3
\$\begingroup\$

I recently answered a question along the same line as this one about how energy resistance affects regeneration, but sadly I have a new variation of it.

My question is about undead, their negative energy damage, and the worst part, their Con drain from natural attacks.

I am currently playing a character who is energy swapped; negative heals them and positive hurts them. I was attacked by a wraith and its spawn. So every time one of them beat my AC and touched me (which was frequent), I wasn't injured by the touch but I took the Con drain. I'm now wondering if that ruling was correct.

Since injury poison does not affect you when DR negates the damage, and energy damage shouldn't turn off regen if it doesn't hurt you, then shouldn't you be able to ignore Con drain because you didn't take damage from the attack?

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

Officially, the effects are two separate things, though I can’t really prove there isn’t any rule that, like with poison, protects you. I’m just fairly confident that there isn’t. So you’re left to asking your GM about it. Personally, I would probably waive it in this case, but I can see the argument for not doing so (after all, actual undead aren’t protected by the drain due to being healed by negative energy, they’re protected by the fact that they’re immune to ability drain in general—and that’s a feature you don’t have).

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Correction, I dont have it YET. Eventually this character should become a Lich...if he actually survives that long... Or fight undead like this again and gets turned into a spawn... \$\endgroup\$ – Fering Oct 7 '19 at 23:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.