5
\$\begingroup\$

A typical adventurer in a breastplate and employing a heavy wooden shield suffers a −6 armor check penalty on appropriate skills, including the Move Silently skill.

But, with that in mind, what's the Listen skill check DC to hear that same adventurer if that adventurer's standing still? And what's the Listen skill check DC to hear that same otherwise-standing-still adventurer retrieve an item from his backpack?

Rather than opinion, I really want the rules-as-written on this if the rules cover this, no matter how absurd those rules might be. If this isn't covered anywhere by the rules, I'd like to know that, too.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. \$\endgroup\$
    – mxyzplk
    Nov 21, 2018 at 20:46

2 Answers 2

5
\$\begingroup\$

The special ability invisibility offers some guidance…

It's unfortunate that in the Player's Handbook neither the skill Listen nor the skill Move Silently addresses what happens when a creature is standing still or performing an action that involves moving but that doesn't involve traveling from square to square using its speed. However, the Dungeon Master's Guide on Invisibility does indirectly address this possibility:

A creature can use hearing to find an invisible creature. A character can make a Listen check for this purpose as a free action each round. A Listen check result at least equal to the invisible creature’s Move Silently check result reveals its presence. (A creature with no ranks in Move Silently makes a Move Silently check as a Dexterity check to which an armor check penalty applies.) A successful check lets a character hear an invisible creature "over there somewhere." It’s practically impossible to pinpoint the location of an invisible creature. A Listen check that beats the DC by 20 pinpoints the invisible creature’s location. (295)

(Emphases mine.) By extension, then, a Listen skill check result that at least equals a visible creature's Move Silently skill check result should likewise reveal a visible creature's presence! (The Listen skill check DC should, of course, be adjusted for distance and barriers and so on as normal, obviously.)

That is, in the typical campaign, a creature can only take free actions (except speaking) on its turn. This means that, off-turn, when the standing-still creature's not doing anything, that standing-still creature nonetheless makes a Move Silently skill check if the foe attempts to discern the standing-still creature's presence. (This, by the way, utterly ignores the idea of combat simultaneity and what actions the standing-still creature took on its turn!)

Then, if the foe's Listen skill check equals or exceeds the creature's Move Silently skill check, the foe determines that the standing-still creature's over there somewhere. And if the foe's Listen skill check equals or exceeds the creature's Move Silently skill check by at least 20, the foe pinpoints that the standing-still creature's location.

But that's just for using the Listen skill in isolation. It's usually pretty easy—automatic even!—to locate a standing-still creature visually if the standing-still creature's not hiding or doesn't possess total cover or total concealment. (Also see this question.)

…But it doesn't cover every situation…

What the Dungeon Master's Guide on Invisibility fails to address is what happens if the foe does not or even cannot take that free action to make a Listen skill check (e.g. the creature possesses the condition nauseated (PH 310)). In that case, I refer the reader to Anaruoch: The Empire of Shade that, for context, early on includes a read-aloud description that's excerpted below:

[O]n the walls [of this room] hang wooden plaques supporting the dusty heads of various long-dead creatures—stags, boars, wolves, and other trophies. (9)

Then the DM is provided with the following rules:

Four of the creatures mounted in this gallery are still alive. [The antagonist's] four werewolf companions have thrust their heads through holes cut through the wall and the plaques, and they are posing as trophies until she gives the signal for them to attack. [N.b. What could possibly go wrong?] A successful DC 20 Listen check detects the sound of their breathing. Only if the PCs create adequate light to see with can they determine that the wolf heads are less dusty than the rest. (ibid.)

Keep in mind that Anaruoch offers no rules for changing this Listen skill check DC for distance despite the room's dimensions of 40 ft. by 30 ft., and there are no rules for how often the PCs get to make this Listen skill check! That makes these rules into guidelines, but they may serve as a starting point for the DM that needs to codify such rules for the campaign.

…Like retrieving an item from a backpack

With all this out there—and because there's no bonus on Move Silently skill checks for standing still—, retrieving an item from a backpack should probably be louder than just standing still. This DM would have a creature that takes a move action to retrieve silently an item from a backpack make a Move Silently skill check with the typical −2 penalty as per the DM's Best Friend (DMG 30). Further, much like moving at half speed incurs no penalty on Move Silently skill checks, this DM would allow a creature to take a full-round action (i.e. essentially two move actions or twice as long) to retrieve silently an item from its backpack yet suffer no penalty on its Move Silently skill check.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have two questions: FIRST: So based on this we are assuming that a creature, whether standing still or moving, requires to make Move Silently checks. Did I understand this correctly ? SECOND: Would the creature standing still benefit from a circumstance bonus on his Move Silently check over the creature that is moving around in the room ? \$\endgroup\$ Nov 22, 2018 at 4:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KilrathiSly Sort of. A creature that's standing still and doing nothing during its own turn makes no Move Silently skill checks. That standing-still creature's foe on the foe's turn can take a free action to make a Listen skill check that's opposed by the standing-still creature's Move Silently skill check. The DM may have foes make—at intervals the DM picks—Listen skill checks to hear a standing still creature's incidental noise (like breathing) (DC 20 or so?). With these as guidelines, the DM may call for Listen checks vs. a Move Silently check when a creature quietly retrieves an item. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 22, 2018 at 7:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KilrathiSly I know that's complicated—and, honestly, maybe even a little silly—, but I'm really trying to present the RAW here as requested. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 22, 2018 at 7:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ My conclusions were similar, I wanted to have second opinions because the situation arose of a group wanting to protect an NPC during a fight. Thus putting the NPC invisible and asking him not to move an inch while they fought the assassins out to take the NPC out. I wanted to know the chances of the assassins still pinpointing their standing still, invisible target, and maybe take him out anyways. Thanks \$\endgroup\$ Nov 22, 2018 at 19:14
1
\$\begingroup\$

Move silently might cover this

As far as I know/could find there are no rule explicitly covering being silent while standing still. Nor is drawing objects from backpacks explicitly covered.

The Move Silently skill states its use:

Action

None. A Move Silently check is included in your movement or other activity, so it is part of another action

Grabbing something from a bag might be considered to be another activity but standing still would probably not qualify.

So if you want to count standing still and grabbing something from your bag as activities you would use the normal Move Silently rules. This would mean that Armor check penalty applies but your DM should probably give you an bonus for not moving.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .