The new Cartomancer feat from The Book of Many Things states that "You can use a card deck as your spellcasting focus." It also states that you can "imbue" a spell "into a card," after which you can "flourish the card and cast the spell within."

If a Cartomancer has donned a shield in their left hand, and is using their card deck as a spellcasting focus in their right hand, can they use the same hand to flourish the card within that deck into which they have imbued a spell?


1 Answer 1


For (*,S,M) spells yes, for (*,S) spells, no.

If the spell has a material and somatic component, (*,S,M), this works, as the rules for material components state:

A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell’s material components — or to hold a spellcasting focus — but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.

So the hand holding the deck, the spellcasting focus, can meet both the material and somatic component. However, if the spell has (*,S) components with no material component, this does not work, since the rules for somatic components state:

Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a somatic component, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.

Since the hand holding the deck is not being used to meet a material component, it cannot be used to meet the somatic component for a (*,S) spell.

And finally, the question of "can you actually flourish the card from the deck one handed?" There's nothing in the rules that would restrict this, I typically deal cards one-handed, and I've seen card artists do absolutely magnificent things with a deck of cards one-handed. I really just don't see a reason why this would be a problem.

"*" here indicates that the presence or absence of a V (Verbal) component is irrelevant.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ This answer addresses the material component rules re: arcane foci, but not the question of whether one can "flourish" a card with a hand that's busy using an arcane focus. (Or the potential interpretation of the question as whether the card can be part of the deck being used as a focus.) EDIT: Your edit does address that. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – Kerrick
    Nov 2, 2023 at 16:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ To explain my downvote, any answer that talks about SM being ok but not S without referencing what a stupid rule it is will always get a downvote. Experts can do so much better than just quote some rules text. \$\endgroup\$
    – SeriousBri
    Nov 2, 2023 at 17:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SeriousBri I don't think it's a stupid rule, I think it makes perfect sense. For (S,M), the somatic component is handling the material component. For (S), the somatic component is some magical finger wagging that can't be done with stuff in your hand. So no, I'm not just thoughtlessly regurgitating rules text. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 2, 2023 at 17:11
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @seriousbri We’re downvoting correct answers because that’s not how we’d rule? That seems…odd. \$\endgroup\$
    – NotArch
    Nov 2, 2023 at 17:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ If you want to see what people can do with a single hand and a deck of cards, "cardistry" is a good term to google. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 2, 2023 at 19:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .