Deadly Aim is very similar to Power Attack in PF1, in that it reduces your chance to hit in exchange for some extra damage. In PF2 however the enemies' AC increases together with your attacks, so -2 penalty seems really big against +4 damage, espcecially for an 8th level class feat.

Is it a simple damage increase, circumstantial, or a trap?

Is there some specific build this is very good (or bad) for (bow/crossbow, precision/flurry)?

Boundary conditions:

  • we try to maximize DPR
  • the Ranger starts with 18 in Dex, and incrases it at every possibility
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Worth it compared to what? What character build are you intending to use this with? I think we need some more details here to put the feat into context so that you can get answers focused on your particular use case for the feat. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 12:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ So you're just asking if taking the feat is a net negative compared to just not taking it (and not taking anything else)? \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 12:39
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ And is there a particular character build you're using this with? \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 12:40
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't understand the scope of your question, so I voted to close it. There seem to be at least 4 different answers to this that are equally correct, and I have no idea what your problem is. The right answer is maximised DPR at epic play? Or is it under what circumstances should one take it when playing a ranger that wants to maximise DPR at every level? Is it generally an option that does one any good or completely bad when compared to all other options? Or does it even make your character worse when compared to not taking it? And there are more there that one could cover. \$\endgroup\$
    – Akixkisu
    Sep 24, 2021 at 14:06
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I think the question (to me) seems pretty clear. "When is Deadly Aim worth using?" It's similar to any Power Attack or Great Weapon Master question that can be answered by a formula (unfortunately my search abilities are letting me down here, but I use a formula in my 5e game to determine when to GWM that I'm pretty sure I pulled from this site). \$\endgroup\$
    – ESCE
    Sep 24, 2021 at 20:25

3 Answers 3


It's (sorta) a trap!

I've run the numbers for a Ranger vs at level Moderate, High, and Extreme ACs. I don't have a magic formula for you (I'm not so good at that, and Medix2's answer is way better than I could do there), but I do have magic graphs!

The TL;DR: Deadly Aim is basically only worth it for non-Precision rangers when fighting against extreme AC targets. This means if gives you decent damage increases against bosses as well (i.e. higher level enemies).

Chart Assumptions

Each chart looks at four types of rangers. A ranger doing a normal attack, a ranger doing a deadly aim attack, and then both of those again, but factoring in Precision Edge. The Precision Edge stuff is actually a little misleading, because you have two more actions to apply that! Maybe follow up with Hunter's Aim or something. All of these consider a ranger using a composite shortbow and automatic bonus progression. Every time we get a +1 potency bump, I add another d6 damage, assuming that you add another damage rune to your weapon (e.g. Flaming, Frost, Shocking, etc.). This ranger also starts with 16 strength, but has 18 by the time they reach level 8, meaning they'll get +2 from Propulsive for the rest of their career.

Chart 1 - vs Moderate AC

EDITED Deadly Aim is not worth it, but only barely. It does start out as roughly equal (for levels 8 and 9 it technically does 0.05 more expected damage on the non-Precision ranger, but then never catches up).

Expected Average Damage vs On-Level Moderate AC

Chart 2 -- vs High AC

Deadly aim is actually rarely better here, and usually is equal. If you can get your enemy flat-footed (or grab a bonus to hit), then it's probably going to look more like the Moderate AC chart. Without those, Deadly Aim is a trap.

Expected Average Damage vs On-Level High AC

Chart 3 -- vs Extreme AC

Deadly aim gets to be the same or better than normal for all levels for a normal ranger. The Precision ranger finally sees Deadly Aim being okay. Extreme AC corresponds roughly to a High AC of two levels higher, so this is probably the chart to look at for boss enemies.

Expected Average Damage vs On-Level Extreme AC


EDITED Deadly Aim seems to be useful in situations where aiming, IRL, would be useful; when targets are harder to hit. I would use this less when you have bonuses to hit (somewhat intuitively), because those bonuses are likely to increase your crit range. But when you are only going to crit on a natural 20, it seems that Deadly Aim may actually be your friend. Indeed, that is the commonality behind all the places where Deadly Aim is useful for a high DC (on a normal ranger). The Precision Ranger has a higher base damage, which in turn makes Deadly Aim less worth it; if we extrapolate from that, Deadly Aim would be even more worth it when you have lower base damage (e.g. non-composite Shortbow, non-applicable damage runes (or non-damaging runes) on your weapon) or when you don't benefit as much from critting (i.e. you are using a Daikyu).

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Started to wonder why you said level 8 for 16 Str instead of 5 or 10... then remembered it's an 8th level Feat \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 23:00
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It might be worth going back into the data to find the actual To Hit vs AC breakpoints; I'm assuming that they sit somewhere around AC minus Chance-to-hit = 10, (or, to put it another way, when the -2 penalty takes you from a 15 or 10% chance to crit to a 5% chance to crit; the curve presumably straightens out somewhat after that point) \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 23:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @LessPop_MoreFizz that's a good ask... led me to discover an error in the formula :( updating post. (levels 13 and 17 are, for reference, both levels in which Deadly Aim increases the crit chance by 10% against high AC, which probably explains the wide gulf) \$\endgroup\$
    – ESCE
    Sep 25, 2021 at 0:23
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ So if Deadly Aim is rarely better than not using it, and even then only barely, it seems to be a waste of an 8th level feat. \$\endgroup\$
    – András
    Sep 25, 2021 at 7:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It depends a lot on what your priorities are. If you want to improve your damage against targets with high AC, it’s pretty good. (It’s also, though not shown in the above charts, extremely good for maximizing damage against targets with very low AC, should you have such a need for some reason). It’s also stronger than the above charts show against targets that are immune to critical hits, or when using weapons without the Deadly trait. It doesn’t fit into a fully optimized build, but it’s not so bad as to be a straight trap if you’re building for specific weapons, targets, or circumstances. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 25, 2021 at 14:48

Whether you want to use Deadly Aim depends upon the percent chance that you hit and your average damage when you do hit

Note: this answer ignores the mechanics of critical hits1

Let \$h\$ = Percent chance to hit before Deadly Aim
Let \$h_{Aim}\$ = Percent chance to hit after Deadly Aim
Let \$D\$ = Increase in damage $$\text{Maximum Average Damage} = \frac{h_{Aim} \times D}{h - h_{Aim}}$$

Here "Maximum Average Damage" is the maximum value the average damage of a regular attack can have where taking a trade-off (like Deadly Aim) is still worth it.3

We can apply this general formula to the specific case of Deadly Aim using the fact that \$h_{Aim} = h - \frac{2}{20}\$ and \$D = 4\$:

$$\frac{(h - \frac{2}{20})\times 4}{h - (h - \frac{2}{20})} =$$ $$\frac{4h - \frac{8}{20}}{\frac{2}{20}} =$$ $$40h - 4$$

Thus, when the average damage of a hit before applying Deadly Aim is less than \$40h - 4\$, you would want to use Deadly Aim. To explain this in more detail:

  1. Calculate the chance that a regular attack (without using Deadly Aim) would hit: this gets you the value for \$h\$.
  2. Calculate the average damage your would deal on a hit (without using Deadly Aim); this is going to be the average damage that you would deal so it will typically amount to just adding all flat modifiers and then the average of all the dice you would roll.
  3. Calculate \$40h - 4\$ and compare this with your average damage from step 2. If the damage you calculated in step 2 is less than \$40h - 4\$, you should use Deadly Aim.

Examples of using the formula:

Say your attack before applying Deadly Aim has a 50% chance of hitting; using our formula we get:

Max = \$40(.5) - 4 = 16\$
If our average damage before applying Deadly Aim is less than 16, we would want to use Deadly Aim because it will increase our average damage output.

Say we had a 25% chance of hitting:

Max = \$40(.25) - 4 = 6\$
In this case, if our average damage is less than 6, we would want to use Deadly Aim.

A table of values

Hit Chance Maximum Damage
5% Infinite
10% ???2
15% 2
20% 4
25% 6
30% 8
35% 10
40% 12
45% 14
50% 16
55% 18
60% 20
65% 22
70% 24
75% 26
80% 28
85% 30
90% 32
95% (2+) 34
95% ("1"+) 36
95% ("0"+) Infinite

It is worth noting though that this formula doesn't apply to all hit chances: It only applies if the minimum number you would need on the die for a hit before applying Deadly Aim is between 1 and 18.

To explain this, imagine you could somehow roll a 0 on the die and even that would hit. In this case, taking a -2 penalty to the attack roll will always improve your damage since you would effectively change your minimum roll on the die for a hit to a 2, which was the case originally anyways.

For the case of hitting when rolling a 19+ on the die, taking a -2 penalty means you would need to roll a 21 or higher (so you would need to roll a 20); and for the case where you need a crit in order to hit originally, taking a penalty to your hit chance won't change that and will always be the better option. Basically, this formula doesn't account for the changes experienced at the extreme ends which is why the 10% field has "???" in the chart.2 That said, I can't imagine having a 5, 10, or 95 percent chance to hit comes up very often.

1 If we account for only the crits that result from rolling a 20, the maximum damage of every part of the chart increases by 2 except for the case where you have a 10% chance of hitting where instead the maximum damage increases to 8.

2 Manually calculating the 10% hit chance case gets us a maximum damage of 2.

3 A proof of the formula used at the start:

Let \$h\$ = Percent chance to hit before Deadly Aim
Let \$h_{Aim}\$ = Percent chance to hit after Deadly Aim
Let \$D\$ = Increase in damage from Deadly Aim
Let \$A\$ = Average damage before Deadly Aim

We can look at the following equation:

$$h_{aim}(A + D) - h(A)$$

This would be the expected damage when using Deadly Aim (the hit chance times the average damage) minus the expected damage when not using Deadly Aim (the hit chance times the average damage). Thus, whenever this function is positive, that is, when Deadly Aim deals more damage than not using Deadly Aim, we want to use Deadly Aim. In particular, because this function is always decreasing, when this equation equals zero, we have reached the maximum average damage where would want to use Deadly Aim. (The function is always decreasing because the derivative with respect to \$A\$ is \$h_{aim} - h\$ which is always non-positive (negative or zero) as \$h \ge h_{aim}\$). Thus we have a new equation that we can manipulate:

$$h_{aim}(A + D) - h(A) = 0$$ $$A(h_{aim}) + h_{aim}(D) - A(h) = 0$$ $$A(h_{aim} - h) = -h_{aim}\times D$$ $$A = \frac{-h_{aim}\times D}{h_{aim} - h}$$ $$A = \frac{h_{aim}\times D}{h - h_{aim}}$$

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Crits are a big part of the game, you seem to completely ignore them \$\endgroup\$
    – András
    Sep 24, 2021 at 14:28
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ @András They don't change anything about the calculations though? Oh wait, the exceed by 10 rule, hmmm \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 14:28
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Adding crits shouldn't be too hard (he says while watching from the sidelines), just add the same equation again with the chance to crit instead of chance to hit. The one caveat is the chance to crit is never less than 5%, and that needs to apply to both H and H(aim). \$\endgroup\$
    – WeirdFrog
    Sep 24, 2021 at 15:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure I understand what the phrase "maximum expected damage" means in this case. Is it the max damage you could do times the probability of hitting, or something else? And either way, I'm not sure why it is equal to the equation you provided (particularly the part where you divide by the difference in probabilities to hit). I think maybe there are some (valid) assumptions going on here, but I can't see them clearly in this explanation. Could you maybe explain where the initial equation comes from? \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 16:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ That rewording is very helpful! That already helps me see where the equation comes from. Thanks for adding it to the answer. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 24, 2021 at 17:04

It is a clear trap for Crossbow users, and bad most of the time for Bow users as well

The difference comes from Crossbow Ace1. Both it and Deadly Aim provide circumstance bonuses, so for Crossbows the attack penalty is the same, while the damage increase is smaller.


You use the optimal weapons and runes, and increase the relevant abilities at every occasion.

The damage increase in percentage from Deadly Aim varies from level to level, because either the base damage changes, or the increase the feat provides:

  • You get the feat on level 8
  • Level 10: you get the second property rune, best spent on a second element
  • Level 10: if you use a bow, propulsive likely reaches +2
  • Level 11: its bonus increases to +6
  • Level 12: you get Greater Striking
  • Level 13: you get master specialization to damage
  • Level 15: its bonus increases to +8
  • Level 16: you get the second property rune, best spent on a second element
  • Level 19: you get Major Striking


Unfortunately the name of this specific weapon2 is the same as the name of the category.

The biggest increase from the feat with a Crossbow comes at level 15, it is 12,33%. If you consider criticals too, even with 95% hit chance the attack without Deadly Aim does more damage.

Composite Shortbow

This seems to be considered the best bow on the forums3.

Again the biggest increase from the feat comes at level 15, it is 32,65%. If you consider criticals too, you need a 75% hit chance for Deadly Aim to do more damage (by 1%, not what you expect from an 8th level feat). You need 85% hit chance for a 6% increase in DPR, this means you hit on a 4, very unlikely.

Other Considerations

Precision Ranger

The precision bonus increases the base damage, so the ratio of the increase is even smaller. Consequently, Deadly Aim is even further behind.

No elemental damage from the property runes

If the enemy is resistant/immune to one of the runes, or you picked another rune4, the hit chance where Deadly Aim breaks even decreases somewhat, but rarely in the likely territory.

  1. As Crossbows are not competitive with Bows at all without it, I assume the Crossbow Ranger took it
  2. Ranged characters usually do not need empty hands, so Hand Crossbow provides little benefit, and Heavy Crossbows have horrible DPR because of the Reload 2
  3. Without a multiclass and Point-Blank Shot, a Longbow's Volley trait can be crippling (especially when added to the -2 penalty from Deadly Aim). You cannot always get further away, for example in cities or dungeons
  4. Not a good idea if you go for DPR

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .