An enemy had grabbed a friendly NPC and was using him as a hostage and standing behind him as cover. The (new) DM seemed to be implying that the archers in our party would risk shooting the friendly.

I thought sacred flame would be good because it can target creatures in cover and seems to go through the environment without damaging anything else. So we reasoned that sacred flame would just fry the enemy and leave our friendly unharmed.

Would sacred flame potentially damage a creature other than the intended target? Or does it only affect the targeted creature?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. \$\endgroup\$
    – V2Blast
    Oct 24, 2020 at 22:40

1 Answer 1


No, sacred flame will not hurt the hostage

The description of sacred flame reads (PHB, p. 272; emphasis mine):

Flame-like radiance descends on a creature that you can see within range. The target must succeed on a Dexterity saving throw or take 1d8 radiant damage. The target gains no benefit from cover for this saving throw.

The spell hits the target, and cover has no effect on the spell. If a creature was using cover, and attacks were liable to hit that cover (as you said the ranged weapon attacks would be in this example), sacred flame would ignore the cover and would not potentially damage the cover.

This might be stylized as a bolt of holy fire arcing to strike from above, ignoring horizontal cover, but this stylization does not mean the attack would be blocked from cover above either.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ notably, you still need to be able to see the target. Thus, if he was hiding entirely behind the hostage, this spell wouldn't work. But then again, it's highly difficult to 100% hide behind a person you're grabbing without exposing at least your arm. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 18, 2020 at 9:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .