The rules packet does not provide any specific rules about flanking. However the rule does say that the DM has lots of leeway in deciding when to give advantage or disadvantage in combat. Should it be understood that flanking always gives advantage, or is the DM supposed to only give advantage when there is "clever flanking"? What is the best way to handle "flanking" in D&D 5e?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @V2Blast Fyi, for a period after the D&D Next playtest the policy was to grandfather playtest questions into D&D 5e proper. That policy didn't work that well and created problems and confusion so we discontinued it, but those questions which were successfully grandfathered in and answered for the released 5e are probably best left as such. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 16, 2018 at 8:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @doppelspooker Ah, okay. Thanks for clarifying. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Commented Oct 16, 2018 at 17:26

6 Answers 6


There is no flanking rule as a default; there are, however, a couple of optional rules proposed in the DM's handbook. It should also be noted that these are part of a general set of rules dedicated to playing using miniatures and tactical maps and even then they are marked as optional.

The flanking rule states:

Flanking on Squares. When a creature and at least one of its allies are adjacent to an enemy and on opposite sides or corners of the enemy's space, they flank that enemy, and each of them has advantage on melee attack rolls against that enemy.

When in doubt about whether two creatures flank an enemy on a grid, trace an imaginary line between the centers of the creatures' spaces. If the line passes through opposite sides or corners of the enemy's space, the enemy is flanked.

Flanking on Hexes. When a creature and at least one of its allies are adjacent to an enemy and on opposite sides of the enemy's space, they flank that enemy, and each of them has advantage on attack rolls against that enemy. On hexes, count around the enemy from one creature to its ally. Against a Medium or smaller creature, the allies flank if there are 2 hexes between them. Against a Large creature, the allies flank if there are 4 hexes between them. Against a Huge creature, they must have 5 hexes between them. Against a Gargantuan creature, they must have at least 6 hexes between them.

DM's Handbook p.251

An alternative optional rule offered by the DM's guide is called facing.

If you want the precision of knowing which way a creature is facing, consider using this optional rule.

Whenever a creature ends its move, it can change its facing. Each creature has a front arc (the direction it faces), left and right side arcs, and a rear arc. A creature can also change its facing as a reaction when any other creature moves.

DM's Handbook p.252

This rule suggests the following effects:

  • An attacker in a creature's rear arc has advantage
  • Shield bonuses only apply AC to the front arc and side arc of the shield arm.
  • Some creatures will not have limited arcs, like an amorphous blob

This is arguably more complex to adjudicate and manage than flanking is.

A potential issue one could take with flanking in 5e is related to the change in Attack of Opportunity rules. Previously, circling a creature tightly, even with a 5ft reach would provoke an AoO, as you were moving through threatened squares. In order to flank and avoid an AoO you would typically need to go wide or use an ability. In 5e an opportunity attack is only provoked when you move out of a creature's reach without disengaging. In my opinion this makes it effectively trivial to flank.

As a further counter argument, keep in mind that DND 5e adds the "help" action, which can easily be used as an analogous — yet more general and less powerful — mechanic.

Alternatively, you can aid a friendly creature in attacking a creature within 5 feet of you. You feint, distract the target, or in some other way team up to make your ally’s attack more effective. If your ally attacks the target before your next turn, the first attack roll is made with advantage.

Player's Handbook p.192

In order to create an advantage, one attacker must focus on helping via a distraction or combat engagement at the cost of not being able to effectively score a hit. However, this still gives the other attacker a far better chance at scoring a hit. This makes this more useful against powerful opponents while being unimportant against lesser ones. I feel this makes this a much more tactical choice than mere positioning, while still providing a simple and generic mechanic that feels balanced and is unlikely to be overused.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Another drawback is that it undermines the "specialness" of the rogue's sneak attack trigger, albeit in a minor way. When adding optional rules, it's often worth considering whether it overlaps with, and therefore reduces the value of, a class/racial/feat perk that already exists. \$\endgroup\$
    – detly
    Commented Aug 3, 2015 at 2:22
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Agreed. Advantage is a key combat mechanic and the trivialness of getting into flanking position would seem to break other advantage mechanics. I suppose some alternatives would be to have it provide +2 as before, or change the AoO rules back to movement through threatened squares. At this point though I'm happy with the base rules. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 3, 2015 at 16:41
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ We use miniatures in all our games and use the following: flanking grants +1 to hit(only to the flankers, a third player would be out of luck) also once entering the enemy reach you provoke an AoO if moving further. These rules have the following effects: small strategic adv to flanking, disengage is more valuable (and rouges in general), attacks with a reach get AoO. A further rule we have: If you start in space threatened by a creature you can move one square not provoking opportunity attacks by that (single) creature. Everyone got used to the rules quickly, and they have not been an issue. \$\endgroup\$
    – Quaternion
    Commented Mar 10, 2018 at 22:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't think flanking breaks other Advantage mechanics. I think it just highlights (quite realistically) its strategic importance. The help action can still be useful – e.g. a cornered opponent can't be flanked. Also, flanking is not a useful rule if you're using theatre of the mind, in which case; help. \$\endgroup\$
    – geoidesic
    Commented Jan 22, 2020 at 14:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also what makes a difference to the value of help is the attack ability of the helper vs. the helped. If the helper is a wizard (for example) with little chance to hit and low damage, she may rather help the fighter. \$\endgroup\$
    – geoidesic
    Commented Jan 22, 2020 at 14:22

Being a playtester DM I've spent some time to make a list of all the things that grant advantage and disadvantage within the current ruleset.

The following things grant advantage to an attack roll:

  • Attacking a creature who can't see you
  • Attacker being helped†
  • Paralyzed target
  • Prone target (adjacent attacks only)
  • Restrained target
  • Stunned target
  • Unconscious target

Unless you apply DM fiat, flanking does not give advantage.

† Flanking doesn't count as "helping" in D&D Next. Helping is a specific action. It used to exist in previous editions (3.x) and it gave +2 to the attack roll, provided the aiding character was adjacent to both the aided one and its target. The distinction here is that helping is an action and therefore it uses up your turn. Flanking in 3.x is a passive thing that requires no action itself, just good positioning, so both flanking characters get to attack (if they have any action left, that is) and both get the flanking bonus.

  • \$\begingroup\$ You can also aid a friendly creature in attacking a creature within 5 feet of you. In this scenario, you give away your attack and your friend gains advantage on his attack roll. (PHB. 192 - Help Action) \$\endgroup\$
    – felipecrp
    Commented Jan 10, 2015 at 3:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ You may want to change "Hidden attacker" to "Unseen attacker" as being "Hidden" makes you "Unseen" but it is not the only way to be unseen (eg, being invisible, being totally obscured, attacking a blind target, etc). Hidden is also way more nuanced than just being unseen so it may be misleading. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 3, 2019 at 11:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ @jgn was this already the case in D&D Next (the playtest for D&D 5e)? I have lost the hard disk that contained the files I downloaded during the beta and I can't check it anymore. \$\endgroup\$
    – Zachiel
    Commented Nov 9, 2019 at 11:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Zachiel I'm not sure. This question was grandfathered through to 5e though. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 3:21

There's an optional rule for Flanking in the 5th edition Dungeon Master's Guide.

The gist of it is that indeed, flanking does give advantage to each of the flankers.

For details, see the p.251 in the book.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Good new information but not a complete answer - the best answer to this question would also cover the base case and not just an optional rule. \$\endgroup\$
    – mxyzplk
    Commented Dec 29, 2014 at 17:22

In the current 5E playtest, there is no flanking. In fact, there are few rules for combat at all, and definitely no rules for grid-based combat and positioning. As stated elsewhere, the playtest doesn't represent the final ruleset, so positioning rules may be added later on, but for now, granting advantage is merely a judgement call.

Personally, I would say that it depends a lot on the situation. A normal humanoid creature being ganged up on by two assailants might be at a disadvantage, whereas as large creature, or exceptionally skilled opponent, might not have that same problem. Grant advantage on a case by case basis, and come up with a set of criteria that suit you and your gaming group.

  • \$\begingroup\$ There actually are rules for grid based combat and positioning. For example, a medium sized creature can only be surrounded by 8 other medium sized creature, and a gargantuan creature takes up "3 slots" etc. I believe it's in the DM section rather than the general rules though. Other than that small point, I think you have a good answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – GMNoob
    Commented May 28, 2012 at 10:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ Right, I had missed those. Still, the point stands. The "surrounding" rules are just a way to account for that sort of thing when not using a grid. That being said: I would definitely grant (dis)advantage if someone was mostly surrounded. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 28, 2012 at 15:13
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @GMNoob Surrounding rules date back to 2e and 1e and are unrelated to the WotC-era concept of "flanking". I would not grant disadvantage to someone surrounded unless an enemy's pack tactics needed to be represented via advantage. Being attacked 8 times a round is plenty deadly all itself. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 29, 2012 at 19:37

I've had some arguments with players over 5e's optional rule for flanking on squares so I thought I would upload this image which should make it very clear. D&D 5e optional rules on flanking explained

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thanks. I edited my post so it was more clear that the rule was optional. \$\endgroup\$
    – GadgetDM
    Commented Jun 10, 2018 at 4:59

I don't believe the intent is that flanking always grants advantage, but of course all the rules aren't out yet. It seems like it's hearkening back to 1e-2e where backstab required actual stealth or other sneakniess and the rogue wasn't a DPS machine. There's nothing to indicate you can get advantage simply by flanking (it would be way too powerful for random positioning to get you 2d20 take highest IMO). It says nothing anywhere about flanking conveying Advantage so assuming it does is quite unsupported by the rules.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .