This is kind of a fussy question, but I was reading through the stat blocks for some of the demon lords in D&D 5e today and came across a seeming edge case that I hadn't thought of before.

Orcus has a Multiattack feature, like many monsters, and this multiattack is restricted to a specific kind of attack (melee with the Wand of Orcus):

Multiattack. Orcus makes two Wand of Orcus attacks.

Usually the multiattack restrictions limit using particularly effective attacks or attacks which don't make as much sense as part of a single attack sequence (so it may restrict saving throws, or be a claw-bite combo, etc.).

But for Orcus it's not clear to me if he should have a multiattack option with any melee weapon in his hands, or just the Wand or Orcus. My thinking is that the Wand itself doesn't grant multiattack to anyone wielding it, Orcus' power isn't derived from the Wand, and Orcus is himself a fundamentally difficult adversary to deal with.

On the other hand, Orcus' stat block makes it clear that he usually has the Wand in his possession and in rare instances sends it elsewhere. It could be that the multiattack is a special feature only Orcus gets which, along with is other abilities, would make him loath to part with it. I'm also aware of the general rule that things in 5e do what they say rather than what they imply. It's also easily possible that campaign circumstances are meant to alter the challenge of a fight with Orcus.

At my own table I would probably rule that Orcus can make a multiattack with any melee weapon he holds (so his tail attack is never an option to include), and if unarmed could make two unarmed attacks. But I'm curious if there is an official ruling anywhere indicating the RAI of Orcus' multiattack, or if there are other considerations I've not thought of on this point which point to restricting this to the Wand:

Could Orcus make his multiattack with any melee weapon, or is it restricted only to the Wand of Orcus if he's wielding it?

  • \$\begingroup\$ It's definitely not a fussy question. \$\endgroup\$
    – SkyPaul
    Aug 25, 2019 at 21:18

2 Answers 2


The Multiattack is restricted to the Wand

Orcus can only use Multiattack with the Wand of Orcus - just like, for example, the Assassin can only Multiattack with a shortsword. Shortswords don’t grant Multiattack to anyone wielding them either.

As for why this is so:

  1. It’s written that way,
  2. Maybe Orcus has a special affinity for the Wand of Orcus, that it doesn’t have for the Longsword of not Orcus. And maybe assassins work exclusively with shortswords until they get really good.

Change it if you like - it’s unlikely to make a significant difference.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you! The comparison was exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. \$\endgroup\$
    – Upper_Case
    Aug 25, 2019 at 21:53
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ I like "the Longsword of not Orcus", I might steal this for my campaign. \$\endgroup\$
    – Mark
    Aug 26, 2019 at 12:03

Orcus' melee multiattack is limited to when he is wielding the Wand of Orcus.

The reason being that the stat block specifically states that the multiattack is with the Wand of Orcus, and specific rules supersede general rules (as stated in the Player's Handbook, p7, and XGtE, p5).

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ While correct, this seems to mostly reiterate what Dale M's answer already states. Could you clarify what your answer's intended to add? \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Aug 26, 2019 at 9:02
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Empahsises the specific beats general with correct reference. Admittedly I hadn't read all of Dale M's post, particularly the bit about affinity with the Wand; which made the final sentence a little redundant and I have now removed. \$\endgroup\$
    – ant_aoe
    Aug 26, 2019 at 9:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .