The game presents 10 damage types: acid, cold, fire, force, lightning, necrotic, poison, psychic, radiant, thunder.

And my players asked a few things about using spells that deal typed damage in and out of combat:

  1. Does Psychic damage work on undead or on creatures with Int or Wis 1 or less?

  2. Radiant damage is basically a divine light, so in physics terms it's infrared rays. Can it be used to "toast" bacterias and purify (non magic) water?

  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ Not all light is infrared. Only infrared light is infrared. Most visible light also contains some small amount of infrared light, but not enough to kill bacteria. (For that you actually want ultraviolet light, not infrared. Most bacteria actually like infrared light as much as humans do, since it's a heat source. If it's enough to kill bacteria, it's enough to set things on fire.) \$\endgroup\$ Mar 29, 2013 at 21:08
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'd be inclined to split this into two separate questions... \$\endgroup\$
    – Wibbs
    Mar 29, 2013 at 22:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do bacteria even exist in D&D? \$\endgroup\$
    – okeefe
    Mar 30, 2013 at 0:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related: How to encourage a player's creativity without breaking the game? \$\endgroup\$
    – BESW
    Mar 30, 2013 at 0:35

2 Answers 2


No creature is immune to any kind of damage unless its stat block explicitly says it is.

You can think of psychic damage as interfering with a creature's "nervous system" or whatever magical thing it uses as an equivalent. Even mindless undead have some way of perceiving their environment and then manipulating the various parts of their body to get their body over to it and attack it; psychic damage is essentially high power feedback (like the really loud screech when you get a microphone next to its speaker) on these channels. If something would be better classified as a trap than as a creature, then it's probably immune to psychic damage.

Radiant damage isn't really light so much as it is divine power. It happens to look like light, but it's not; a laser or high-intensity infrared source would do fire damage. Radiant damage is like a flashlight that's been imbued with holy power to accomplish a specific task (namely, destroying some poor creature); the holy power only does what the ability says it does (damage), so powers that do radiant damage can't be used for other purposes unless blinking a bright flashlight briefly could accomplish those same purposes.

A brief discussion of the other damage types:

  • acid: read up on how acids work for more, but basically it reacts with the target's physical substance and changes it into something else
  • cold: removes (thermal) energy from the target
  • fire: adds (thermal) energy to the target
  • force: pushes on something without physically touching it (similar to, but not the same as, gravity & magnetism)
  • lightning: adds electrons (lots of them) to the target
  • necrotic: accelerates decay & the natural entropic breakdown of the target; some creatures might be immune to this if they can normally "live" for billions of years and they're made of something extremely stable, like gold (just because a golem's enchantment will last that long doesn't mean its physical form will)
  • poison: causes undesirable chemical reactions inside the target
  • thunder: compression wave in whatever medium the target is in; wouldn't work in a vacuum
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Great answer! The part about lightning is a bit misleading though, from what I understand, the voltage and the ionized plasma during discharge is what causes damage. Use your best judgement: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning \$\endgroup\$ Mar 30, 2013 at 0:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @ZacharyYates: True enough. Those are essentially side effects of having all those electrons pass through you, though. \$\endgroup\$
    – Oblivious Sage
    Mar 30, 2013 at 1:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ For reference, in Gamma World, Radiant damage translates to "Radiation" damage like alpha-beta-gamma-krypton-cosmic-etc sci-fi radiation types. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveED
    Mar 31, 2013 at 18:04
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Note that, in reality, a sufficiently bright flashlight could be used to sterilize water, at least as long as it puts out enough ultraviolet light. That's basically how UV sterilizers work. \$\endgroup\$ Apr 1, 2013 at 16:50

4e isn't expected to work like that...

As I set out in this answer, D&D 4e is a firmly mechanical system that isn't particularly interested in "what makes sense" or "how it would work in the real world." It's sacrificed that for balance, regularity, and other meta-issues that plagued earlier editions of the game. (I render no absolute judgement on whether this is a good thing; it depends entirely on what kind of game experience your group values).

So there aren't any rules about mundane water sterilization (because it's Dungeons & Dragons, not Dungeons & Utilities Services, and the rules reflect that priority), and damage types work normally against anything that isn't explicitly resistant or immune to them (which is good, balance-wise, because there are entire classes dedicated to dealing psychic damage and they'd be hosed against undead in the scenario your player proposes).

...but your group doesn't have to follow the system's expectations.

Just recognize there will be systemic complications which rise from that kind of precedent.

It's up to your group whether you bring real-world considerations (physics, logic, etc) into the game's rules... but if you do it's important to remember that the system isn't expecting such considerations. You'll probably find increasing contradictions and weird cul-de-sacs of logic if you go down this road, and you'll need to be prepared to deal with them.

This isn't solely a 4e issue

D&D 3.5 has similar problems, just disguised under a massive pile of increasingly complicated subsystems designed to try handling these issues. No RPG system can accurately reflect reality; we don't know enough about reality, nor do we have the time to model it. If 4e hasn't chosen to model the elements of reality that your party wants to explore, either tack on the house-rules you need or find system more compatible with the group's desired experience.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Now I want to run a game of "Dungeons and Utility Services." I'm imaging a bunch of plumbers who have to deal with all the monsters in the sewers. \$\endgroup\$
    – dluxcru
    Dec 2, 2018 at 7:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DavidDale Spigots & Servicefolk? Sewers & Servicefolk? \$\endgroup\$
    – T.J.L.
    Mar 19, 2019 at 18:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .