I'm pretty sure the answer is no, but I just wanted to be sure I didn't miss a rule somewhere, after all it is an illusion.

Let's say I use Shadow Conjuration, Greater to duplicate Acid Storm that normally requires A flask of acid (10 gp) since Shadow Conjuration states:

You use material from the Plane of Shadow

The Material components are not necessary Am-I right? If there's such a spell that would require a focus/exp component is it ok to apply the same logic as well?


Yes - the answer is NO.

I can´t see a rule that you could have missed. There is no mentioning of any material component you need.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Maybe, things like Magic Jar are worth mentioning? Will it work without a focus gem? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 6 '20 at 5:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @annoying imp Magic Jar is a necromancy spell. So it cannot be mimicked by Shadow Conjuration or Shadow Evocation ... \$\endgroup\$ Mar 6 '20 at 8:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ @annoying imp if you can find other examples like this for Conjuration/Abjuration spells I'd be interested. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 6 '20 at 8:18
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @MaximeCuillerier I'd start with Contingency, but I'll check if I can find more Conj/Evoc spells where material components/focus are clearly intended to be the part of functioning spell, not just an extra fee to cast it. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 6 '20 at 10:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @MaximeCuillerier I actually didn't meant what you ask in a followup question. I reffered "You must carry the focus for the contingency to work." So even if you can cast Contingency without focus component, will or will not it work without it? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 6 '20 at 21:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.