13
\$\begingroup\$

Can someone with nondetection be picked up with detect magic? It seems to me that detect magic will sense a magical aura (perhaps abjuration or illusion) since it does not target the creature.

Also, I see nowhere that states that detect magic is a scrying sensor.

Scrying is non-targeted Divination. Why does it state this if nondetection would just work on it? Detect magic is also non-targeted, and not specified, so it would work.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This is going to be nitpicky either way, but here is something fairly unrelated: while looking for more supporting material, I accidentally found out that you cannot cast detect magic on yourself if you are under the effect of nondetection (since detect magic actually targets self). Mind slightly blown. \$\endgroup\$ – J.E Jul 28 at 13:21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Nice! that does make sense. \$\endgroup\$ – CrimRei Jul 28 at 13:24
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Related, in a way: "Do Nondetection and Invisibility protect you from True Seeing?" \$\endgroup\$ – Medix2 Jul 28 at 14:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does my answer sufficiently solve your problem, enough for a green check? \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Markov Nov 19 at 13:37
16
\$\begingroup\$

I present two different, independent arguments, hopefully at least one is helpful.

Nondetection says it hides the target from divination magic.

Flavorful language in spell descriptions are rules too.

The description of nondetection says:

you hide a target that you touch from divination magic.

Detect magic is a divination spell, and nondetection says it hides you from it. Case closed.

Areas of effect may target creatures inside them.

Alternatively, we can make an argument that specifically addresses the relevant mechanics.

The Dungeon Master's Guide speaks of creatures inside areas of effect as "targets" in the section on combat:

If you would like more guidance, consider using the Targets in Areas of Effect table.

So when nondetection says,

The target can't be targeted by any divination magic,

it means that divination magic with an area of effect does not detect the creature who is under the effect of nondetection.

In contrast, the rules use the more specific phrase "target directly" when an effect is not an area of effect. Note the rules for total cover:

A target with total cover can't be targeted directly by an attack or a spell, although some spells can reach such a target by including it in an area of effect.

The point of these examples is to demonstrate that the rules respect creatures inside of areas of effect as "targets" and areas of effect as "targeting" them.

This answer goes into greater detail.

Mostly joke argument, but kinda for real.

Its called nondetection, obviously it defeats detect magic.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Let us continue this discussion in chat. \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Markov Jul 28 at 12:44
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ @CrimRei Once a comment thread has been moved to chat, please refrain from continuing it in the comments section. Also absolutely do not reproduce deleted comments. Users have the right to delete their comments. If yours no longer make sense the correct thing to do it to remove your own or flag for moderator attention. For the record the full transcript of comments was already preserved in the chat thread linked in the above comment. \$\endgroup\$ – linksassin Jul 28 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.