7
\$\begingroup\$

When I heard about Eberron and its living spells, I almost immediately thought about a living Cure Wounds spell (or any "friendly" spell) that may become the pet of one of my players' characters. I never had the possibility to put them in a situation where they may encounter such spell... Until now.

But I have a problem: in both D&D 3.5e and 5e, I haven't found anyone use this kind of living spell, and I want to know if it is because I missed something in the creation rules of those monsters that say it is impossible, or if it's because I'm the only mad DM that have thought about that. Does such a living spell exist in RAW in either edition?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ You're not the only one - my players once walked inside an area where their spells might come alive and accidentally created a Living Light spell, but they were scared of it and destroyed it. I'm still sad about their missed chance to have a living spell buddy :( \$\endgroup\$ – Erik Jan 13 at 14:27
15
\$\begingroup\$

D&D 3.5e

In the original, D&D 3.5e Eberron Campaign Setting book, the living spell template is given this description:

“Living spell” is an unusual template, in that it is applied to an arcane or divine spell effect (or in some cases, a group of spell effects) and not to a creature. The characteristics of a living spell are determined by the nature of the spell(s), including the caster level of the spells. The template can be applied to any spells that create an area or effect (not targeted spells), but not a spell whose effect is already a creature (such as a summon monster spell).

Since the cure X wounds spells of 3.5e are targeted spells, they would not be eligible for becoming living spells.

However, there is no rule against “friendly” living spells. If some spell created an area of healing, for example, it could become a living spell. I’m not aware of any such spells that provide healing, however—though 3.5e had mass versions of many healing spells, these were multi-target, not area-effect. The only healing area spell I can find is Player’s Handbook II’s righteous burst—which healed allies while harming enemies, and so presumably does the same to the living spell’s allies and enemies.

There is, however, a spell that “create[s] an [...] effect,” and that effect applies healing—Player’s Handbook II’s healing spirit, which conjures a “spirit” of light that heals creatures by touching them. Healing spirit is eligible for the living spell template—technically. The spirit isn’t defined as a “creature” and doesn’t have stats like a creature, so RAW, it doesn’t fall into living spell’s prohibition on effects-that-are-creatures. But it should probably be nixed for the same reasons that summon monster is—it’s not at all clear to me how a living healing spirit would actually work. For example, the template says “A creature hit by a living spell’s slam attack is subjected to the normal effect of the spell [...] making up the creature.” No one is really “subjected” to healing spirit directly, the spell just conjures a spirit that you can direct to heal people afterwards. I suppose every slam attack conjures a new spirit? The target of the slam isn’t really “subjected” to it, though. The living spell’s engulf attack isn’t much better—I guess those conjure a new spirit each round it’s engulfing something? Pretty ridiculous. Moreover, the conjured spirits probably disappear when the attack and/or engulfing are over, which is weird too.

Anyway, there was, for the record, a prestige class in 3.5e called the spell sovereign, whose signature feature was a living spell companion. Various ways of controlling oozes—living spells are considered an ooze at least in 3.5e—could also get a friendly living spell. In the case of righteous burst, once friendly to the party it would presumably heal them.

D&D 5e

The 5e description of the living spell from Eberron: Rising from the Last War restricts it to conjurations or evocations for no good reason I can imagine (I’m pretty sure 3.5e adventures had living spells of other schools, and I know there have been other schools in games I’ve played and run), but does not require that it only be applied to an area or effect spell, so there is no problem with a single-target spell like cure wounds. And since cure wounds is an evocation in 5e (it was a conjuration in 3.5e, and has been a necromancy in other editions), it’s legal for becoming a living spell.

However, Eberron: Rising from the Last War does instruct DMs to take a spell “that deals damage” when creating a living spell. The way this is phrased is as an instruction, not a requirement, which is very strange. Whether you want to treat it as a requirement or not is, I suppose, up to you.

Finally, for the record, there is a 5e version of healing spirit, which works similarly and raises the same questions as the 3.5e version. It’s in Xanathar’s Guide to Everything. Thanks to Korvin Starmast for pointing it out, which also led me to the 3.5e version.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ On the 5e end, Eberron: Rising from the Last War doesn't posit the same restriction to AoE-only spells, specifying just that: "Living spells most often manifest from evocation and conjuration spells. To make a living spell from a different spell, choose a damage-dealing evocation or conjuration spell from the wizard spell list of up to 5th level." The preamble doesn't exclude the narrative possibility of non-damaging spells becoming living, but tells you you should choose from damaging conjurations or evocations when designing a new one. \$\endgroup\$ – Carcer Jan 13 at 14:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Carcer Interesting, I suppose; I still have to pick up Rising from the Last War. I find the restriction to conjurations or evocations really dumb, myself, but I don’t particularly have a problem with allowing “targeted” living spells. \$\endgroup\$ – KRyan Jan 13 at 14:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Healing Spirit (Druid, 2d level) from XGtE may fit your criteria for an area spell to use as an example: AFB at the moment. \$\endgroup\$ – KorvinStarmast Jan 13 at 15:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ For 3.5 material, Positive Energy Aura (from Planar Handbook but updated in the Spell Compendium) is a healing AOE spell, as is stabilize (from the Spell Compendium). Estanna's Stew and Darts of Life are similar to Healing Spirit in that they don't have targets and don't make creatures but also don't work. Estanna's Stew is also from BoED so it might not be worth mentioning just for that reason. \$\endgroup\$ – Please stop being evil Jan 13 at 19:00
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Here's a preview of the bit on living spells in E:RftLW from WotC's website: media.wizards.com/2019/dnd/dragon/28/DRA28_LivingSpells.pdf \$\endgroup\$ – V2Blast Jan 14 at 0:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.