In the process of promoting silly party feats and a cantrip to support one of those feats, I designed:

Shoot Confetti
cantrip, conjuration
Range: 30 ft
Casting time: 1 action
Duration: Instantaneous
Components: S, V
Class: Bard, Warlock, Wizard

You point one of your fingers in a direction away from you. A stream of confetti bursts forth to a point within 30' of you, lightly obscuring a volume no larger than a 5' cube for 1d4 rounds. You can have two of these effects present at any one time.

The confetti is flammable: mundane fire (torches, matches, burning tapers, candles, etc) and spells such as fire bolt that set fire to flammable materials burn the confetti away and in so doing cause 1d4 fire damage. This fire damage is increased to 2d4 at 5th level, 3d4 at 11th level, and 4d4 at 17th level.

Like vicious mockery, it has two different effects, but it isn't a powerful damage dealer. In order to do damage, either the bard or the ally must take a subsequent action. The opportunity for accidental damage is certainly present.

Is this cantrip within the bound/constraints of cantrips in the PHB?
If not, what adjustment needs to be made to bring it into balance?


  1. The chosen volume is similar in size to minor illusion and shape water cantrips.
  2. The "something else catches it on fire" is similar to what happens to a web when a fire bolt, flaming sphere, or a fireball hits the webbed area.
  3. I was considering making this a bonus action cantrip, but I got the idea that an exploit like shoot confetti/firebolt as bonus action/action would be a 'too powerful' exploit and chose '1 action' instead.
  4. If I can get this cantrip right, I'll be adding it to the Wild Beyond the Witchlight adventure.
  5. I am not sure if the name wholly captures the cantrip; if a recommendation for a new name like "confetti cloud" or something else comes to mind when offering an answer, a better name would be appreciated but is not necessary to answering the balance question.
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Must the fire come second? If I aim this at someone holding a lit torch, are they automatically eating some fire damage? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 18:10
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @StopBeingEvil That's a good question, at the moment that answer seems to be yes to your question. (And now the evil clown hides in the corner and waits for a torch bearing adventurer to enter the dark theater, confetti fire happens ... yeah, they eat fire damage as written, so Molot's point about including a save is a good one; the general argument for a save like for vicious mockery or sacred flame becomes stronger). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 18:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thematically, you might consider having it not increase in damage with level, but rather increase the area (2, 3, or 4 contiguous 5' cubes, perhaps?) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 21:16
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You could use "Party Popper" as a name, because that's totally what an Artificer would use if they got their hands on this spell. \$\endgroup\$
    – Erik
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 17:58
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Combine this spell with a cape of the mountebank that makes a cloud of confetti instead of brimstone smoke \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 1, 2021 at 19:14

3 Answers 3


Clearly overpowered

Character can cast it with one hand while keeping a torch in front of him with the other. Guaranteed damage without attack roll and save is too much.

either the bard or the ally must take a subsequent action

That is not consistent with how the cantrip is written now. Fire just lights it up so there is no need to take an action. If not played on the grid, all is needed is a bit of movement that will take the flame of a torch in contact with the confetti.

In a way, it is even more powerful than the Web spell. Burning Web only damages creatures that starts their turn in it. Allies can still pull the creature out before it gets hurt. There is no defense against burning confetti at all.

If you want to model it after Web, make it burn away in one round and only damage creatures that starts their turn in the fire. Still, this is mechanics designed for 2nd level spell. I believe that a more mundane Dexterity saving throw would be more appropriate for a cantrip.

The fact that is only a 1d4 does not compensate well. If chance to save is about half, then Thunderclap's 1d6 damage is worth on average 1.75, and confetti's 1d4 is worth on average 2.5 damage. Clear win for Confetti - and Confetti, in addition to being superior damage dealer, has added flexibility.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. Feel free to continue it in there :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Someone_Evil
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 11:18

This is likely very weak and has some unusual decisions

Light Obscurement is rarely useful

The shoot confetti spell causes a single 5x5 cube to become lightly obscured and we know the following from the rules on Vision and Light:

[...] In a lightly obscured area [...] creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight. [...]

For an extreme majority of cases, this simply won't be a factor; creatures can leave the space easily given its size and creatures rarely make Perception checks which would have to happen at exactly that moment while in that space.

The duration (1d4 rounds) is unusual

Additionally, the area lasts for 1d4 rounds; this is, as far as I know, unheard of in a cantrip or other spells. I can't imagine increasing the duration to 1 minute, or even 1 hour, would have any negative effects and it would, if anything, make the weak cantrip stronger.

The damage is unreliable, automatic, and despite that, is outpaced by other cantrips

Damaging with this cantrip requires the creature not to leave the area before you are able to use fire to cause the automatic 1d4 damage. We can actually directly compare the damage output to fire-bolt (H is hit chance, C is crit chance):

1d4 vs 1d10 (H) + 2d10 (C)
2.5 vs 5.5H + 11(0.05)
2.5 vs 5.5H + .55
1.95 vs 5.5H
0.35 vs H

So if you can hit on a die roll of 13, fire-bolt is the better choice. If we do out the math for other levels, this die roll requirement stays the same. So shoot confetti is almost always worse than fire-bolt (which also has quadruple the range). And this doesn't even account for the fact that the expected damage of shoot confetti actually is not 1d4; it's 1d4 times the chance you actually damage somebody, which is certainly less than 100%.

The torch/fire interaction/requirement is unclear

It's unclear to me how this works: Can a creature just walk up to the confetti while holding a torch and it combusts? Does the torch need to be thrown? Does igniting it with a hand-held torch cause the torch bearer to take the damage as well? Can a fire-bolt merely travel through the confetti or must it hit something in it?

Putting it all together

The light obscurement is rarely useful, the damage is almost always worse than just using fire-bolt, it has a few oddities (1d4 round duration and automatic, save-free damage), and how exactly the confetti combustion works is under-defined/unclear. Overall I would call this cantrip very weak.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Would it be better off with no duration? A variety of cantrips have durations (shape water being one such, but that's from Xanathar's). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 15:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast With the imobility of the area and the fact that only two can exist at once, I honestly can't imagine there'd be any difference between giving it a 1 minute, 1 hour, or "until dispelled" duration \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 15:02
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ One minute is consistent with some other spells/cantrips, and avoids a die roll. Less clunky. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Exempt-Medic Noting the name change and reasonably sure that I refer to your old name in third person in some of my own comments and answers. Do you prefer I edit these to reflect the change as I come across them? \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 15:10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Kirt Well, you can't edit comments once 5 minutes have passed so I'm not sure how you'd do that, but either way, nah, there's no need; they're perfectly fine left as-is \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 15:11

Much depends on the application of "burns the confetti away".

It would be overpowered to have a torch in one hand, cast the cantrip with the other, and have a 30' long, 5' wide ray of fire damage with no save and no hit roll. However, my reading of the spell would indicate that in this situation, the stream of confetti would ignite in the square of the torch holder (caster), damage them, and then be burned away by the time it hit the target square, for no damage to the target but perhaps a gust of hot wind. This reading would not be overpowered. It does mean that casting the spell could take advantage of someone else holding or standing next to a flame source, but since such targets of opportunity are situational, I do not consider that overpowered.

Similarly, you could target a square within 30 feet, start the confetti cloud, and then 'walk over and ignite it' with no save and no hit roll. But this is analogous to walking over, pouring out (not throwing) an oil flask, and then igniting it for automatic damage without a hit roll or save. You can do that, but the risk to a caster of voluntarily putting themselves within an opponent's reach balances out the 'automatic' damage, which is low. This is also not overpowered. And since this burns away the confetti, my reading is that it would end the duration of the spell if it had turns remaining.

Lightly obscured can have interesting interactions

Such a small area of effect means that it will be little use in partially blinding an opponent; they can just leave the area. But it could see use in obscuring an object, oneself, or an ally. Suppose you, a clown-fairy, have the party trapped inside your circus wagon with the only way out a secret door. Your ally, a rat-fairy, is currently Hidden and moving in to Sneak Attack one of them. On your turn you ready an action to cast your cantrip.

Your ally steps on a squeaky floorboard, threatening to give himself away (low Stealth roll)? Shoot the confetti at his target, dropping their Passive Perception by 5 from disadvantage and maybe preserving your ally's Hide.

The party starts to Investigate the wall of the wagon, looking for the secret door before you are done monologuing? Shoot the confetti at the wall to disadvantage their Investigation roll while you say, "It's not over there!"

The party tries to make an Insight on you to see how seriously to take your monologue? Confetti yourself to disadvantage their Insight.

Also, wild elves get 'mask of the wild' that allows them to hide when lightly obscured by natural conditions. As a DM, give 'mask of the wild beyond the witchlight' to all your clown-fairies, so they can confetti themselves before Hiding, as the equivalent of a ninja smoke-bomb. Poof! you're gone!

  • \$\begingroup\$ You can't know this, but as I tossed this one over to GiTP for review, "lasts until the end of your next turn" is less clunky as a duration, and "starts their turn in cloud" is the only way they get damage. Burns away means what it means in plain English. Trying to pick the fly poop out of the pepper on that one is a lost cause. "Write it the way other spells are written" issues will be in the next version. I'll give it a day or two before, per our Best Practices on homebrew review questions. Thanks for the feedback. Your point on Mask of the Wild was on my mind as I wrote it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 19:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast But what does 'burns away' mean in a mechanics (not plain English) sense - does it create a thirty-foot long stream of burning confetti, or does it burn the confetti in the same square as the torch, and after that there is no confetti and no fire. That's what I was trying to get it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Commented Oct 27, 2021 at 20:21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Another interesting side effect: Say you're lost in a cave, looking for the exit. You could cast confetti, and watch which way the wind blows it to direct you towards the exit. Would work outdoors as well - your archer friend needs to make a long shot and needs to know which way the wind is blowing - cue confetti. (In both cases, you'd aim it straight up so that the information isn't obscured by it starting in a given direction.) This might also make a useful signal flare to help allies find you in the woods or something. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 14:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .