7
\$\begingroup\$

Can summon spells be used to summon the same specific creatures repeatedly?

I see that RAW wise it is actually allowed to let a PC repeatly summons the same creature over and over again.

If a PC decides to do so and they do it so much that they almost re-summon the same creature in every single battle (and maybe develop some kinds of relationship with that creature), can a DM count this creature as a sort of cohort of this PC and starts gaining exp and even class level during the adventure? (Given that the PC accepts the downside that their own exp could be reduced because of this)

\$\endgroup\$
0

1 Answer 1

9
\$\begingroup\$

As written, no.

The variant rule does not include progression.

As the other answer didn't quote the whole section, I'm not going to either, but it doesn't mention progression. It mentions rolling for stats and how to give them equipment, but there's no mention of them gaining experience or accruing class levels. While it doesn't explicitly say they can't gain experience, it also doesn't explicitly say they can. My reading is that, by default, even with the variant rule, they would not progress.

Houserules are, naturally, possible.

The DM could, of course, houserule that a repeatedly-summoned creature soaks up experience like a cohort or additional party member would, but that's in houserule territory beyond the scope of this variant rule. The loss of experience would be more detrimental than for a typical cohort as cohorts are able to always be present, putting their soaked exp to constant use, while summoned creatures are limited by spell slots. In exchange, you would have disproportionately powerful summon spells, as e.g. Summon Monster II could eventually summon a Celestial Eagle Fighter 5 instead of the typical CR 1/2 Celestial Eagle.

It's worth noting that the variant rule says "it entails some special problems, so don't allow [this] without considering it carefully." Allowing progression on top of the variant rule exacerbates most of the problems, and I personally wouldn't allow it barring a very specific situation.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .