to mind. But drakes are not beasts, so they would not be eligible as a Beast Master Ranger's Companion (even if a CR 1/4 one existed in some published adventure).


The lowest-CR drake on D&DBeyond has CR = ½

A ranger's companion must have CR ≤ ¼.

So no, you cannot (currently) have a drake as your animal companion. To do so would require either a modification to the ranger rules or a new drake with CR ≤ ¼ (and the beast type, as gandalfmeansme rightly points out) to be published by WotC.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.