# Does the Simic Hybrid's Manta Glide let them glide after a high jump to double their movement and avoid opportunity attacks?

The Simic Hybrid's Manta Glide feature (GGR p. 20) does the following:

You have ray-like fins that you can use as wings to slow your fall or allow you to glide. When you fall and aren't incapacitated, you can subtract up to 100 feet from the fall when calculating falling damage, and you can move up to 2 feet horizontally for every 1 foot you descend.

A Simic Hybrid with 14 strength can do a 2.5 feet standing high jump. Could the Simic Hybrid start gliding at the apex of their jump, moving 5 feet while effectively only spending 2.5 feet of movement to jump?

If so, they could continuously do standing high jumps of 2.5 feet to move 5 feet, effectively doubling their entire movement and letting them move 60 feet in a turn without dashing.

Additionally, the rule for opportunity attacks (PHB p. 195) states:

You also don't provoke an opportunity attack when you teleport or when someone or something moves you without using your movement, action, or reaction.

Does gliding after a high jump trigger opportunity attacks? The high jump uses your movement, but not the gliding part, so I'm unsure how it would work. If opportunity attacks are avoided, constant high jumps would let the Simic Hybrid double their movement and also avoid all opportunity attacks.

• Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 11:28
• Can answers (or the question) just assume a standing jump height of 3 feet? That way we don't have to worry about how 2.5 rounds. Also, I assume this is not on a grid as otherwise I fear a 3 foot high jump would be rounded to zero Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 11:32
• @Medix2 I don't see the issue with jumping 2.5 feet up in the air and gliding 5 feet, even on a grid. There is no mention of jump distances getting rounded down in the rules. But you are free to assume a starting jump height of 3 feet from a strength 16 Simic Hybrid if it makes it easier to provide an answer. In any case, a running high jump could let you jump 5 feet high and glide 10, which would add 5 feet of of movement and avoid OAs. Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 11:47
• I just mean that a 2.5-foot jump might round down to a 2-foot jump and thus only allow for 4 feet horizontally, which rounds to 0. Meanwhile, a 3-foot jump would just grant 6 feet of horizontal movement, rounding to 5 Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 11:49
• @GuillaumeF. The round down rule applies to everything unless the particular feature specifies that it doesn't: "Whenever you divide a number in the game, round down if you end up with a fraction, even if the fraction is one-half or greater." For example, the Aasimar's Radiant Consumption feature says: "at the end of each of your turns, you and each creature within 10 feet of you take radiant damage equal to half your level (rounded up)." Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 12:01

### Rules as written: Yeah, this seems to be the case.

The rules for High Jumps state:

When you make a high jump, you leap into the air a number of feet equal to 3 + your Strength modifier (minimum of 0 feet) if you move at least 10 feet on foot immediately before the jump. When you make a standing high jump, you can jump only half that distance.

When calculating your standing jump height, you have to factor in the "Round Down" rule from the introduction to the Player's Handbook:

Whenever you divide a number in the game, round down if you end up with a fraction, even if the fraction is one-half or greater.

So with a strength of 14, you have a modifier of +2, your standing jump height is 2 feet, so a 2 foot fall from the apex of your jump translates to 4 feet of lateral movement. Does this lateral movement also expend available movement? No. This feature is modifying how you fall, and since falling does not usually expend available movement, neither does falling in this particular way, since it does not specify that this particular change to falling now costs movement.

This works just fine if you are measuring distance to the foot, but it is unclear how this functions if you are playing on a fixed 5-foot grid. In this case, you will have to ask your DM.

### Rules as intended: This makes for a significantly overpowered feature, and the narrative image is ridiculous.

This, to me, seems to be a bug in the feature. If we take the feature to mean "double all your movement for free", then it is absolutely broken. It goes from being a good feature in a specific context, to being a blanket improvement in any context where movement is measured.

Further, it is even more powerful than if a feature just said "Your speed is doubled". A racial feature that said "your speed is doubled" would already be extremely powerful, but this feature is essentially that, with the fall protection.

Further, as written, it does prevent opportunity attacks: the part of the move where you leave the creature's reach isn't actually using your movement, which is sort of a cherry on top of an already broken feature. This simply cannot be the proper application of the feature, because that would make it far and away the most powerful feature in the game. Compare it to the Mobile feat:

• Your speed increases by 10 feet.
• When you use the Dash action, difficult terrain doesn't cost you extra movement on that turn.
• When you make a melee attack against a creature, you don't provoke opportunity attacks from that creature for the rest of the turn, whether you hit or not.

Mobile is generally regarded as a very good feat. Allowing Manta Glide to work as you have described makes it a vastly superior version of the Mobile feat.

Mobile increases your speed by 10 feet, Manta Glide doubles it. Mobile lets you cancel difficult terrain if you take the Dash action, Manta Glide lets you do it for free. Mobile lets you prevent opportunity attacks from a creature you attack, Manta Glide lets you prevent opportunity attacks from any creature for free.

There is no way this is the correct interpretation. Manta Glide should simply not be allowed to function this way.

Also, the mental image of a character jumping a bit then gliding a few feet as their primary locomotion pattern seems quite silly to me, but that's mostly an opinion of mine. Maybe you think that's cool. That's okay. The primary issue here is that this reading of the feature is so overwhelmingly powerful that it cannot be correct.

### Making Manta Glide cost 1 Reaction or limiting its use to "once per turn" mostly resolves these issues.

Darth Pseudonym pointed out in a comment:

So what I'm hearing is it could all be fixed by making Manta Glide a reaction.

This is exactly right. Giving it a reaction cost limits its use to once per turn, or if you want to do so without giving it a cost, just make it usable only once per turn. It still functions as intended, but can no longer be abused as described in the question.

And finally, as Mark Wells observed in a comment, this change would make the feature consistent with similar features that affect the rate of falling such as the spell feather fall which has a casting time of 1 Reaction, and the Monk's Slow Fall feature:

Beginning at 4th level, you can use your reaction when you fall to reduce any falling damage you take by an amount equal to five times your monk level.

I've gotten lots of helpful observations from users in the comments; this time Ryan C. Thompson pointed out that this may not resolve the "free disengage" issue. At a strength of 14, giving a 4 foot glide, this is not enough to leave a creature's 5 foot reach, the last foot to leave their reach will use movement and provoke an opportunity attack. However, at 16 strength, the glide is increased to 6 feet, which reintroduces the issue, but only if you have ruled that it is once per turn, but not if you have ruled that it costs a reaction. The rules for opportunity attacks state:

You also don't provoke an opportunity attack when you teleport or when someone or something moves you without using your movement, action, or reaction.

• It's the TTRPG equivalent of when a video game makes dodge-rolling faster than regular running, so players always dodge roll everywhere all the time. Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 12:29
• I think the term of art here is Bunny hopping, and the Simic should really have a more direct way to that end. Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 12:30
• There is also "Wavedash Tech", from Super Smash Bros Melee. Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 12:30
• @RyanC.Thompson It's reminiscent of that first trip to Castle Town from Kakariko village, rolling as fast as you can across Hyrule Field before night sets in. Commented Sep 1, 2021 at 12:31
• Is the "free disengage" still relevant if this uses your reaction? The OA rule implies that you do provoke an OA if you move using a reaction. Commented Sep 2, 2021 at 17:37

## RAW: Yes to movement, but opportunity attacks would still happen.

From GGR for Simic Hybrids:

You have ray-like fins that you can use as wings to slow your fall or allow you to glide. When you fall and aren't incapacitated, you can subtract up to 100 feet from the fall when calculating falling damage, and you can move up to 2 feet horizontally for every 1 foot you descend.

From Wikipedia entry on "Wingsuit flying"

A typical skydiver's terminal velocity in belly to earth orientation ranges from 180 to 225 km/h (110 to 140 mph). A wingsuit can reduce these speeds dramatically. A vertical instantaneous velocity of 40 km/h (25 mph) has been recorded. However the speed at which the body advances forward through the air is still much higher (up to 100 km/h [62 mph]).The glide ratios of older wingsuits made in the 1990s through the early 2010s were closer to 2:1[8].It was possible for expert flyers to achieve a 3:1 ratio[8] but this was very difficult.

Optional rule in XGE:

When you fall from a great height, you instantly descend up to 500 feet. If you’re still falling on your next turn, you descend up to 500 feet at the end of that turn. This process continues until the fall ends, either because you hit the ground or the fall is otherwise halted.

So if not altering the decent rate for change in drag, a character could dimension door up then glide 1000 ft. in a turn (and take 400 ft. of fall damage). It doesn't however say you get this movement without provoking opportunity attacks in combat.

PHB 5e p.195:

You also don't provoke an opportunity attack when you teleport or when someone or something moves you without using your movement, action, or reaction.

Normally when a a creature is falling it is being forcefully moved by gravity which is "something" and so that creature avoids opportunity attacks.

However, this feature has given you a new movement option where "you can move up to 2 feet horizontally for every 1 foot you descend." that you are not forced use since you get the fall damage reduction regardless. Clearly the "ray-like fins" are not "someone or something {which} moves you", it is a part of "you" as stated in the description which moves you horizontally.

Thus anyone choosing to jump then "move" with their "ray-like fins" rather, than falling straight down, would absolutely still provoke opportunity attacks.

Final side note of relevance:

If gaining elevation without any action/movement on your part (i.e. an ally teleports you upward or drags your limp body up a cliff); I'd say RAW and certainly RAI, you'd still take opportunity attacks if you choose to move horizontally during the fall. If we break the sentence up and fixate on only the "used no movement" part, an opportunity attack may not be granted in these pathologically cases.

However, Jeremy Crawford has tweeted replies to similar questions and has pointed that focusing on the entire "someone or something moves you ..." is correct and focusing only on "without using your movement, action, or reaction." is not correct in his mind.

Link to Jeremy Crawford's ruling here:

"If a spell forces you to move, as dissonant whispers does, you're not moving of your own volition."

Dissonant Whispers PHB:

The target must make a Wisdom saving throw. On a failed save, it takes 3d6 psychic damage and must immediately use its reaction, if available, to move as far as its speed allows away from you.

Hence, I suspect he would rule similarly (although I understand why people get confused, and feel bad that he has to keep saying it in tweets).