3
\$\begingroup\$

I found some posts for 3.5e but there's not much information on incorporeal creatures attacking corporeal ones in the rules as far as I can find. It's pretty clear in the universal monster rules how attacking an incorporeal enemy works if your corporeal but not the other way around. Some lines in the description seem to imply that it can attack but it also says it has no physical effect on its surroundings which makes me wonder how it actually attacks.

An incorporeal creature’s attacks pass through (ignore) natural armor, armor, and shields, although deflection bonuses and force effects (such as mage armor) work normally against it. Incorporeal creatures pass through and operate in water as easily as they do in air. Incorporeal creatures cannot fall or take falling damage. Incorporeal creatures cannot make trip or grapple attacks, nor can they be tripped or grappled. In fact, they cannot take any physical action that would move or manipulate an opponent or its equipment, nor are they subject to such actions. Incorporeal creatures have no weight and do not set off traps that are triggered by weight.

It says its attacks ignore most forms of ac but it also says it cannot move or manipulate an opponent or it's equipment.

It says they can move things but poltergeists and a few other incorporeal enemies can via telekinesis.

Telekinesis (Su)

A poltergeist has no method of attacking apart from telekinesis. This ability functions as the spell telekinesis, with a CL equal to the poltergeist’s Hit Dice (CL 3rd for most poltergeists). A typical poltergeist has a ranged attack roll of +3 when using telekinesis to hurl objects or creatures, and can use the ability on objects or creatures of up to 75 pounds. If a poltergeist attempts to hurl a creature with this ability, that creature can resist the effect with a successful DC 12 Will save. The save DC is Charisma-based.

So at least in the case of a poltergeist, they can only attack indirectly.

A haunt can use an "incorporeal touch attack" according to a few if it skills but the description of the incorporeal ability seems to imply incorporeal creatures can't interact with the environment.

Alternate Form (Su) A haunt's natural form is that of a translucent image appearing much as the person did in life. As a standard action, it can alter its form so as to appear as a floating, luminescent ball of light (possibly being mistaken for a will-o'-wisp in this form). In this form, it cannot use its Dexterity damage attack or its malevolence attack. It retains its incorporeal form and can make an incorporeal touch attack that deals normal damage (but not Dex damage). A haunt remains in one form or the other until it chooses to assume a new one (as a standard action). A change in form cannot be dispelled. A haunt cannot change forms while using its malevolence attack (that is, while possessing a host).

Comozant wyrds can latch onto stuff and use their whip attack to hurt stuff.

Plasma Form (Ex) Although incorporeal, a comozant wyrd can't hide inside solid objects. It must start its turn attached to the outside of something that's solid and of Small size or larger, or else it takes 5 points of damage. Anyone attacking the wyrd must either take a -4 penalty on the attack roll or resolve the attack against whatever the wyrd is attached to as well.

-

Lightning Lash (Su)

As a standard action that doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity, a comozant wyrd can shock any creature or object within 30 feet to which it has line of effect, dealing 2d8 electricity damage. The wyrd can choose for this damage to be nonlethal. If the target is also affected by the wyrd's illuminating flames, it is stunned for 1 round (Fortitude DC 16 negates) and the flames are dispelled. The save DC is Charisma-based.

My main point of confusion is the lack of clarity in the description of the incorporeal ability, it says they can't move stuff but multiple incorporeal enemies have telekinesis and thus can move stuff, they can't grab it with hands per say but they can still move stuff. If they can't touch things directly how come Comozant wyrds can latch onto stuff despite being incorporeal. If it can latch unto stuff how come it can't trip or move stuff? Are these exceptions? Does magic like stuff such as lightning lash not count as interacting with the environment? If they can interact with the environment when why can't they move things? There's too much stuff that contradicts itself.

Can someone point me to a clear statement on the rules regarding how they do so.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah, okay. The body of your post seems to be missing the question, then (the title should just be treated as a summary - the question should be clearly stated in the body of the post itself). I assume you're asking how an incorporeal creature can directly attack a corporeal one, since you already have an example of an indirect one? \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 30, 2020 at 19:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ @V2Blast I edited it since I found more information. My main point of confusion is the lack of clarity and consistency in the description of the incorporeal ability, it says they can't move stuff but multiple incorporeal enemies have telekinesis and thus can move stuff, they can't grab it with hands per say but they can move stuff, if they can't touch things directly how come Comozant wyrds can latch onto stuff despite being incorporeal. Are these exceptions? Does magic like stuff such as lightning lash not count as interacting with the environment? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 30, 2020 at 19:15

3 Answers 3

2
\$\begingroup\$

There's a bit going with incorporeal creatures, mostly consisting of Paizo wanting to have their cake and eat it too. Some of the examples you've mentioned are exceptions to the rules, and some of them are getting through loopholes in the rules.

For the Poltergeists Telekinesis ability, it's using a loophole where it's just casting the spell Telekinesis at will, and the spell is interacting with the corporeal objects/creatures. In the case of the Comozant Weird, it's an exception to the rule, where it is allowed to interact with objects of a particular size in a particular manner. The Lightning Lash is another "getting through loopholes" ability. The Wyrd isn't interacting with the corporeal creatures, it's only shaping some nearby energy, and that energy is what's interacting with the corporeal.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ So by that logic, evocation spells would work because by definition evocation is the manipulation of energy. Correct? If that's the case does that mean anything that uses a medium works? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 30, 2020 at 19:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MageintheBarrel Yes, in my opinion that would be the case. After all, incorporeal creatures are only unable to interact with corporeal objects and creatures. Since energy is neither of these things, it gets around it as a loophole. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 30, 2020 at 20:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ I believe somewhere in the incorporeal rules it specifies that energy damage, including spells, do 1/2 damage to incorporeal creatures (unless it's Force damage, which does full). \$\endgroup\$
    – Ifusaso
    Mar 31, 2020 at 1:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Ifusaso Also correct, although the source of the energy damage still has to be magical or extraordinary in nature, so a fireball will harm something incorporeal, but a bonfire would not. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 3, 2020 at 14:48
1
\$\begingroup\$

How do incorporeal creatures attack interact with their environment?

I think you have really illustrated the answer in your question. If you want a passage in the rules that will explicitly spell it out, I'm not sure that exists. However, if did someone here will know it.

Attacking an incorporeal critter requires a corporeal attacker to have magic weapons, spells, spell-like abilities, or supernatural abilities. Nothing normal will work. It seems that you are taking all that in and asking "why?"

The very definition of the word "incorporeal" as related to this topic is:

  1. not corporeal or material; insubstantial.
  2. of, relating to, or characteristic of nonmaterial beings.

Think of it this way, it's like trying to touch the dark. It may be all around you, covering everything in the room but you have no hope of picking it up or moving it by any normal method (your hands, a cup, a shovel, rope and pulley, etc...) Any such attempt passes through the darkness without effect.

While the rules may not explicitly say so, I think it's safe to take the fact that they called it an "incorporeal" form to mean I can treat it, in-game, as if you can't touch it by any normal means. Things just pass through it. It just passes through things. Doors. Walls. Any of these mundane things would not be a barrier.

For these reasons, in my D&D games, attacks by an incorporeal creature (that don't involve using a physical object via abilities like telekinesis) leave no visible mark and don't affect (and are not affected by) the physical world.

\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

I would use the rule in the spell compendium, ghostwalk, page 103.

Your attacks while in ghostform pass through (ignore) natural armor, armor, and shields, although deflection bonuses and force effects (such as mage armor) work normally against you. Nonmagical attacks you make with a melee weapon have no effect on corporeal targets, and any melee attack you make with a magic weapon against a corporeal target has a 50% miss chance, except for attacks you make with a ghost touch weapon, which are made normally (no miss chance).

Spells you cast while in ghostform affect corporeal targets normally, including spells that require you to make an attack roll (such as rays or melee touch spells).

For this last bit I have to say that I don't agree as it puts the incorporeal on a favourable position vs corporeal (corporeal have a chance of miss 50% when they cast a spell).

\$\endgroup\$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .