6
\$\begingroup\$

In 3.5 D&D there is a Leadership Feat. It allows you to gain a cohort and some followers, a whole bunch of followers if your score is high enough.

But, what is the origin of this Leadership concept in D&D, where did this idea of leading a whole group of people come from, and why is this even an option given that most games seem to revolve around only the player characters rather than characters + groupies? That would be a whole lot of people to keep track of if every player character was a leader!

I would like to know about the background and history of this concept in D&D, or is it new to the 3.5 edition?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to RPG.SE! Check out the tour and the help center to learn more about the site! \$\endgroup\$ Jul 14 '20 at 15:18
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SeanDuggan I'm looking forward to reading that answer, but I have to remove those as answers in comments. You may want to follow and/or bookmark the question to help you find it again. \$\endgroup\$
    – Someone_Evil
    Jul 14 '20 at 15:33
5
\$\begingroup\$

Recruiting an army dates back to earlier editions of D&D.

Dungeons & Dragons originated in tabletop wargaming, and players sometimes developed a series of battles as a campaign, the simulation of which extended to the conquest of real-world or fictional territory, the establishment of castles, and the hiring of troops. This concept transferred naturally into D&D.

In the original 1974 D&D rules, characters could hire men-at-arms and other forces, at a price. Clerics who reached a certain level could build a stronghold and acquire faithful followers who serve at no cost, while fighters could similarly acquire troops and establish themselves as a baron.

In AD&D 1st edition, a fighter who attains 9th level may establish a freehold, automatically attracting a body of men-at-arms, though he must still pay them a monthly fee. The cleric likewise can establish a religion stronghold.

You similarly see rules like this in the AD&D 2nd edition Player's Handbook, where the 9th level fighter attracts both low-level men-at-arms and an elite bodyguard ("bodyguard" in this case meaning a unit of troops, not just one individual). A table allows the fighter to roll to see what sort of units he might recruit. The cleric still gets to build a stronghold and can attract loyal followers.

D&D 3.0 removed the fighter and cleric's ability to acquire minions, but instead used the feat system to open this ability up to characters of all classes. The idea of Leadership modifiers is similar to the hireling rules in OD&D, where one's Charisma score affects the number of hirelings you can have and how loyal they will be, and the manner in which you treat your men can affect their loyalty.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is what they used to call "name level", isn't it? \$\endgroup\$
    – Zachiel
    Jul 14 '20 at 17:07
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Zachiel - It's closely related, at least. In early editions of D&D, each class had its own unique XP table (thieves needed fewer XP to reach a given level than magic-users) and these tables included titles for each level. (dungeonsdragons.fandom.com/wiki/Level_title) "Name level" was when you got the "final" title, usually 9th level, which was also the same time that you started to attract followers (as opposed to going out to look for people to hire). \$\endgroup\$ Jul 15 '20 at 11:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.