In "Does Burning Hands really require touching thumbs?", it has been established that burning hands does indeed require touching thumbs. A question that is danced around there is, "is the touching thumbs the somatic component?" This question also extends to spells like dissonant whispers (verbal component) and message (verbal/somatic component). In other words, when a spell specifies something in its description, outside the component list, that could be nonetheless be construed as the component, is it in fact a component, or even the component?

I'm inclined to think such descriptions are the component, but am unsure. This does have some weird implications if so, like "how loud does one dissonantly whisper?" and "can someone else hear my whispered message?" (I don't need these answered here; I just include them because they are related, depending on the answer.)

  • \$\begingroup\$ Notably, we do have a lot of questions similar to what you're asking about the message cantrip: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 18, 2020 at 19:48
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Medix2 Incredible. I picked the one spell as an example that nobody has asked about, confusing SE enough to not recommend any of these. Thanks a million. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 18, 2020 at 20:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ The gist of all the answers about message is that something not listed as a component is not a component, and something that is listed as an effect is not a component. This is noteworthy here mainly because both answers to this question contradict the general thrust of answers to all the other questions. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 19, 2020 at 8:36

2 Answers 2


Yes, and it's up to the player whether it is the sole component or not.

As an example, take the description of Burning Hands:

As you hold your hands with thumbs touching and fingers spread, a thin sheet of flames shoots forth from your outstretched fingertips. Each creature in a 15-foot cone must make a Dexterity saving throw. A creature takes 3d6 fire damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.

Hence, as soon as the thumbs touch and the fingers are spread and the wizard maintain this position, the flames explode and hit enemies and objects in front of the wizard. Hence they are surely a somatic component.

There is not any indication about somatic components to be done before the thumbs touching. The thumbs touching can be seen as the only somatic component or as the final gesture to finalize the casting: this is a player's choice, how he/she decides to describe the casting of this spell.


Yes, in general.

The PHB actually defines spell components:

A spell's components are the physical requirements you must meet in order to cast it. Each spell's description indicates whether it requires verbal (V), somatic (S), or material (M) components.

It later identifies somatic components as "spellcasting gestures".

Burning hands specifies a physical act that must be performed to cast the spell. This fits the definition of a spell component, and it's a hand gesture rather than a spoken word or a material object, so it is a somatic component.

Same for dissonant whispers, except that the act is chanting or singing the discordant melody, so it's a verbal component.

Gray area: suggestion, command, etc.

Spells that require you to speak what you want the spell to do are tricky. Consider command: "You speak a one-word command to a creature you can see within range." I would read that as a verbal component, since you are required to speak the command for the spell to work. On the other hand, verbal components are described as "mystic words", implying that they're not an ordinary word like "Kneel!" used with command. On the other other hand, that sentence starts with "Most spells", leaving open the possibility that some spells require speaking normal words instead of, or in addition to, the mystic words. (Vicious mockery, for example, clearly requires speaking words with both mundane and arcane meaning: "a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments".)

There's been much discussion over whether these spells require "mystic words" to be spoken, especially in the case of suggestion, where it's really not in your interest to signal that you're casting a spell. But that's a separate issue.

The real question is, why does it matter whether the mundane words are a verbal component? You have to say them anyway. I suppose someone might argue that they can use Subtle Spell to cast command without saying the word out loud, but that's a question for the DM to settle when it happens.

Gray area: spells that make weapon attacks (green-flame blade, etc.)

Since the weapon attack is a physical act that makes the spell work, it is a component, and green-flame blade lists "weapon" as a material component, but claims not to have a somatic component. That seems correct: you have to do something with the weapon, but attacking is not a "gesture" as such. Instead, the attack should be treated as a special kind of component separate from the usual V/S/M categories.

However, again, what difference does it make? Even if it was a somatic component, nobody's going to cast a Subtle green-flame blade where they don't attack anyone. That's the whole point of the spell. Similarly, if a magic item enables you to cast the spell without components, it would need to specify how you attack without the required weapon (most likely the magic item itself would be the weapon). It's hard to see a case where it matters.


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .