7
\$\begingroup\$

Buckler:

Benefit: [...] You can also use your shield arm to wield a weapon (whether you are using an offhand weapon or using your off hand to help wield a two-handed weapon), but you take a –1 penalty on attack rolls while doing so. This penalty stacks with those that may apply for fighting with your off hand and for fighting with two weapons. [...]

Is there a way to avoid this -1 penalty? I've searched along the web and found nothing, but maybe I'm missing something. Could be a feat, or a magic item maybe?

\$\endgroup\$
10
\$\begingroup\$

There are a few ways, but bear in mind that it's much easier to increase your attack bonus than simply remove the penalty, with greater benefits in the long run (such as unlocking other feats):

  • Thunderstrike (fighter archetype): Removes the buckler penalty when using a weapon using both hands;
  • Buckler Duelist (fighter archetype): Increases the attack and damage while wielding a falcata and a buckler at the same time;
  • Duelist (combat feat): This applies only when using the (optional) Stamina system, but you remove the buckler penalties when wielding a falcata and a buckler at the same time;
  • Shielded Staff Style combined with Shielded Staff Mastery: You attach your shield (including bucklers) to your staff and may attack with it normally without any attack penalty from the shield;

There is a third party (Kobold Press) feat that does exactly what you are looking for:

  • Buckler Mastery: When wielding a weapon in the same hand as your buckler, you may pick to gain +1 AC or remove that -1 penalty to attack rolls.
| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

How about Mithral buckler. i think that would be a solution

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This is a useful answer, thank you Martin. However I would suggest improving it by a link to the relevant rules for Mithral. \$\endgroup\$ – Isaac Dec 31 '19 at 11:19
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Or an even better answer - would also quote the relevant rule here, much like how ShadowKras has written his answer (Though I personally find your suggestion the more useful of the two). \$\endgroup\$ – Isaac Dec 31 '19 at 11:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming! \$\endgroup\$ – Someone_Evil Dec 31 '19 at 13:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Unless this is a specific magic item, bucklers made using mithral special material will not lose that -1 penalty to attack rolls, as mithral only affects armor check penalty, spell failure chance, max dexterity and the proficiency to wear the item by one category (for armors). \$\endgroup\$ – ShadowKras Jan 6 at 15:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Mithral reduces the penalty for attacking with the buckler's hand? because its not check penalty, the buckler has that "-1 to attack rolls" in the item description section \$\endgroup\$ – Martin Chocho Jan 10 at 20:42
0
\$\begingroup\$

If you use a masterwork bucker, it reduces the armor check penalty by 1. The cost is 150gp in addition to the cost of the buckler (2gp).

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ This answer would be improved by including the connection between the armor check penalty and the attack penalty (if any). Currently, it doesn't address the question, i.e. how to avoid a penalty on attacks with a buckler. \$\endgroup\$ – ValhallaGH Sep 26 at 2:53
-5
\$\begingroup\$

No. That's like asking "Is there a way to cheat?" Many items come with a "cost" to offset the benefit of having that item's properties. If you don't like the cost, drop the item. The cost is baked-into the item to balance the item's benefit. If you're going to ignore the baked-in cost, then why not just say that you can march around with three tower shields (one on each arm plus one strapped to your back) while wielding a two-handed greatsword...in each hand? You see where ignoring baked-in costs can get you, and why they are baked-in, now?

Instead of trying to ditch the cost, look for a way to compensate, such as gaining the -1 back in some other real-world way. What I mean by this is best explained by telling you that I am a RL heavy-weapons fighter, and I HAVE trained to use a spiked buckler while wielding a two-handed spear. The way you get past the -1 from having a hunk of wood strapped to your left arm is to TRAIN enough that your left arm gets stronger...and your spear skills also get sharper. Thus compensated, I went into (SCA Heavy) battle a better fighter with more tools. There will be an in-game version of this, even if it means leveling to effectively get the -1 back.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. \$\endgroup\$ – V2Blast Feb 23 '19 at 21:48
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Two things that could be improved on this answer: 1) Looking for a way to mitigate a problem is not "cheating", especially if the game has those tools available and the OP simply doesn't know about them. 2) "Training", in the game, is represented by levels, skill ranks and feats. You could elaborate on that and how you acquired the feat to fight with a buckler on your arm while wielding a two-handed spear. \$\endgroup\$ – ShadowKras Feb 25 '19 at 11:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.