11
\$\begingroup\$

My group is playing DnD 5e. We encountered an ancient blue dragon who cast Prismatic Spray at us. Our Ranger/Druid, who was in Air Elemental wildshape at the time, got struck by the Indigo Ray and failed his Dexterity Save:

6-Indigo: On a failed save, the target is Restrained. It must then make a Constitution saving throw at the end of each of its turns. If it successfully saves three times, the spell ends. If it fails its save three times, it permanently turns to stone and is subjected to the Petrified condition. The successes and failures don't need to be consecutive, keep track of both until the target collects three of a kind.

Because he was an Air Elemental, he was immune to being restrained, but the DM had him continue to make making Con saves for the 2nd half of that Ray's effects. Just before he (unknowingly) failed the third Con save, he transformed back into his usual Eladrin form, and became a Petrified stone statue as per the spell's effects.

Upon defeating the dragon, the group attempted to restore him to his usual form using a Greater Restoration spell that he had stored in a Ring of Spell Storing. The spell successfully removed the Petrified condition, but because the spell says the creature "permanently turns to stone", our DM ruled that he was now a living stone statue, unless/until he could find some other way to return him to flesh-and-blood status. This transformation came with a -2 to Dex (his main stat) but a +1 to Strength and Con, and some damage resistances. He's not altogether miffed by these changes and likes the flavor of the ruling, but I'm wondering, should Greater Restoration have worked on its own to return him fully to flesh and blood, even if the spell says "permanently"?

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ I guess that depends on what my DM says hahah \$\endgroup\$ – user67798 Jan 11 at 1:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ I suppose it may be too late to go back :P I can understand why the ruling was made, some rulings are tough to get right on the fly, and easy to get right when you’ve got an hour to go through the books. \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Markov Jan 11 at 1:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ Does my answer solve your problem well enough for a green check? \$\endgroup\$ – Thomas Markov Feb 2 at 13:52
19
\$\begingroup\$

"Permanently" is just a duration.

The use of the word "permanently" in the description of the Indigo ray is a duration, not a statement preventing the curing of the petrification. Compare to the cockatrice's Bite effect:

On a failure, the creature is petrified for 24 hours.

Stating that the target of prismatic spray is "permanently" turned to stone means that the petrification does not wear off with time - further intervention is required, such as greater restoration:

You imbue a creature you touch with positive energy to undo a debilitating effect. You can reduce the target's exhaustion level by one, or end one of the following effects on the target:

  • One effect that charmed or petrified the target

Notably, greater restoration does not just cure petrification, it ends the entire effect that petrified the target. So your friend is no longer made of stone, nor petrified.

Air elementals are immune to petrification.

The air elemental's immunities are:

Condition Immunities Exhaustion, Grappled, Paralyzed, Petrified, Poisoned, Prone, Restrained, Unconscious

So the druid should have been entirely immune to the wall's effects in the first place.

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.