If a character who has a familiar dies and is then raised via raise dead or even reincarnation, is the familiar still bound to that character or is that bond broken at character death?

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Same question for Pathfinder. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 12, 2021 at 16:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ I suspect that this question has no answer. What standard of evidence would you want from an answer that claims that there is no official answer to this? \$\endgroup\$
    – J. Mini
    Dec 12, 2021 at 18:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well I know what happens if the familiar would have died were it not a familiar, but that's just the obvious portion of the whole thing... \$\endgroup\$
    – Zachiel
    Dec 12, 2021 at 19:16

2 Answers 2


Death of a Master

If a master dies and the familiar survives, part of the master lives on in the familiar. It loses any extra hit points and skills it gained from the master but retains most of its familiar abilities. It is treated as having a master two levels lower (but never below 1st level). If the master is later brought back from the dead, the bond is reestablished, and the familiar gains whatever abilities go along with the master’s new level.

---Tome and Blood, page 12

Although published before the Dungeons and Dragons 3.5 Revision, anything not republished from Tome and Blood is still a source for Dungeons and Dragons 3.5 information according to Why a Revision? (DMG (2003), p. 4)

As long as that section of Tome and Blood is not reprinted or superseded by newer material, it still pertains to the rules at large.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for relevance, but this answer would be improved by an explicitly mention of how Tome and Blood is a third edition sourcebook, rather than a 3.5rd edition one. \$\endgroup\$
    – GMJoe
    Dec 13, 2021 at 20:37

Nothing in 3.5rd edition's rules suggests that the bond between a familiar and its master is broken by the master's death.

In fact, there seem to be no rules at all for what happens to a familiar when the master dies. Granted, it's hard to prove a negative, but in this case it's easy to check the parts of the rulebooks where we might expect to find such rules:

The "Familiar" class feature description on page 54 of the Player's Handbook doesn't specify that anything in particular happens when the master dies. Given that this section does describe in detail what happens when the familiar dies, this is where I'd expect to find any special rules for the master's death - and there aren't any.

The "FAMILIARS" sidebar (Bottombar?), on pages 52 and 53 of the Player's Handbook, also doesn't specify that anything in particular happens to a familiar when its master dies. This would be my second guess as to where to find information about what happens to a familiar when its master dies, as it's the single biggest section of the rules that deals with familiars. No such information is present.

3.5rd edition doesn't actually define the effects of death anywhere, presumably its authors assumed players would be able to guess. As such, there's nothing in the non-existent rules for death that describe what happens to bound familiars.

The rules for bringing back the dead on page 171 of the Player's Handbook contain no mention of familiars.

In the absence of a rule describing for what happens in a specific situation, it's generally safest to assume that real-world common sense applies; or if the situation is one with no real-world precedent, that the status quo is maintained. This is why we assume that spells don't end upon the caster's death, and that magic items don't cease to be magical when the spellcaster dies. Accordingly, we must conclude that, like Hachikō, a familiar remains bound to its master even after that master's soul departs for the outer planes through the nearest astral conduit.

Technically-unrelated bonus rule: The homunculous, listed on page 154 of the monster manual, isn't a familiar. However, it acts a lot like a familiar, and can fulfil most of the same roles. Its monster manual entry specifies that it dies and melts into a pool of ichor if its master is slain, which is disgusting, but thankfully not the norm for familiars.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Cf. The section Death of a Master from the Rules of the Game Web column "All About Familiars (Part Four)". Yeah, the columns are sketchy, but it may be better than nothing. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 13, 2021 at 2:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .