First off, so no one branches too far out, the character I am making will be a human variant totem barbarian (bear all the way through). Also, I will not take any more feats after the one I pick to start with so no Polearm Master/Sentinel comboing. These are character choices that are set in stone for me.

I will either pick Spear Mastery (from this Unearthed Arcana article) and switch between dual wielding spears and throwing one and then using two hands with the other spear, or I'll go Polearm Master and flavor a glaive as a great spear but it will stay a glaive in all but name so no throwing range and no Versatile property.

Which one, given these restrictions, is the better choice for damage and battle field control?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @justaguy No worries, we just have a policy against guessing the system, even if it is quite clear what system you are playing. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 25, 2020 at 16:24
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ A rather complicated, perhaps unneeded question: Will the GM allow the following to work: Start your turn with a spear in hand, draw a second spear (using your object interaction), throw one spear (using the Attack action), put a second hand onto the remaining spear (for free), attack using it ("using" Extra Attack), take a hand off of it (for free), repeat? There's some action-economy weirdness where a GM might say you can't add a second hand onto a spear for free or that you can't remove a hand from a spear for free, so I'm just wondering whether that's already been resolved/discussed \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 25, 2020 at 16:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Medix2 that has not been discussed and im not sure we will have a chance to descuss before start of game. so for now assume the answer is no. \$\endgroup\$
    – just a guy
    Commented Jun 25, 2020 at 16:35

1 Answer 1


Polearm Master should be usually better, but Spear Mastery has the potential to deal more damage on early levels

Both weapons will deal 1d10 damage on hit. Spear Mastery gives +1 on the modifier and allows you to use your Bonus Action + Reaction to attack someone who enters your reach, for an extra 1d10 damage.

So, let us consider a first round, with and without Rage (I will use +2 as the rage damage). For now, let us ignore the +1 bonus on the modifier from Spear Mastery.


On hit, you will deal an average (5.5 + 3 + [2]) on the weapon hit, then (2.5 + 3 + [2]) on the bonus action hit then (5.5 + 3 + [2]) on the reaction, for a total of 22.5/[28.5] (without/[with] rage).

Spear Mastery

On hit, you will deal an average (5.5 + 3 + [2]) on the weapon hit, and (5.5 + 5.5 + 3 + [2]) on the reaction, for a total of 22.5/[26.5] damage.

Surely, with the +1 to hit, the Spear Mastery will outdamage the PAM without rage, and, depending on the enemy's AC, may outdamage with rage as well.

But the thing is: most combats do not involve enemies constantly leaving and entering your range. With PAM, it is fairly simple to move one step back, and keep this type of control. On the other hand, Spear Mastery requires you to be at least 20 ft. away from the enemy when you use the bonus action. I have been playing a PAM Fighter and quite often I can not use my reaction, because enemies are not that dumb, and will find a way to dodge me, attack from range or whatever tactics that nullifies my reaction attack. As an example, many times, combats happen in dungeons where your movement is severely limited, and constantly kiting and being 20 ft. away will be a problem.

Finally, Spear Mastery is situational in the sense you need to call one enemy to target. If that one enemy does not enter your range, but all others do, you can not attack them, and your bonus action is lost.

So, when we consider the scenario that most likely is going to appear on a second round of the combat, with enemies already in range, PAM will deal two attacks, and Spear Mastery will only be a +1 bonus (although it does free your bonus action). In this case, PAM will always outdamage Spear Mastery.

There is also the problem of actually activating Rage: it costs a bonus action. With PAM, you are losing the 1d4 attack, but with spear mastery, you now can not use the reaction from the feat any more, as it requires both the bonus action and the reaction.

And, finally, PAM will get even better as you level. For every extra point in Strength (modifier) you get, the PAM will increase 1 more damage on hit compared to Spear Mastery, and the same for Rage Damage, same for Magic Weapons, etc., as PAM allows one more attack than SM.

For comparison, consider a 9th level Barbarian, with 20 Str and +3 Rage damage. SM is slightly better for ACs 22 or higher, which are not that common, and PAM is slightly better elsewhere, considerably better for low AC enemies (auto-hit enemies, AC <= 11). The figure is done considering you can actually use all your attacks.

enter image description here

Then again, consider how more situational the Spear Mastery is, and PAM should be the superior choice.

So, to conclude, Polearm Master is considerably less situational than Spear Mastery, allowing it to be used more frequently, and, as you level, it will become superior in every way. The only scenario I can see Spear Mastery being more useful is if you think you are going to face many enemies outside your range (and that you can not approach), in a way that constantly throwing your spear is something that will show up often. In my experience, this setup is very rare, so I would go with PAM.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thanks again for your helpful answer. I think I will go with Spear Mastery anyway since this is a roleplay heavy campaign and I like the idea of some better ranged attacks. \$\endgroup\$
    – just a guy
    Commented Jul 3, 2020 at 5:19
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @justaguy Yeah, I didn't mention in the answer but in general I would not worry about choosing either. Both are quite good anyway, and unless you are playing a challenging campaign that relies on all characters being optimized, go with what you feel funnier \$\endgroup\$
    – HellSaint
    Commented Jul 3, 2020 at 15:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .