8
\$\begingroup\$

As the old adage goes, "water and electricity don't mix" because in real life water contains impurities that make it super conductible. So what would happen if, for instance, a sorceress were to cast shocking grasp on a creature underwater?

Would the spell not work? Would it affect the caster as well? Would it spread and hit everything under water?

Shocking grasp in particular specifies that "You have advantage if the target is wearing metal armor" which indicates that the designers are taking conductivity into account.

What about call lightning or chain lightning? Would casting a higher level spell change the outcome?

\$\endgroup\$
4

1 Answer 1

23
\$\begingroup\$

Lightning damaging spells do not behave differently in water

The various lightning spells you mention, shocking grasp, call lightning and chain lightning, none of them mention interacting with water in any way, so they don't. Spells only do what they say they do, although a DM is free to rule otherwise (also see the end of the quote at end of my answer). The section in the PHB about underwater combat (pg. 198) also doesn't mention anything about lightning spells behaving differently in water.

Regarding upcasting spells, any spell that has addition or different effects when upcast has a section that starts with At Higher Levels, and no spell mentions how lightning damage is enhanced by water when upcast.

Although this quote from JC is about fire spells underwater, I think the same reasoning applies to lightning (from Does Fireball evaporate water?, borrowed from this answer):

Nothing in the rules causes a fireball to vaporize water. Magic ≠ physics. DMs may apply whatever magical/scientific logic they like. — Jeremy E. Crawford

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Pretty good explanation (Also hey, that's my answer!), +1 \$\endgroup\$
    – Jihelu
    Nov 24, 2018 at 18:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .