Cloak of Flies is an eldritch invocation for warlocks that does the following (irrelevant parts snipped):

As a bonus action, you can surround yourself with a magical aura that looks like buzzing flies. The aura extends 5 feet from you in every direction, [...]. It lasts until you’re incapacitated or you dismiss it as a bonus action.

[...] Any other creature that starts its turn in the aura takes poison damage equal to your Charisma modifier (minimum of 0 damage).

The Invisibility spell description states:

A creature you touch becomes invisible until the spell ends. Anything the target is wearing or carrying is invisible as long as it is on the target's person. The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.

Cloak of Flies is not a spell, so it should be possible to activate it even while Invisible. So then the result should be a 15-foot-diameter buzzing poison murder ball of magical flies, which does automatic damage, without attacking or casting a spell.

  1. Does the combination work directly as one would expect? Or are there any gotchas which would break either the Invisibility or the Cloak of Flies effect, or just somehow prevent them from working together?

  2. What happens if the Warlock uses the Hide action? Is it still with with advantage even with the Cloak of Flies, as the Warlock is invisible? Does being hidden and not just invisible change anything in this situation, since the flies are visible anyway? Or is Dodge a better action in every way, because even if concentration drops, the Dodge effect remains?

  • \$\begingroup\$ "as the Warlock is invisible", dang, that does not give advantage to hide, just makes it possible. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 1 at 19:11

2 Answers 2


First off, just to clarify some rules, being invisible does not give you advantage on hide checks RAW.

For the purpose of hiding, the creature is heavily obscured. (PHB, p. 291)

You can still know a creatures location without being able to see them because they still make sound and leave foot prints.

Question 1:

There are no gotchas in the rules here. Cloak of Flies is not a spell or attack, nor does the feature mention any specific interaction with hiding or invisibility. Obviously, this aura is not your person nor any clothes or worn/carried equipment, so the spell does not cause the flies to be invisible.

What will likely happen is the DM will allow you to do what you can as per the rules, but anyone looking for you will probably have a bonus to finding you given you are surrounded by buzzing flies.

Your 2nd question(s):

What happens if the Warlock uses Hide action?

  • Nothing out of ordinary, hide as you were "heavily obscured" per the invisible condition.

Is it still with with advantage even with the Cloak of Flies, as the Warlock is invisible?

  • Never had advantage in the first place.

Does being hidden and not just invisible change anything in this situation, since the flies are visible anyway.

  • Probably not. RAW, cloak of flies and invisible don't react, but a cloud of buzzing flies will certainly raise some eyebrows.

Or is Dodge a better action in every way, because even if concentration drops, Dodge effect remains?

  • In every way? No, dodging vs. invisible each have their own merits and the better one depends on the situation.
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you imagine/describe a scenario where being hidden inside the aura would be better than Dodge Action just in case? I can imagine one scenario: pretend it is just a cloud of flies, so enemy does not even think to attack the Warlock, and that depends on DM playing along. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 2 at 10:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I can come up with a million scenarios that might be what you're looking for. It would be easier if you had a scenario and course of action you wanted to complete, then I could give you my answer. But that would largely be opinion based which is off topic on this site. Not to mention questions and answers in comments are largely forbidden. \$\endgroup\$
    – Shadomew
    Commented Feb 2 at 13:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ I meant, editing the answer with an example where being hidden instead of just invisible at the center of the cloud provides a RAW objective advantage. If there is indeed anything, beyond nebulous "others might be fooled to think you are not there, at DM discretion". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 2 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ One example is that many spells require "a target you can see", so an invisible warlock can't even be targeted by many things, let alone hit. I would also say that it isn't raw to get advantage to hide while invisible, but if that doesn't confer situational advantage I don't know what would. \$\endgroup\$
    – SeriousBri
    Commented Feb 6 at 7:41

Does the combination work as one would expect?

Yes. In your case, the primary benefit of invisibility is:

Attack rolls against the creature have disadvantage

The cloak of flies will not impede this.

Another benefit of being invisible is usually that:

For the purpose of hiding, the creature is heavily obscured.

The reason that being heavily obscured helps in Hiding, is that

You can't hide from a creature that can see you clearly

and being heavily obscured prevents you from being seen, so that you can make your Hide attempt even while you are in line of sight.

What happens if you use the Hide action?

You can certainly Hide, but you are a surrounded by a cloud of flies which isn't Hidden. You are neither wearing nor carrying these flies, so they are still quite visible1.

What are the advantages of Hiding?

Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.

You are surrounded by a cloud of flies fifteen feet wide - are you realistically going to be able to do any of these things? About the only thing you might be able to do while hidden is move without being heard1, even though your position will still be noted by anyone who can see. In your case, your attempt to Hide could be used to resolve your attempt to move silently when surrounded by the obvious cloud of flies.

If you are unseen, and your attempt at Hiding means you are not making noise, it is possible that your attackers will have to guess your location - and if they guess wrong, their attacks will automatically miss. Tempting as that is, it quite depends on the intelligence of your opponents and how much prior experience they have had with magic.

Unintelligent opponents will likely treat the cloud of flies as a natural cloud of flies, without suspecting that you are even inside (although they might smell you, and conclude that you are in fact what the flies are being attracted to). Intelligent opponents with little experience of magic will likely recognize the perfectly-spherical cloud of flies as being controlled or directed but won't necessarily guess its source.

Intelligent opponents who have been exposed to standard magical effects, however, will likely suspect that not only is someone controlling the cloud, but that you are at its exact center - negating the advantage of Hiding to eliminate your sound. While they might not be familiar with this specific warlock invocation, as @Shadowmew says "Magical effects that obscure sight or other senses are not rare on the battlefield and can be a good indication that an enemy is nearby". And most such effects are centered on the caster - insect swarm, a portable darkness, spiritual guardians, a marine layer, etc. Other obscuring effects that are not centered on the caster (eg., fog cloud, cloud kill) tend to move with the wind. If there is a perfectly spherical obscured area that moves at a walking speed irrespective of any wind, it is a very good bet that there is a caster at the center who can be targeted with disadvantage.

@Eddymage says that having your opponents deliberately target the center of the cloud is "reasoning is based on false assumption and on metagaming". Certainly it would be if it was done by every opponent in every instance2. But if your intelligent opponents have experience with similar magical effects, and they can clearly see how your cloud looks and moves, then targeting you while you are unseen in the center is not metagaming, it is just good worldbuilding as it acknowledges that NPCs have history, too.

Is it better to Dodge?

Dodging is better than Hiding, yes! Because you will likely not be able to utilize the benefits of Hiding other than the one you already have by being invisible except perhaps moving silently.

Is Dodging better than being invisible? Somewhat. Dodging means your attackers are at disadvantage, but you already had that with invisible. However, if you Dodge you will in addition have a bonus to some saving throws.

1 As written, the aura "looks like buzzing flies". How do buzzing flies look - and in particular, how do they look different from non-buzzing flies? My inclination would be to rule that the flies actually are making noise as well. But suppose your DM follows a strict reading of the ability - now you are surrounded by a cloud of flies that look like they should be buzzing but are not making sound - hence making the whole thing even more suspicious.

2 Real metagaming takes it up a level, though: spell effects that target a point in space are centered on the intersections of grid lines, while those that target creatures are centered on the centers of squares. If your opponents are tracking that distinction than they are metagaming.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "you can surround yourself with a magical aura that looks like buzzing flies": there is no indication about noise. Moreover, if the warlock used this ability while unseen by nobody, other creature see a cloud of things that looks like flies, and maybe they do not imagine that there is someone inside it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Eddymage
    Commented Feb 1 at 21:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Eddymage - Hence intelligent opponents will assume you are in the center. If you see a perfectly spherical effect that moves, whether it is a cloud of flies, insect swarm, spiritual guardians, or what have you, the safe bet is that your target is in the center. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kirt
    Commented Feb 1 at 23:00
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Experienced combatants can recognize some magical effects (or at least attempt to recognize them via Arcana checks). Magical effects that obscure sight or other senses are not rare on the battlefield and can be a good indication that an enemy is nearby. \$\endgroup\$
    – Shadomew
    Commented Feb 2 at 13:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Also, I would argue that the aura does make sound as it looks like buzzing flies, and buzzing is typically a sound descriptor. \$\endgroup\$
    – Shadomew
    Commented Feb 2 at 13:22
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ We're getting caught up in the one-off's here. The point is, magical effects point to someone/something being in the area. The proficient in magic the observer is, the more information they can glean and assume from simply seeing a magical effect. \$\endgroup\$
    – Shadomew
    Commented Feb 2 at 16:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .