I've had a little of a dispute with a player regarding Truenamer, his Knowledge Focus class feature and whenever it applies as prereq to, let's say, gaining a prestige class.

The class feature is:

Knowledge Focus (Ex): As a truenamer, you spend a great deal of time studying the world around you in an effort to learn new truenames. At the levels indicated on Table 3—2, you gain a permanent +3 bonus on a Knowledge skill of your choice. Each time you gain this ability, you can apply it to a different Knowledge skill, or to the same Knowledge skill, if you want to focus on a particular area of expertise.

Basically, the player says that since the description tells that it's a permament bonus to skill (instead of a bonus to skillchecks), it shall be counted with skill ranks for any prereqs. Is there any RAW material that either confirms, or denies this?


1 Answer 1


Short Answer: No

It definitely does not count as ranks; it is a bonus. It’s effectively equivalent to the Skill Focus feat (which also provides an untyped permanent bonus). It does stack with Skill Focus, though, since they are different (and also does not count as Skill Focus for requirements, though I recommend houseruling that one).

Relevant rules:

Skill Ranks

A character’s number of ranks in a skill is based on how many skill points a character has invested in a skill. [...]

Each skill point you spend on a class skill gets you 1 rank in that skill. [...] Each skill point you spend on a cross-class skill gets your character ½ rank in that skill. [...]

In short, if you haven’t spent skill points, they aren’t ranks. There is exactly one exception to this (a poorly-considered feat from Cityscape) which explicitly states that it gives a single bonus rank.

Recommendation: ban anything that does let someone have more ranks than the normal limit

Skill ranks are very hard-and-fast things: you get a very specific number of them based on class and intelligence, they are placed once and locked in place, and most importantly, they have a very fixed maximum based on level. They are constantly used as a kind of “level-gate,” requiring you to be level X by requiring X+3 ranks in a skill. Skill points tend to be fairly cheap and skill requirements are usually pretty easy. In most cases, the only reason they exist is to force that level to be the minimum before taking the feat or prestige class.

There are some tricks for getting around this requirement (though Knowledge Focus is not one of them), but in most cases I would strongly recommend against allowing them. The level barriers on feats and prestige classes are important.

Except... maybe for a truenamer; they are that bad

Since your player is playing a truenamer, you might consider making an exception. Actually, you might consider totally revamping the truenamer, perhaps using one of the high-quality homebrew fixes out there. Kellus’s homebrew fix and Kyeudo’s homebrew fix are quite well-received.

Because with the Tome of Magic truenamer, we are talking about a class which is literally incapable of performing the things its description says it can do. Anyone who reads the truenaming chapter of Tome of Magic and makes a character with levels in truenamer, assuming that their character will work as Tome of Magic describes it, is in for a stunning level of disappointment and frustration. With a lot of optimization, you can get access to some really mediocre tricks; without optimizing, you could find yourself only barely able to do anything better than a commoner can.

Zaq, quite possibly the world’s foremost expert in the class, has written about his experiences playing the truenamer here, and then went on to write In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers.

I encourage anyone who is considering the class to read his experiences: he managed to make a truenamer that was reasonably fun, but it took an enormous amount of work, was only barely effective, and he was constantly running into problems of poorly-edited rules, unexplained features, crucial information that was outright missing from the book, and so on. After six months, he retired the character in frustration, despite massively enjoying the character himself. The mechanics were just that obnoxious to work with.

So seriously, please very strongly consider using one of the homebrew fixes. Failing that, letting your player into a prestige class early is among the least you can do.

A Footnote

1 All statements about truenamers being weak have a major caveat: at level 20, the truenamer suddenly and immediately becomes the most powerful class in the game, because it gains the ability to cast gate more-or-less at-will, twice a round, and can teleport to anyone who mentions his chosen nickname as a non-action. This does result in a hilarious interaction if you choose, say, “What” for your nickname:

BBEG and henchman are talking:

BBEG: What—

Truenamer appears out of nowhere, summons two solars, and disappears

BBEG: What the hell?!

Truenamer appears again, summons two more solars

Truenamer: “Say ‘what’ again, I dare you, I double dare you, mother—!”

Truenamer disappears again.

  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ I was on tenterhooks about that last bit. Excellent. \$\endgroup\$ May 1, 2014 at 16:24
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You seem to have answered the question in the first paragraph and devolved into a tangent. Please remove the tangent. \$\endgroup\$
    – wax eagle
    May 1, 2014 at 17:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Heh, I do agree that it has to be said 8) \$\endgroup\$ May 1, 2014 at 17:30
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ The tangent contains important information, and I think it deserves better than being hidden in an answer to barely-related question. I suggest extracting it to an independent Q&A pair, replacing it with a link here. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ernir
    May 1, 2014 at 20:36
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Ernir I'm planning on doing so when I get some more time. For now, it's here. \$\endgroup\$
    – KRyan
    May 1, 2014 at 20:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .