Scenario: An archer has two targets, both of which are at long range (i.e more than 80 feet and less than 320 feet for a shortbow). One of these targets is invisible. Is it correct that the archer has the same chance of hitting despite the fact that one target is invisible?
PHB Ranged Attacks
Some Ranged Attacks, such as those made with a Longbow or a Shortbow, have two ranges. The smaller number is the normal range, and the larger number is the long range. Your Attack roll has disadvantage when your target is beyond normal range, and you can’t attack a target beyond the long range.
PHB Unseen Attackers and Targets
Combatants often try to escape their foes’ notice by Hiding, casting the Invisibility spell, or lurking in darkness.
When you Attack a target that you can’t see, you have disadvantage on the attack roll. This is true whether you’re guessing the target’s location or you’re targeting a creature you can hear but not see. If the target isn’t in the location you targeted, you automatically miss, but the DM typically just says that the attack missed, not whether you guessed the target’s location correctly.
Assuming there are no other cover modifiers, as disadvantage doesn't stack (no such thing as double-disadvantage) does this mean that a shot at each target is made with disadvantage despite the fact that one is invisible and one's not? And so each shot has the same chance of hitting?