7
\$\begingroup\$

I have seen from many different sources the thought process that you can have your Alchemical Homunculus or your Steel Defender use your spell storing item. This would let them take up concentration for an additional spell.

However the more I look into it the less I think you can. I wanted to get clarification from you folks.

Spell Storing item:

While holding the object, a creature can take an action to produce the spell’s effect from it, using your spellcasting ability modifier. If the spell requires concentration, the creature must concentrate.

Alchemical Homunculus:

In combat, the homunculus shares your initiative count, but it takes its turn immediately after yours. It can move and use its reaction on its own, but the only action it takes on its turn is the Dodge action, unless you take a bonus action on your turn to command it to take the action in its stat block or the Dash, Disengage, Help, Hide, or Search action.

Steel Defender:

In combat, the steel defender shares your initiative count, but it takes its turn immediately after yours. It can move and use its reaction on its own, but the only action it takes on its turn is the Dodge action, unless you take a bonus action on your turn to command it to take one of the actions in its stat block or the Dash, Disengage, Help, Hide, or Search action.

I added emphasis on only. This completely negates the ability to use the Spell Storing Item in combat doesn’t it?

\$\endgroup\$
11
\$\begingroup\$

After errata, those creatures can use a Spell Storing Item

As part of the errata accompanying the reprint in Tasha's Cauldron of Everything (pre-errata answer below), these command rule for these creatures where updated to say:

It can move and use its reaction on its own, but the only action it takes on its turn is the Dodge action, unless you take a bonus action on your turn to command it to take another action. That action can be one in its stat block or some other action. If you are incapacitated, the homunculus can take any action of its choice, not just Dodge.

This enables them to use any action including the Use an Object action (as clarified by the SAC) used by the Spell Storing Item to produce the spell effect.


Before errata, those creatures can't use a Spell Storing Item

The key here is that the Spell Storing Item requires a creature to use a special (unnamed/Use a Magic Item) action to produce the spell's effects. Both these creatures are limited to taking the Dodge action (if not given a command), taking one of the listed generic actions, or taking an action in it's stat block (where the Spell Storing Item is not written).

The override here (ie. DM ruling/houserule) would be deciding that a creature/monster having an object would add any relevant special actions to its stat block (as would presumably be done when the DM customizes a monster), but there is no rule covering whether this happens dynamically or not. Without such a ruling they can't use the item.


†: This action is named as Use a Magic Item in the Essentials Kit and in many discussions, but not in the Player's Handbook nor the Dungeon Master's Guide. Regardless it is distinct from Use Object and Cast a Spell, not that it happens to be relevant here.

\$\endgroup\$
0
5
\$\begingroup\$

Now those creatures might use Spell Storing Item!

An errata has been released for the Eberron: Rising from the Last War, which changed the description of the actions both the Steel Defender and the Alchemical Homunculus. Now it reads:

“...but the only action it takes on its turn is the Dodge action, unless you take a bonus action on your turn to command it to take another action. That action can be one in its stat block or some other action."

So it no longer limit the actions it can take as previously, so it could use a magical item. Naturally if it makes sense for him to be able to use it depending on his shape.

\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

This possibility to take another action does not seem to incorporate that steel defenders can carry items in the first place. The stat block clearly states that adding two or four legs does not change its stats. This seems to imply that adding arms and hands would not either, otherwise its stats could be changed by adding a shield to it and so on.

You determine the creature’s appearance and whether it has two legs or four; your choice has no effect on its game statistics.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This does not answer the original question, rather it appears to be a comment on the other answers. I would advise that you improve it more clearly answer the original question and provide appropriate citations where you see fit. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 1 at 1:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .