2
\$\begingroup\$

I know there aren't as many as fighter bonus feats, but I discovered there are more than the ones listed in the PHB (Stunning Fist/Improved Grapple, Combat Reflexes/Reflect Arrows, Improved Disarm/Improved Trip). such as in the PHB2, where you can get Fiery Fist, Ki Blast and Fiery Ki Defense, or in the Eberron campaign guide is also Monastic Training, which you can get at either 1st, 2nd or 6th level.

Is there any way I can look for all of them or do I have to look at every single feat in every single 3.5 book to see if there is any more? Google does not help much in this aspect.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Partial answer that I might try to work into something more complete.

  • Alternative Class Features List covers a lot of things, because it’s pretty comprehensive for all alternative class features, substitution levels, variant levels or features, and so on. Many monk options for feats come from such things, so that will cover many of them. It does not cover things like Fiery Fist or Monastic Training that are feats that say they can be selected by monks, but

  • This post in that same thread does list many of those, and many more. I do not know how comprehensive it is.

Neither list covers monk fighting styles, which are a major source of alternative bonus feat options. There may also be other things that offer options, either other categories that aren’t covered, or things that are under the remit of one of these but has simply been missed.

\$\endgroup\$
9
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does that make the answer to the question "no"? But you're trying to link to separate off-site lists that may combine to have them? \$\endgroup\$
    – NautArch
    Jun 15 '20 at 16:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @NautArch I’m not saying “no” because I don’t know (and certainly can’t back up) that there isn’t—this is just the best I’m aware of. \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    Jun 15 '20 at 16:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't know enough about 3.5, but could the question be changed to ask for the complete list here? Or is it too broad and/or other issues? \$\endgroup\$
    – NautArch
    Jun 15 '20 at 16:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ I could accept this answer if anyone could back up those lists completeness, since they are very good. \$\endgroup\$
    – Karrion42
    Jun 15 '20 at 16:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @NautArch It could be, but I don’t think there’s any need to—it’s pretty well-established here that when someone asks for a resource, simply providing that resource in an answer is a valid answer to the question. And I don’t think a partial answer is going to dissuade anyone inclined to do that from doing it (or from linking a better resource, if one exists). \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    Jun 15 '20 at 16:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.