I have recently created a ranger subclass called the tracker, which is made for a group of rangers focused on purging threats (natural and unnatural) from their home. I updated the tracker from the previous question found at Is this homebrew ranger subclass balanced? (thanks ValhallaGH for the tips).

First Strike: When you choose this subclass, you can quickly get the jump on your enemies. On your first turn in combat, your weapons deal an extra 1D8 damage. This damage increases to 2D8 at 11th level.

Changes: I made the damage scale up at increased levels.
My Idea: This is made to be similar to colossus slayer for the hunter, and it likely will add a similar amount of damage (2D8 assuming longbow extra attack at 5th level)

Defensive Tactics: At 7th level, your favored enemies have disadvantage on attack rolls against you.

Changes: Instead of giving a passive armor class boost, I gave the favored enemies disadvantage, making it easier to remember.
My Idea: It was made to give you a defensive bonus similar to the hunter's defensive options.

Master of thy Enemy: At 11th level, you have a +2 bonus to attack and damage rolls against your favored enemies. You also gain an additional favored enemy, learning an associated language as normal.

Changes: I scrapped the previous feature and moved this one up from 15th level
My Idea: This increases the flexibility of the subclass, giving them an additional enemy, and increases their skill against all favored enemies.

Retaliation: At 15th level, you have learned to punish those who harm you with uncanny speed. When you are hit by an attack, you can use your reaction to make an attack against the creature who harmed you. You have advantage on the attack roll and deal an extra 2D8 damage on a hit.

Changes: Completely new feature based off of existing class features for the Barbarian.
Idea: Based off of the Berserkers retaliation feature, this feature gives the ranger power both offensively and defensively by discouraging enemies to attack them and increasing their damage output.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your updates and for helping to make your question the best it can be for us to answer! \$\endgroup\$ – NautArch Mar 17 at 15:55

A couple of notes: This subclass has 2 features that involve being attacked, so I will assume this class is intended to be for a melee ranger as opposed to a ranged ranger, in order to take advantage of these abilities. It is perfectly fine for a subclass to specialize with one weapon type over another, and I will be reviewing based on that.

Balanced, though not always effective.

I'll break down each feature, then summarize.

First Strike:

A Similar 3rd level ranger subclass features can be found with the Gloom Stalker feature Dread Ambusher (Xanathar's p.42-43):

...If you take the Attack action on that turn, you can make one additional weapon attack as part of that action. If that attack hits, the target takes an extra 1d8 damage of the weapon's damage type.

This would likely would match First Strike's damage from 5th to 10th level, but First Strike would exceed beyond 11th level due to the extra damage; I think that is okay, as Dread ambusher has a few other bonuses. I think this ability is balanced.

Defensive Tactics:

This Feature is nice, though it may fall into the Tank Fallacy: the better your defenses, the less likely you are to be targeted. With it already being limited to your favored enemies, it may not see a lot of use besides an initial swing, before the foe changes targets. (Yes, it is not typical of the Ranger to be a parties tank, however they do have a d10 dice roll, and are likely able to take more hits than any full casters in the party)

Master of thy Enemy (MotE):

I think this is a great feature. An additional favored enemy is always needed for the Ranger. At 11th level, an optimized character should have +9 chance to hit on a standard attack. Increasing this to +11 means you are now 22% more effective, and you get some extra damage.
Most other ranger abilities at this level are some form of an additional attack: the Hunter makes as many attacks as there are present enemies in range, the Gloom Stalker and Horizon Walker get an extra attack (conditionally), the Fey Wanderer gets an ally capable of making an attack, and the Beast Master gets an additional attack for their companion.
If you are a dueling Ranger, your optimized average damage at 11th level should be 1d8+7, an average of 11.5 damage per hit. All of the above features give you (roughly) an additional attack, which, for simplicity, we will assume is the same damage average. For MotE, you are given +2 damage, but you are also 22% more effective, so assuming that I know how to do useful math:

11.5 * 3 attacks = 34.5 "standard"
11.5+2 * 2 attacks * 1.222 effectiveness = 33 damage

For Two Weapon Fighting, we have one more attack to consider, dealing 1d6+5 damage, an average of 8.5:

8.5 * 4 attacks = 34 damage "standard"
8.5+2 * 3 attacks * 1.222 effectiveness = 38.5 damage MotE

And for Archery, +2 on attack rolls increases the Rangers effectiveness: your additional effectiveness from MotE is 18.2%, a total of 40.4%:

9.5 * 3 attacks * 1.222 effectiveness = 34.8 damage "standard"
9.5+2 * 2 attacks * 1.404 effectiveness = 32.3 damage MotE

So its damage slightly less for Dueling and Archery, and somewhat more for Two Weapon Fighting. I think this is as close to balanced as you are going to get, without a major change to the feature.


I am assuming here the reaction attack is a weapon attack, and requires the target to be in range of said weapon.
This is a good feature, but like the 7th level feature I worry this will fall under the tank fallacy: why is an enemy going to target this Ranger when they are heavily punished for it, when there are other combatants in the party they can target instead? As with Defensive Tactics, while the feature is interesting and balanced, it is not likely to see a lot of use, provided the DM is playing the enemy combatants intelligently.


This subclass is balanced. However, its defensive features will likely not come into play frequently, due to your enemies avoiding fighting you in order to not be punished. What you may want to consider is changes to encourage taking advantage of these features.
Some subclasses that do a good job of working as a tank are the Barbarian's Path of the Ancestral Guardian, and the Fighter's Cavalier. These subclasses have ways to punish an enemy for not attacking them, encouraging themselves to be the center of attention on the battlefield. While a 'tank' may not have been your intention with this subclass, I feel it is the best way to adjust these features without overhauling the subclass.

My suggested changes will only be to Defensive Tactics, and Retaliation:

Defensive Tactics
At 7th level, When your favoured enemy makes an attack against any creature within 5 feet of you, including yourself, you can use your reaction to impose disadvantage on the attack roll.

This makes the feature a bit more versatile, and will overcome the tank fallacy as the disadvantage will apply to all creatures nearby, not just the Ranger.

At 15th level, you have learned to punish those who harm you with uncanny speed. If you use your Defensive Tactics feature and the attack hits the target, as part of the reaction you may make a melee attack against the attacking creature. If this attack hits, it deals an additional 2d8 damage of the weapon's damage type.

This again works to overcome the tank fallacy while still applying the same defensive advantages to the ranger. I removed the advantage granted by this feature, as I think the ability to use this on your allies as well as yourself is enough from the feature.

  • \$\begingroup\$ If my math is low value feel free to make some changes. \$\endgroup\$ – Jon Aristotle Apr 22 at 1:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is the answer I was looking for when I bountied it! Thanks \$\endgroup\$ – user68fd Apr 22 at 16:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.